Facile Color Tuning of Light-Emitting Polymers
A R T I C L E S
Figure 5. EL spectra of the copolymers 6-9 in devices ITO/PEDOT-
PSS/polymer/Ca-Al.
Figure 7. Time-resolved normalized EL spectra of a blend of dye 4 (3 wt
%) in polymer 11.
devices show stable emission with no significant change in the
emission spectra over lifetimes of >103 s. By contrast, similar
devices using a blend of perylene dyes and polyfluorenes
showed rapid degradation with the emission intensity dropping
to 50% of the original luminance after only 60 s, accompanied
by a decrease of an order of magnitude in luminescence
efficiency, a change in emission spectra from the perylene
toward the fluorene, and a rapid increase in voltage demand,
which is explicable in terms of the dye aggregating and forming
nonradiative trap sites. As shown in Figure 7, within 15 min
the emission from a blend of dye 4 in poly(dioctylfluorene)
becomes dominated by the polyfluorene, closely resembling the
solution spectrum of the copolymer 8.
Given that because of the low concentration of dyes these
copolymers should be highly compatible with each other and
the homopolymer for blending purposes, it should be possible
by blending suitable combinations of these materials to obtain
efficient emission with colors covering much of the visible
spectrum and even potentially white emission. White emission
has been previously achieved by us by blending 12 with a blue-
emitting polymer.18
The second type of polymer is made by the same synthetic
procedure as that described previously but using a mono-
brominated perylene derivative (Scheme 3). As addition of this
to the growing polymer chain acts as a terminating (endcapping)
step, the polymers so obtained contain perylene units only at
the end of the polymer. As the dyes are only found at the end
of the chains, these polymers are more suitable for studying
the physics of energy transfer between the fluorene and the dye
units than the polymers described in the previous section, in
which the dyes are randomly distributed throughout the material.
This method also permits control of the Mn and hence the
physical properties, including film-forming abilities, of the
resulting polymers by varying the ratio of monomer to endcap-
per, as has been demonstrated by Scherf et al. for polyfluorenes
with triarylamine endcappers.19 As the chain can also be
Figure 6. Electroluminescence from devices using polymers 9 (left), 7
(center), and 11 (right).
the homopolymer 11 is shown in Figure 6. The emission from
8 was deep red (CIE x,y ) 0.636,0.338) with a maximum at
675 nm, which is over 30 nm red shifted from the PL maximum
(643 nm). Somewhat surprisingly given its relatively low PL
efficiency, the copolymer 8 showed relatively high EL efficiency
and luminance and the lowest onset potential of the copolymers.
Presumably because the difference in electron affinities between
the dye and the fluorene is greatest for the red emitting perylene
(∼0.4 eV), the charge trapping is particularly efficient in this
case.
The enhancement in color tuning is shown clearly by the
comparison of the emissions from 9 under optical (Figure 4)
and electrical stimulation (Figure 6). The external EL efficien-
cies of 0.2-0.6% for nonoptimized devices show that these
copolymers have considerable potential as emissive materials
for full-color displays. The maximum EL efficiencies for the
LEDs using 6 (0.9 Cd/A) and 8 (1.6 Cd/A) are higher than those
seen for green-emitting PPV derivatives under similar condi-
tions15,16 and are not greatly inferior to the efficiencies (2-7
Cd/A) of optimized blue- or green-emitting polyfluorene devices
using similar electrode materials.17 The efficiencies for the red-
orange-emitting polymers 8 and 9 are an order of magnitude
higher than those for the red-orange-emitting copolymer 12
made by the Hagihara polycoupling of 3 with a diethynylben-
zene8 which has a maximum efficiency of only 0.02%.18a The
(15) Kim, J. S.; Granstrom, M.; Johansson, N.; Salaneck, W. R.; Friend, R. H.;
Daik, R.; Feast, W. J.; Cacialli, F. J. Appl. Phys. 1998, 84, 6859-6870.
(16) Brown, T. M.; Kim, J. S.; Friend, R. H.; Cacialli, F.; Daik, R.; Feast, W.
J. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1999, 75, 1679-1681.
(17) (a) Grice, A. W.; Bradley, D. D. C.; Bernius, M. T.; Inbasekaran, M.; Wu,
W. W.; Woo, E. P. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1998, 73, 629. (b) Kim, J. S.; Friend,
R. H.; Cacialli, F. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1999, 74, 3084-3086. (c) Ho, P. K.
H.; Thomas, D. S.; Friend, R. H.; Tessler, N. Science 1999, 285, 233-
236. (d) Gross, M.; Mu¨ller, D. C.; Nothofer, H.-G.; Scherf, U.; Neher, D.;
Meerholz, K. Nature 2000, 405, 661.
(18) (a) Tasch, S.; List, E. W. J.; Hochfilzer, C.; Leising, G.; Schlichting, P.;
Rohr, U.; Geerts, Y.; Scherf, U.; Mu¨llen, K. Phys. ReV. B: Condens. Matter
1997, 56, 4479. (b) List, E. W. J.; Tasch, S.; Hochfilzer, C.; Leising, G.;
Schlichting, P.; Rohr, U.; Geerts, Y.; Scherf, U.; Mu¨llen, K. Opt. Mater.
1998, 9, 183.
(19) Miteva, T.; Meisel, A.; Knoll, W.; Nothofer, H. G.; Scherf, U.; Mu¨ller, D.
C.; Merrholz, K.; Yasuda, A.; Neher, D. AdV. Mater. 2001, 13, 565-570.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 2, 2003 441