Organometallics 2007, 26, 2133-2136
2133
From Neutral Zn4O4 Clusters to a Cationic ZnO Dimer in Solution
Matthias Driess,*,† Klaus Merz,† and Robert Schoenen‡
Institute of Chemistry: Metalorganics and Inorganic Materials, Technische UniVersita¨t Berlin,
Strasse des 17. Juni 135, D-10623 Berlin, Germany, and Department of Chemistry, Ruhr-UniVersia¨t
Bochum, UniVersita¨tsstrasse 150, D-44801 Bochum, Germany
ReceiVed December 6, 2006
Summary: The suitability of the tetrameric ZnO aggregates
[(iPrO)ZnMe]4 (1a) and [(Me3SiO)ZnMe]4 (1b) as potential
sources for molecular models of low-coordinated zinc centers
and actiVe sites on zinc oxide catalysts is reported. The
formation and fate of the resulting cationic Zn4O4 degradation
products by reaction of 1a and 1b with B(C6F5)3 in the presence
of different organic donor substrates haVe been studied by
means of ESI mass spectrometry. While 1a affords the cationic
monozinc complexes [MeZn(L)]+ (2a: L ) THF, 2b: 15-c-5,
2c: DMAP), the cluster 1b furnishes in the presence of DMAP
[MeZn(OSiMe3)2Zn(DMAP)2]+ (3), the first dimeric ZnO ag-
gregate cation in solution, and the [MeB(C6F5)3] anion.
Additionally, the neutral dinuclear ZnO aggregate [(Me3SiO)-
Zn(C6F5)thf]2 (4) results from Me/C6F5 exchange reactions as
the final product, which has been characterized by NMR
spectroscopy and a single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis.
allow changing specifically the environment of active zinc
centers at the molecular level. We have reported the synthesis
of a wide range of different molecular ZnnOm clusters9 that are
suitable single-source precursors for the synthesis of nanoscaled
zinc and zinc oxide particles,10 but they could also be promising
sources for molecular models of terminal, low-coordinated zinc
centers on ZnO surfaces. However, molecular compounds with
such highly electrophilic zinc atoms are expected to be extremely
reactive and therefore difficult to isolate. In fact, only a few
reports are known on the structural chemistry of mononuclear
cationic zinc complexes,11 but no polynuclear cationic ZnO
cluster could hitherto be isolated. One alternative approach to
generate polynuclear ZnO cluster cations is offered by mass
spectrometric (MS) methods. We have currently shown that one
can easily produce polynuclear ZnO cluster cations in the gas
phase under EI-MS conditions.10f The used ZnO cluster sources
are simply accessible by Bronsted acid-base reaction of
dialkylzinc compounds with silanoles or alcohols.9,10a,g The
nuclearity and the degree of aggregation of ZnO units is easily
tunable by changing the steric demand of the substituent at the
oxygen center. While methyl, trimethylsilyl, or isopropyl groups
lead to Zn4O4 clusters, the use of larger substituents such as
triphenylsilyl or tert-butyl favors the formation of spirocyclic
Zn3O4 or Zn6O10 clusters.9 How could one achieve the synthesis
and stabilization of cationic polynuclear ZnO clusters in the
condensed phase using the latter molecular ZnnOm clusters? This
could be achieved by replacing the alkyl group at the zinc atom
by a large and weakly coordinating anion such as B(C6F5)4- or
Introduction
Zinc oxide is an important heterogeneous catalyst for the
conversion of water gas (CO, CO2, H2) to methanol. Interest-
ingly, the catalytic activity of ZnO can be significantly increased
by the presence of promotors such as copper or alkali metals,
which apparently change the electronic properties of the active
sites at the ZnO surface.1-3 However, the efficiency of the
catalytic systems depends not only on their composition but
also on the size of the particles due to several structural defects.4
Therefore, the explanations for different activities of nondoped
and doped “real” ZnO catalysts have been a matter of
controversial discussions in the literature, and the complex
reaction mechanism could not be understood until recently.5,6
From results of different working groups, it is known that the
reaction on the ZnO surface takes place at low-coordinate, highly
electrophilic zinc centers.7,8 Another possibility to evaluate the
role of such zinc centers as active sites on ZnO surfaces is
offered by using the model catalyst approach. The latter may
-
Al(ORf)4 [Rf ) CH(CF3)2, C(CH3)(CF3)2, C(CF3)3].12 This
strategy has also been successfully used for the synthesis of
highly electrophilic, cationic zirconium complexes, which are
valuable homogeneous catalysts.13 The abstraction of a alkyl
group at the metal center can be achieved by reaction with strong
(9) (a) Driess, M.; Merz, K.; Rell, S. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 2517-
2522. (b) Driess, M.; Hu, L.; Merz, K. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 51-53.
(c) Schindler, F.; Schmidbaur, H. Angew. Chem. 1967, 16, 697-708.
(10) (a) Merz, K.; Schoenen, R.; Driess, M. J. Phys. IV Fr. 2001, 11,
467. (b) Driess, M.; Merz, K.; Schoenen, R.; Rabe, R.; Kruis, F. E.; Roy,
A.; Birkner, A. C. R.-Chim. 2003, 6 (3), 273. (c) Hambrock, J.; Rabe, S.;
Merz, K.; Wohlfarth, A.; Birkner, A.; Fischer, R. A.; Driess, M. J. Mater.
Chem. 2003, 13 (7), 1731. (d) Kurtz, M.; Bauer, N.; Buescher, C.; Wilmer,
H.; Hinrichsen, O.; Becker, R.; Rabe, S.; Merz, K.; Driess, M.; Fischer, R.
A.; Muhler, M. Catal. Lett. 2004, 92 (1-2), 49. (e) Polarz, S.; Roy, A.;
Merz, M.; Halm, S.; Schro¨der, D.; Schneider, L.; Bacher, G.; Kruis, F. E.;
Driess, M. Small 2005, 1, 2. (f) Schro¨der, D.; Schwarz, H.; Polarz, S.; Driess,
M. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7, 1049. (g) Merz, K.; Block, S.;
Schoenen, R.; Driess, M. Dalton Trans. 2003, 17, 3365.
† Technische Universita¨t Berlin.
‡ Ruhr-Universita¨t Bochum.
(1) Spencer, M. S. Catal. Lett. 1998, 50, 37-40.
(2) Chanchlani, K. G.; Hudgins, R. R.; Silveston, P. L. J. Catal. 1992,
136, 59-72.
(3) Rozovskii, A. Y.; Lin, G. I. Top. Catal. 2003, 22, 137-150.
(4) (a) Ischenko, V.; Polarz, S.; Grote, D.; Stavarache, V.; Fink, K.;
Driess, M. AdV. Funct. Mat. 2005, 15, 1945-1954. (b) Polarz, S.; Ischenko,
V.; Hinrichsen, O.; Driess, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2965-
2969.
(5) Millar, G. J.; Rochester, C. H.; Bailey, S.; Waugh, K. C. J. Chem.
Soc., Faraday Trans. 1993, 89 (7), 1109-1115.
(11) (a) Walker, D. A.; Woodman, T. J.; Hughes, D. L.; Bochmann, M.
Organometallics 2001, 20, 3772-3776. (b) Walker, D. A.; Woodman, T.
J.; Schormann, M.; Hughes, D. L.; Bochmann, M. Organometallics 2003,
22, 797-803. (c) Hannant, M. D.; Schormann, M.; Bochmann, M. Dalton
Trans. 2002, 4071-4073. (d) Sarazin, Y.; Schormann, M.; Bochmann, M.
Organometallics, 2004, 13, 3296-3302.
(6) (a) Fujita, S.; Usui, M.; Ito, H.; Takezawa, N. J. Catal. 1995, 157,
403-413. (b) Nakamura, J.; Choi, Y.; Fujitani, T. Top. Catal. 2003, 22,
277-285.
(7) French, S. A.; Sokol, A. A.; Bromley, S. T.; Catlow, C. R. A.;
Sherwood, P. Top. Catal. 2003, 24, 161-172
(8) Kurtz, M.; Strunk, J.; Hinrichsen, O.; Muhler, M.; Fink, K.; Meyer,
B.; Wo¨ll, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2790-2794.
(12) Krossing, I. Chem.-Eur. J. 2001, 7, 490-502.
(13) Brackemeyer, T.; Erker, G.; Fro¨hlich, R. Organometallics 1997, 16,
531-536.
10.1021/om061108b CCC: $37.00 © 2007 American Chemical Society
Publication on Web 03/16/2007