36
S.L. Pfister et al. / Prostaglandins & other Lipid Mediators 123 (2016) 33–39
Table 1
2.6.5. N,O-Dimethyl-(6Z,10R)-10-(tert-
butyldimethylsiloxy)pentadec-6-en-8-ynohydroxamate
Percent decomposition at 75◦ C.
(6)
0.25 h
3.0 h
330 h
tert-Butyldimethylchlorosilane (1.6 g, 11 mmol) was added to a
stirred solution of enynol 5 (1.55 g, 5.25 mmol) and imidazole (1.4 g,
20 mmol) in 10 mL of dry DMF under N2. After 1.5 h, the flask and
contents were transferred to a cold room (5 ◦C) overnight. The mix-
ture was then quenched with water, allowed to warm to 23 ◦C, and
stirred for 2 h. Diethyl ether was added and the mixture was washed
with water (2×), brine, dried (Na2SO4), filtered and concentrated
to give 2.19 g of an oil. This material was purified by chromatog-
raphy on 130 g of silica, eluting with 20% → 25% EtOAc/hexane, to
give 1.96 g (91%) of 6 as an oil. 1H NMR (C6D6) ı 0.18 (s, 3H), 0.28
(s, 3H), 0.86 (t, J = 7, 3H), 1.03 (s, 9H), 1.27 (m, 4H), 1.42 (pent, J = 7,
2H), 1.55 (m, 2H), 1.81 (sept, J = 7, 4H), 2.32 (t, J = 7, 2H), 2.42 (q,
J = 7, 2H), 2.88 (s, 3H), 3.05 (s, 3H), 4.60 (t, J = 6.5, 1H), 5.50 (d, J = 11,
1H), 5.67 (m, 1H). LC/MS (+APCI) 427 (M + NH4)+, 410 (M + H)+, 278
(M + H-TBSOH)+.
HETE analog 1
15(S)-HETE
0.0 0.0
1.6 0.4
ND
94
ND
1
78
2
Data presented as mean SEM. ND, not determined.
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
FEMALE
MALE
FEMALE
MALE
***
**
*
*
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
HETE ANALOG 1 (Log M)
15(S)-HETE (LOG M)
Fig. 2. Contractile responses to 15(S)-HETE and HETE analog 1 in female and male
rabbit pulmonary arteries. Results are expressed as percent KCl (40 mM) con-
tractions, and data points are the mean SEM for n = 8–12. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01;
***p < 0.001; female vs male.
2.6.6.
(6Z,10R)-10-(tert-Butyldimethylsiloxy)pentadec-6-en-8-ynal (7)
Diisobutylaluminum hydride (5.4 mL of a 1.0 M solution in
toluene) was added dropwise to a stirred, cooled (−78 ◦C bath)
solution of compound 6 (1.76 g, 4.30 mmol) in 38 mL of dry toluene
under N2. After 15 min, the reaction was quenched by dropwise
addition of MeOH (2 mL) and then allowed to warm to 23 ◦C. Diethyl
ether and sat. aq. Rochelle’s salt were added and the mixture was
stirred vigorously for 15 min, then separated. The organic solution
was washed with water (2×), brine, dried (MgSO4), filtered and
concentrated to give 1.50 g of an oil. This material was purified by
chromatography on 100 g of silica, eluting with 12% EtOAc/hexane,
to give 1.32 g (88%) of 7 as an oil which was used without delay in
the next step.
2.7. Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as the mean SEM. Statistical analysis of
the vascular reactivity data was performed by a two-way ANOVA
followed by Bonferroni’s posttest. The cell proliferation and cell
migration studies were analyzed using Student’s t-test. Values were
considered significant at P < 0.05.
2.8. Materials
15(S)-HETE was obtained from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor,
MI). [3H]-Thymidine was obtained from Du Pont NEN (Boston,
MA). Cell culture reagents were obtained from Invitrogen (Carlsbad,
CA). Flasks used in cell culture were obtained from Corning (Corn-
ing, NY). Chemicals used in the synthesis of HETE analog 1 were
obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI). All other chemicals
were of reagent grade.
2.6.7. (5Z,11Z,15R)-15-Hydroxyeicosa-5,11-dien-13-ynoic acid
(1)
Potassium tert-butoxide (12 mL of a 1.0 M solution in THF) was
added to a stirred suspension of 4- carboxybutyltriphenylphospho-
nium bromide (2.5 g, 5.6 mmol, dried in vacuo at 65 ◦C) in 20 mL of
dry THF under N2. After 15 min the orange-red mixture was cooled
in a −78 ◦C bath. A solution of aldehyde 7 (1.32 g, 3.77 mmol) in
20 mL of dry toluene was added over 15 min, keeping the internal
temperature between −68 and −71 ◦C. The mixture was allowed to
warm to 23 ◦C, then quenched with sat. aq. KH2PO4 and stirred
for 16 h. The biphasic mixture (pH of aqueous phase = 4.5) was
extracted twice with diethyl ether. The combined organic extract
was dried (Na2SO4), eluted through a silica gel pad with diethyl
ether and concentrated to give 1.54 g of an oil. To a stirred solution
of this material in 20 mL of THF under N2 was added tetrabuty-
lammonium fluoride (1.0 M in THF, 20 mL) in two equal portions
16 h apart. After a further 4 h, the mixture was diluted with half-
saturated brine and extracted with three portions of EtOAc. The
combined organic extract was dried (Na2SO4), filtered and con-
centrated to give 1.7 g of an oil. This material was purified by
chromatography on 125 g of silica, eluting with 50% EtOAc/hexane,
to give 1.08 g (89%) of 1 as an oil. The ratio of 5Z to 5E isomers was
determined to be 94.4: 5.6 by 1H NMR. 1H NMR (C6D6) ı 0.87 (t,
J = 7, 3H), 0.93 (s, 1H, OH), 1.22 (m, 4H), 1.35 (m, 4H), 1.46 (br t,
J = 7, 2H), 1.57 (br t, J = 7, 2H), 1.71 (m, 2H), 2.00 (br q, J = 7, 4H), 2.16
(t, J = 7, 2H), 2.38 (br q, J = 6.5, 2H), 4.45 (br t, J = 6.5, 1H), 5.27 (m,
1H), 5.41 (m, 1H), 5.52 (d, J = 11, 1H), 5.70 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (C6D6)
ı 14.2, 22.9, 24.8, 25.3, 26.6, 27.2, 28.6, 29.5, 30.3, 31.8, 33.1, 38.3,
63.2, 81.8, 95.5, 109.4, 129.0, 131.2, 144.0, 178.8. LC/MS (+ESI) 303
(M+H–H2O)+; (−ESI) 319 (M−H)−.
3. Results
Stability assays at 75◦ C indicated that 15(S)-HETE decomposed
to the extent of 78 2% in 15 min, while HETE analog 1 (racemic
form) showed only 1.6 0.4% decomposition after 3 h (Table 1).
Thus HETE analog 1 proved suitable for extended storage and peri-
odic sampling in various forms (neat, solution, formulation) with
no special precautions other than routine refrigeration at 5 ◦C under
nitrogen.
The ability of 15(S)-HETE and HETE analog 1 to contract pul-
monary arteries from female and male rabbits is shown in Fig. 2.
Both 15(S)-HETE and HETE analog 1 produced a concentration-
dependent vasoconstriction that was significantly greater in
females compared to males. The EC50 values were not differ-
ent between 15(S)-HETE and HETE analog 1 (see Table 2). While
both compounds had a greater effect in females, the maximal
response was greater with 15(S)-HETE compared to HETE analog 1
(maximal contraction in females; 49.7 4.1% vs 27.3 4.4%; 15(S)-
two compounds was not different (maximal contraction in males;
19.3 2.8% vs 24.1 2.3%; 15(S)-HETE vs HETE analog 1).
The effect of 15(S)-HETE and HETE analog 1 on vascular
smooth muscle cell proliferation is shown in Fig. 3. Both com-