1004
J . Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 1004-1006
Sch em e 1
Rea ction of Alip h a tic Am in es w ith
Acetoa ceta n ilid e in th e P r esen ce of Zeolite
Ca ta lyst. Solven t-F r ee Syn th esis of
Sym m etr ic N,N′-Dia lk ylu r ea s
Franca Bigi, Bettina Frullanti, Raimondo Maggi,
Giovanni Sartori,* and Elena Zambonin
Dipartimento di Chimica Organica e Industriale
dell'Universita`, Viale delle Scienze, I-43100 Parma, Italy
Received J une 10, 1998
In tr od u ction
Use of clean heterogeneous catalysts such as clays and
zeolites in organic synthesis has received considerable
attention in the past few years, mainly due to the
minimum production of byproducts and pollutant materi-
als.1
In fact, the possibility of performing efficient chemical
transformations with reusable catalysts avoiding toxic
reagents, large amount of solvents, and expensive puri-
fication methods represents a fundamental target of the
modern organic synthesis.2
As a part of our program aimed at developing new,
selective, and preparatively useful methodologies based
on the use of heterogeneous catalysts as promoters for
fine chemicals preparation,3 we have recently reported
the synthesis of symmetric N,N′-diphenylureas from
aromatic amines and ethyl acetoacetate promoted by
zeolite HSZ-360.4
By considering the mechanism of this reaction, we
found it reasonable that the aromatic amine 1 first reacts
with ethyl acetoacetate 2, giving acetoacetanilide 3
which, in the presence of zeolite catalyst, is converted
into N,N′-diphenylurea 4 and acetone through nuclephilic
attack by a second molecule of aromatic amine (Scheme
1).
On these grounds we attempted the preparation of
unsymmetrical N,N′-disubstituted ureas by reaction of
acetoacetanilide with different aromatic amines under
conditions similar to those employed for the synthesis of
symmetrical ones. However, the process seemed to have
a major drawback: the formation of all three possible
diphenylureas in almost equimolecular amount. On the
other hand, use of aliphatic amines resulted in the
production of mixtures of N-phenyl-N′-alkyl- and N,N′-
dialkylureas as the latter compounds the main reaction
products.
F igu r e 1. 1. Reactivity of acetoacetanilide 3 with benzylamine
5a over dealuninated Y-zeolite HSZ-360 as a function of time.
Here we report results of our studies on the above-
described reaction that allowed us to find a simple and
safe methodology for the synthesis of symmetrical N,N′-
dialkylureas.
Substituted ureas are an industrially important class
of compounds displaying a wide range of applications,
e.g., use as herbicides, antioxidants in gasoline, corrosion
inhibitors, and drugs.5 As most of the applied methods
for the preparation of these compounds are essentially
based on phosgene and isocyanates,6 there is a continuing
interest in their catalytic synthesis via phosgene-free
reactions.
Resu lts a n d Discu ssion
To find out which pathway was operating in the
process, the model reaction between acetoacetanilide 3
(0.01 mol) and benzylamine 5a (0.04 mol) in 1,2-dichlo-
robenzene (5 mL) at 180 °C and in the presence of 0.5 g
of zeolite HSZ-360 (surface acidity7 0.51 mequiv of H+/g,
SiO2/Al2O3 molar ratio 13.9) was analyzed as function of
time.8 It is evident from Figure 1 that acetoacetanilide 3
(Scheme 2, Y ) NHPh) was converted into N,N′-diben-
zylurea 8a via the unsymmetrical N-phenyl-N-benzy-
lurea 7a as the latter was detected in appreciable
amounts at an intermediate stage. The concentration of
7a raised the maximum value (20%) after 1 h, and then,
(1) (a) Ho¨lderich, W. F. Organic Reactions in Zeolites. In Compre-
hensive Supramolecular Chemistry; Atwood, J . L., Ed.; Pergamon: New
York, 1996; Vol. 7, p 671. (b) Balogh, M.; Laszlo, P. Organic Chemistry
Using Clays; Springer-Verlag: New York, 1993. (c) Mizuno, N.; Misono,
M. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 199.
(2) (a) Sheldon, R. A. Chem. Ind. (London) 1992, 903. (b) Sheldon,
R. A. J . Mol. Catal., A 1996, 107, 75. (c) Dittmer, D. C. Chem. Ind.
(London) 1997, 779.
(3) (a) Sartori, G.; Bigi, F.; Pastorio, A.; Porta, C.; Arienti, A.; Maggi,
R.; Moretti, N.; Gnappi, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 9177. (b) Sartori,
G.; Pastorio, A.; Maggi, R.; Bigi, F. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 8287. (c)
Ballini, R.; Bigi, F.; Carloni, S.; Maggi, R.; Sartori, G. Tetrahedron Lett.
1997, 38, 4169. (d) Ballini, R.; Bosica, G.; Maggi, R.; Sartori, G. Synlett
1997, 795. (e) Bigi, F.; Carloni, S.; Maggi, R.; Muchetti, C.; Sartori, G.
J . Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 7024.
(5) Vishnyakova, T. P.; Golubeva, I. A.; Glebova, E. V. Russ. Chem.
Rev. (Engl. Transl.) 1985, 54, 249.
(6) (a) March, J . Advanced Organic Chemistry; J ohn Wiley & Sons:
New York, 1985; p 370. (b) Kno¨lker, H.-J .; Braxmeier, T.; Schlechtin-
gen, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 2497.
(7) Determined in our laboratory by temperature-programmed de-
sorption of ammonia gas (NH3-TPD): Berteau, P.; Delmon, B. Catal.
Today 1989, 5, 121.
(4) Bigi, F.; Maggi, R.; Sartori, G.; Zambonin, E. J . Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1998, 513.
(8) Product analyses were carried out by HPLC.
10.1021/jo981109g CCC: $18.00 © 1999 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 01/09/1999