cated by formation of isomeric bicyclic acetals.4,5 Intrigued
by the pseudo C2-symmetrical nature of the acetal core of 1
(Figure 1), we believed that a synthetic strategy centered
Before embarking on the synthesis of 24, our investigation
began with the preparation of a range of simple 2-diazo-
acetyl-1,3-dioxanes 11. Following a protocol reported by
Ziegler,9 treatment of a solution of 8a-d (Table 1, entries
Table 1. Preparation 2-Diazoacetyl-1,3-dioxanes 11a
Figure 1.
upon formation of the 5/6 C-C bond would enable us to
set four of the six asymmetric centers within the acetal core
in a single transformation since this disconnection would
generate a meso precursor.6 The retrosynthetic disconnections
which form the basis of this planned synthesis of zaragozic
acid A (1) are illustrated in Scheme 1.
entry
8
R1
R2
Me Me
Et Et
(CH2)4
R3
R4 methoda
11
yield (%)b
1
2
3
4
5
8a
8b
8c
8d Me
8e
H
H
H
H
a, b, d
a, b, d
a, b, d
a, b, d
c, d
11a
11b
11c
11d
11e
61
60
68
80
49
H
H
H
H
H
Me
H
H
H
a Methods: (a) MeCOCO2Me, BF3‚Et2O, CH3CN, rt, 16 h; (b) NaOH,
THF, H2O, reflux, 5 h; (c) (i) MeCOCO2H, Amberlite IR-120, PhH, reflux
16 h; (ii) NaOH, H2O, reflux, 2 h. (d) (i) Et3N, CH2Cl2, -20 °C; (ii)
i-BuOCOCl, -20 °C, 5 min; (iii) CH2N2, Et2O, -20 °C f rt, 16 h. b Overall
yield of 11 from 8 after purification by flash chromatography.
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis
1-4) in acetonitrile with BF3‚Et2O (2 equiv) and methyl
pyruvate (2 equiv) gave 9 which were then saponified to
furnish the corresponding carboxylic acids 10. On the other
hand, substrate 10e (entry 5) was prepared by acid-catalyzed
acetalization of 1,3-propanediol (8e) (1.5 equiv) and pyruvic
acid (1.0 equiv) followed by saponification of the resulting
mixture of ester products.10 Encouragingly, in the case of
8d (entry 4), acetalization provided a single diastereomer in
which the C-2 carboxylate group was found to be in the axial
orientation, trans to the equatorial ring substituents. The
relative configuration of the acetal stereocenter in this case
was determined using 13C NMR spectroscopy, examining
the C-2 methyl group (δ 26.8 ppm) which is known to be
sensitive to the relative configuration of the adjoining acetal.11
Treatment of 10 with Et3N and isobutyl chloroformate now
generated the corresponding mixed anhydrides which, upon
treatment with an ethereal solution of diazomethane, provided
the R-diazo ketones 11 in good yield.12 With a protocol for
the preparation of 11 established, attention now turned to
the C-H insertion. Thus, slow addition of 11a to dirho-
dium(II) tetraacetate (Rh2(O2CCH3)4) (2 mol %) in CH2Cl2
afforded 12a, the product of transannular C-H insertion, in
52% yield together with a small amount of 13a (4%) (Table
2, entry 1). This bicyclic enol ether proved to be rather
Removal of the C-6 O-acyl side chain and disconnection
at C-3/4′ of 1 (Figure 1) leads to 2 which is the relay
compound in Heathcock’s synthesis of 1.7 Further discon-
nection of 2 generates 3 which could be obtained from 4 by
transannular C-H insertion. From this point, the synthetic
problem is now reduced to an exercise in the stereocontrolled
preparation of a symmetrical 1,3-dioxane. Under thermody-
namically controlled conditions, acetalization of 6 or 7 with
pyruvate derivative 5 should favor the diastereomer in which
the C-2 carboxylate group adopts the axial position.8 While
the synthesis of 1 will require us to prepare 6 and address
the introduction of a C-1 side chain other than methyl, our
initial studies have been directed toward the preparation of
24 (Scheme 3) from xylitol derivative 7 and methyl pyruvate
5 (R2 ) Me).
(6) While this work was in progress, Wills and co-workers reported a
related approach to the zaragozic acids based on alkylidene carbene
insertion: Walker, L. F.; Connolly, S.; Wills, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998,
39, 5273-5276.
(7) Stoermer, D.; Caron, S.; Heathcock, C. H. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61,
9115-9125.
(8) 2-Carboxy-1,3-dioxanes display a pronounced preference (∼4 kcal/
mol) for the axially oriented 2-carboxylate group: Bailey, W. F.; Eliel, E.
L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 1798-1806.
(9) Ziegler, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 6857-6860.
(10) Newman, M. S.; Chen, C. C. J. Org. Chem. 1973, 38, 1173-1177.
(11) Gorin, P. A. J.; Mazurek, M.; Iacomini, M.; Duarte, J. H. Carbohydr.
Res. 1982, 100, 1-15.
(12) Plucinska, K.; Liberek, B. Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 3509-3517.
2262
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 15, 2001