1562 J ournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2001, Vol. 44, No. 10
Gezginci et al.
dropwise to a solution of 5 mmol of the respective oxadiazolone
and 5 mmol of AcOK in 10 mL of DMF. NaI (5 mmol) was
added, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for
72 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with 20 mL of H2O
and extracted with 3 × 40 mL of EtOAc. The organic layers
were combined and washed with 120 mL of 1% Na2SO3
solution, 120 mL of H2O, and 120 mL of brine. The solution
was dried over Na2SO4, and the solvent was evaporated. A
yellow oil was obtained, which was chromatographed on silica
gel using hexanes/EtOAc (7:3 for 5 and 6, and 8:2 for 7) as
eluent. Colorless to yellow oils were obtained, which slowly
crystallized. Recrystallization from a mixture of hexanes and
whereas 10, which was 4 times less potent than pyrazi-
namide, achieved equal potency with the drug when it
was protected. To our surprise, the 1,3,4-oxathiazoline-
2-ones 14-16 were the most active compounds in the
series, having activities ranging from 8 to 16 times as
potent as pyrazinamide. Interestingly enough, a mem-
ber of this series (15) was recently reported as a
microbicide in a patent application.18
In summary, the results show that bioreversible
modification of pyridine- and pyrazinecarboxylic acid
bioisosteres to more lipophilic precursors can increase
their activity. Although the compounds were not tested
against pyrazinamide-resistant strains of M. tubercu-
losis, they can be expected to be effective against most
of these strains because of the knowledge that most
pyrazinamide resistance results from lack of pyrazina-
midase (nicotinamidase) enzyme in the bacteria.20 Since
the compounds do not contain an amide bond that has
to be hydrolyzed for activity, pyrazinamidase would not
be necessary for the activation of the synthesized
compounds. In the case of the 1,3,4-oxathiazoline-2-ones
14-16, the species responsible for the antimycobacterial
activity is unknown, so it is uncertain if these com-
pounds would be active against pyrazinamide-resistant
strains.
1
EtOAc gave 5-7. 5: yield 33%. H NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.88 (d,
1
2H), 7.59 (d, 2H), 5.65 (s, 2H), 1.18 (s, 9H). 6: yield 37%. H
NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.90 (m, 2H), 7.99 (m, 1H), 7.55 (m, 1H), 5.63
1
(s, 2H), 1.19 (s, 9H). 7: yield 51%. H NMR (CDCl3): δ 9.29
(d, 1H), 8.81 (d, 1H), 8.66 (d, 1H), 6.09 (s, 2H), 1.08 (s, 9H).
Gen er a l P r oced u r es for th e P r ep a r a tion of th e Oxa -
d ia zoleth ion es 8-10. Meth od 1 for 8 a n d 9. Acetic anhy-
dride (7.3 mmol) was added dropwise to a mixture of 7.3 mmol
of the respective amidoxime and 7.3 mmol of Et3N in 30 mL
of CH2Cl2. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4
h. The solids were filtered, washed with CH2Cl2 and H2O, and
air-dried. The filtrate was washed with 30 mL of H2O and
evaporated. The solids were combined with the ones obtained
from the mother liquor and dissolved in 40 mL of DMF. The
solution was cooled to 0 °C in an ice-water bath, and 25.5
mmol of CS2 and 19.2 mmol of a 50% dispersion of NaH in
mineral oil were added. The mixture was stirred for 1 h. A 1
N HCl solution (80 mL) was added very carefully, and the
mixture was stirred for another hour and refrigerated over-
night. The crystals were collected by filtration, washed with
H2O, and recrystallized twice from EtOH to give 8 or 9.
Exp er im en ta l Section
Gen er a l. Melting points were determined with an electro-
thermal capillary melting point apparatus and are uncor-
rected. 1H and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra
were obtained using a Varian Gemini 200 spectrometer at 200
and 50 MHz, respectively. Chemical shifts are reported in ppm
downfield (δ) from internal TMS. Elemental analyses were
performed by Desert Analytics of Tucson, Arizona, and were
within 0.4% of the calculated values except where stated
otherwise (Table 1). Column chromatography was performed
using silica gel purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co. (60 A,
70-230 mesh).
Meth od 2 for 8-10. To a stirred suspension of 7.3 mmol
of the respective amidoxime in 60 mL of MeCN was added 10.9
mmol ofTCDI (90%) in one portion. A clear solution formed
for a moment, and then a yellow precipitation followed. To this
mixture, 29.2 mmol of DBU was added dropwise. A clear
solution was obtained again, which was stirred at room
temperature overnight. The mixture was poured into 120 mL
of H2O and neutralized using 6 N HCl. The precipitate was
filtered and washed with H2O. The mother liquor was refriger-
ated overnight, and the solids were filtered, combined with
the first crop, and recrystallized from ethanol to give 8-10.
8: yield method 1: 35%, method 2: 80%. 1H NMR (DMSO-
d6): δ 8.91 (dd, 2H), 8.06 (dd, 2H), 6.19 (br s, 1H). 9: yield
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for th e P r ep a r a tion of Oxa d ia zo-
lon es 2-4. The respective amidoxime14,15,17 (10 mmol) and a
magnetic stirring bar were placed in a 100 mL round-bottomed
flask, and the flask was sealed with a rubber septum. N2 was
introduced, and 15 mL of anhydrous DMF was added via
syringe. After the addition of 12 mmol pyridine, the mixture
was stirred at room temperature until dissolution and then
cooled to 0 °C in an ice-water bath. Methyl chloroformate (11
mmol) was added, and the mixture was stirred for 3 h while
warming to room temperature. The mixture was diluted with
30 mL of H2O, and the resulting solution was extracted with
3 × 30 mL of EtOAc. The organic phases were combined and
dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. Upon filtration and evaporation
of the solvent, a yellow oil (in the case of 2 and 3) was obtained.
The pyrazine derivative 4 gave, upon dilution of the reaction
mixture with H2O, a solid, which was washed with H2O and
air-dried. The oils were dissolved in 60 mL of toluene and
refluxed for 24 h. The solid pyrazine derivative was suspended
in 60 mL of xylenes and refluxed (140 °C) for 24 h. Then the
mixtures were allowed to cool to room temperature, and the
volatiles were removed under vacuum (2 and 3) or let stand
overnight (4). The solids were recrystallized twice from EtOH
(2 and 4) or MeCN (3) to give 2-4. 2: yield 48%. 1H NMR
(DMSO-d6): δ 8.83 (d, 2H), 7.77 (d, 2H), 3.50 (br s, 1H). 3:
1
method 1: 28%, method 2: 79%. H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 9.08
(d, 1H), 8.84 (dd, 1H), 8.34 (ddd, 1H), 7.70 (dd, 1H). 10: yield
1
89%. H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 9.25 (d, 1H), 8.90 (m, 2H).
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for th e Alk yla tion of Oxa d ia zole-
th ion es 8-10 (11-13). Chloromethyl pivalate (7.1 mmol) was
added dropwise to a stirred solution of 5.9 mmol of the
respective oxadiazolethione and 7.1 mmol of Et3N in 10 mL of
DMF. The solution was stirred at room temperature for 7 h,
and another equivalent of chloromethyl pivalate and Et3N was
added. The solution was stirred at room temperature for a total
of 24 h. For the last 1.5 h, it was heated at 50 °C. The mixture
was cooled to room temperature and poured into crushed ice
with vigorous stirring. In the case of 11 and 13, the solids were
collected by filtration, washed with water, and recrystallized
twice from petroleum ether to give 11 and 13. Compound 12
separated as an oil, which was extracted with 3 × 50 mL of
EtOAc. The solution was dried over Na2SO4 and filtered, and
the solvent was evaporated. The residue was dissolved heating
slightly in hexanes and filtered. Hexanes were removed under
vacuum. A tan oil was obtained, which was chromatographed
on silica gel using hexanes/EtOAc (9:1) as eluent. The product
solidified in the freezer and was recrystallized from petroleum
ether in the freezer to give 12. 11: yield 83%. 1H NMR
(CDCl3): δ 8.80 (dd, 2H), 7.94 (dd, 2H), 5.83 (s, 2H), 1.22 (s,
9H). 12: yield 78%. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 9.31 (dd, 1H), 8.77
(dd, 1H), 8.34 (m, 1H), 7.44 (m, 1H), 5.83 (s, 2H), 1.22 (s, 9H).
13: yield 84%. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 9.37 (d, 1H), 8.77 (m, 2H),
5.86 (s, 2H), 1.22 (s, 9H).
1
yield 52%. H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 8.94 (br s, 1H), 8.75 (br s,
1H), 8.15 (d, 1H), 7.58 (q, 1H), 3.81 (br s, 1H). 13C NMR
(DMSO-d6): δ 159.92, 155.86, 152.85, 146.91, 134.06, 124.46,
120.01. 4: yield: 57%. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 9.13 (d, 1H),
8.81 (m, 2H), 3.61 (br s, 1H). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 159.69,
156.41, 147.57, 144.91, 142.60, 139.11.
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for th e Alk yla tion of Oxa d ia zolo-
n es 2-4 (5-7). Chloromethyl pivalate (6 mmol) was added