Total Synthesis of (()-Daurichromenic Acid and Analogues
improve the yield of the dehydrogenation step and
additional structural analogues are being prepared by
this method. In addition, the synthetic route is being
adapted for use in polymer-supported synthesis and
alternative modular and concise syntheses of dau-
richromenic acid analogues are under active investiga-
tion.
F IGURE 5. Regioisomeric Knoevenagel condensation-elec-
trocyclization reaction products 39 and dehydrogenation prod-
ucts 40.
Exp er im en ta l Section
products 31a ,b, 33a ,b, 35a ,b, and 37a were isolated
chromatographically. The aromatic ethyl ester 35a , which
is the direct precursor of (()-daurichromenic acid (3), was
isolated in 11% yield.14,15 Following considerable experi-
mentation, it was found that all of these aromatic
o-hydroxy esters could be saponified with an aqueous 5
M solution of sodium hydroxide (∼10 equiv) in dimethyl
sulfoxide (DMSO) on heating at 80 °C for ∼16 h.16
The latter procedure afforded significant quantities of
the desired target compounds, (()-daurichromenic acid
(3) and the analogues 32a ,b, 34a ,b, 36b, and 38a , in
moderate to high yield (38-89%). The saponification
reactions of the methyl and ethyl esters of (()-dau-
richromenic acid have been reported to be problematic
(due to a facile decarboxylation reaction of the product).3,4
In this instance, (()-daurichromenic acid (3) was isolated
in good yield (76%). The spectroscopic data for (()-
daurichromenic acid (3) were in full agreement with those
reported for the natural product.1 Of note and in regard
to the regioselectivity of the Knoevenagel condensation-
electrocyclization reaction, we have not isolated nor do
we have any spectroscopic data of crude reaction products
to indicate that the regioisomeric products 39 were
formed (Figure 5). Similarly, the regioisomeric dehydro-
genation products 40 were not isolated from any of the
reactions.
2,7-Dim eth yl-2-(4,8-d im eth yl-3E,7-n on a d ien yl)-5-oxo-
5,6,7,8-tetr a h yd r o-2H-ch r om en e-6-ca r boxylic Acid Eth yl
Ester (29a ). Rep r esen ta tive P r oced u r e for th e F or m a -
tion of 2H-P yr a n s (27a ,b, 28a ,b, 29b, a n d 30a ). To a
mixture of 1,2-ethylenediamine (20 µL, 0.30 mmol) and acetic
acid (34 µL, 0.59 mmol) in dry methanol (10 mL) was added
the ester 18 (1.16 g, 5.83 mmol) at room temperature. After
30 min, trans,trans-farnesal (4) (1.17 g, 5.30 mmol) was added.
After 3 h, the solvent was removed in vacuo, and the yellow
residue was dissolved in ethyl acetate (20 mL) and washed
with water (2 × 10 mL), a saturated aqueous solution of
sodium bicarbonate (2 × 10 mL), and then brine (10 mL). The
organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and
concentrated in vacuo, and the resultant residue was purified
by flash chromatography using ethyl acetate/hexanes (4%) as
the eluant to afford the title compound 29a (1.85 g, 87%) as a
pale yellow oil: 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6) δ 0.72 (d, J ) 6.4
Hz, 3H), 1.02 (t, J ) 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.10 (s, 3H), 1.57 (apparent
s, 6H), 1.63 (m, 2H), 1.67 (s, 3H), 2.02 (m, 2H), 2.08 (m, 4H),
2.17 (m, 2H), 2.38 (m, 1H), 2.88 (d, J ) 11.6 Hz, 1H), 4.09 (m,
2H), 4.80 (d, J ) 10.1 Hz, 1H), 5.20 (m, 2H), 6.73 (d, J ) 10.1
Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, C6D6) δ (mixture of isomers,
major signals reported) 14.3, 16.0, 17.7, 19.5, 22.7, 23.0, 27.1,
30.8, 35.2, 40.1, 60.6, 60.8, 82.4, 82.5, 109.6, 109.7, 117.0, 117.1,
124.07, 124.11, 124.7, 124.8, 131.31, 131.34, 135.7, 169.8,
170.0, 170.08, 170.13, 188.9, 190.0; IR (ef) 2967, 1739, 1655,
1597, 1415, 1326, 1254, 1157 cm-1; MS (CI) m/z (rel intensity)
401 (M + H, 100); FAB HRMS calcd for C25H36O4 m/z 400.2614,
found m/z 400.2611.
5-H yd r oxy-2,7-d im et h yl-2-(4,8-d im et h yl-3E,7-n on a d i-
en yl)-2H-ch r om en e-6-ca r boxylic Acid Eth yl Ester (35a ).
Rep r esen ta tive P r oced u r e for th e F or m a tion of Ester s
(31a ,b, 33a ,b, 35b, a n d 37a ). To a solution of the ester 29a
(580.0 mg, 1.46 mmol) in benzene (16 mL) was added DDQ
(497.2 mg, 2.20 mmol) at room temperature. The reaction
mixture was then heated at reflux for 16 h. On cooling, the
resultant mixture was filtered through a pad of basic alumina
with ethyl acetate (160 mL). The solvent was removed in
vacuo, and the dark red residue was purified by flash chro-
matography using ethyl acetate/hexanes (2%) as the eluant
to afford the title compound 35a (63.4 mg, 11%) as a yellow
oil: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.39 (s, 3H), 1.40 (t, J ) 7.1
Hz, 3H), 1.56 (s, 3H), 1.59 (s, 3H), 1.67 (s, 3H), 1.65-1.75 (m,
2H), 1.95 (m, 2H), 2.03 (m, 2H), 2.09 (m, 2H), 2.47 (s, 3H),
4.38 (q, J ) 7.1 Hz, 2H), 5.09 (m, 2H), 5.47 (d, J ) 10.1 Hz,
Con clu sion
A modular and concise total synthesis of (()-dau-
richromenic acid 3 has been accomplished in four steps
from trans,trans-farnesal (4) and readily available start-
ing materials (ethyl acetoacetate and ethyl crotonate).
The synthetic route was adapted to prepare a series of
daurichromenic acid analogues in which a variety of
substituents were introduced at C2 and C7. Although the
overall yield of the route is relatively low (in the case of
derivatives that have substituents that incorporate car-
bon-carbon double bonds), significant quantities of
analytically pure materials have been prepared for
subsequent biological evaluation. The results of these
investigations will be reported in due course. It is hoped
that these studies will provide insight into the structure-
activity relationships of this potent anti-HIV lead com-
pound. Further synthetic studies are in progress to
1H), 6.18 (s, 1H), 6.73 (d, J ) 10.1 Hz, 1H), 12.07 (s, 1H); 13
C
NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 14.4, 16.1, 17.8, 22.7, 24.7, 25.8,
26.8, 27.1, 39.8, 41.7, 61.3, 79.8, 105.2, 107.2, 111.8, 117.0,
123.9, 124.5, 126.4, 131.5, 135.6, 142.9, 157.9, 159.9, 172.1;
IR (ef) 3316, 2971, 1650, 1566, 1453, 1377, 1270, 1174 cm-1
;
MS (CI) m/z 399 (M + H, 100), 353 (38), 249 (14), 209 (5). Anal.
Calcd for C25H34O4: C, 75.34; H, 8.60. Found: C, 75.16; H,
8.61.
(14) Hsung and co-workers have reported that the 2H-pyran methyl
ester 7 can be dehydrogenated with DDQ on heating at reflux in
toluene (see Scheme 1). In our hands, these reaction conditions caused
extensive decomposition of the corresponding 2H-pyran ethyl ester 29a
and only a trace amount of the desired aromatic ethyl ester 35a was
isolated; see ref 3.
(15) The aromatic ethyl ester 35a has been prepared previously by
J in and co-workers. Our NMR data (see the Supporting Information)
was completely consistent with the data reported for this compound;
see ref 4 (Supporting Information).
(()-Da u r ich r om en ic Acid (3). Rep r esen ta tive P r oce-
d u r e for th e F or m a tion of Da u r ich r om en ic Acid An a -
logu es (32a ,b, 34a ,b, 36b, a n d 38a ). To a solution of the ester
35a (200.0 mg, 0.503 mmol) in DMSO (3 mL) was added an
aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide (20% w/v, 1.0 mL, 5.0
mmol) at room temperature. The reaction was then heated at
80 °C for 16 h. On cooling, water (2 mL) was added, and the
resultant solution was washed with ether (5 mL). The aqueous
(16) Elix, J . A.; Whitton, A. A. Aust. J . Chem. 1989, 42, 1969.
J . Org. Chem, Vol. 69, No. 11, 2004 3785