1434
B. V. Subba Reddy et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 52 (2011) 1432–1435
Table 2
DEAD-promoted synthesis of
O
O
a-thiocyanatoketones
SCN
NBS
Entry Ketone
Product (3)a
Time Yieldb
+
NH4SCN
(h)
(%)
CH3CN, rt
( )n
n = 1,2,3
( )n
O
O
SCN
O
e
8.0
58
Scheme 2.
a-Thiocyanation of cyclic ketones.
the corresponding
a
-thiocyanoketones in excellent yields (Table 1,
O
entries e and f). Other cyclic ketones, such as cyclohexanone, cyclo-
pentanone, cycloheptanone, 2-methylcyclohexanone and 4-phenyl
cyclohexanone also participated well in this reaction (Table 1, en-
tries g–k, Scheme 2).
In the case of cyclic ketones, the corresponding a-thiocyanatok-
etones were obtained in good yields with high selectivity (Table 1,
SCN
f
8.0
60
MeO
O
MeO
O
SCN
g
10
10
55
65
entries g–k). Remarkably, 2-cyclohexen-1-one also underwent
smooth thiocyanation selectively at
a-position without affecting
O
O
the olefin functionality (Table 1, entry l). Interestingly, acyclic ke-
tone i.e. butan-2-one also gave the respective thiocyanate in 75%
yield (Table 1, entry m). Next we examined the reactivity of various
oxidants, such as PhI(OAc)2, NCS, NIS, DDQ and oxone for this con-
version. Of these, NBS was found to be superior in terms of conver-
sion. For instance, treatment of acetophenone with ammonium
thiocyanate using either 1 equiv of NCS and or NIS over 4 h gave
the thiocyanoketone 3a 75% and 80% yields, respectively. The re-
sults are summarized in Table 1 after optimizing the reaction con-
ditions. The maximum yield of 3a was obtained when the reaction
was carried out using equimolar ratios of ketone, NBS and NH4SCN
(1:1:1).11 The above optimized conditions were then applied for
the thiocyanation of various ketones. It was found that all the reac-
tions proceeded well under mild conditions and gave the corre-
sponding products in good yields (Table 1).
Among various solvents, such as acetonitrile, tetrahydrofuran
and dichloromethane used for this transformation, acetonitrile
proved to be the best solvent. In all cases, the reactions were clean
and free from side products such as nuclear bromination or side
chain bromination. The major advantages of the present method
are high yields, cleaner reaction profiles, operational simplicity
and low cost of the reagents. Mechanistically, we assume that
NBS reacts initially with ammonium thiocyanate to generate elec-
trophilic NTS. Subsequently ketones react rapidly with NTS to give
Me
M
e
SCN
j
O
O
k
9.0
9.0
60
68
Ph
O
SCN
Ph
O
SCN
m
All products were characterized by 1H NMR, IR and mass spectroscopy.
Yield refers to pure products after chromatography.
a
b
venient and cost-effective. This method is applicable for a wide
range of substrates including cyclic and acyclic ketones. DEAD
can also be used for the thiocyanation of enolizable ketones.
Acknowledgements
S.M.S.R. thanks the CSIR, New Delhi for the award of a fellow-
ship. Authors also thank Dr. J. S. Yadav, Director, IICT, Hyderabad
for his kind encouragement and support.
the desired a-thiocyanatoketone (Scheme 3).
References and notes
Inspired by the reactivity of the DEAD in the thiocyanation of
indoles,12 we attempted the thiocyanation of enolizable ketones.
Interestingly, various enolizable ketones underwent smooth thio-
cyanation in the presence of DEAD and ammonium thiocyanate
and the results are presented in Table 2.
In summary, NBS has proved to be a mild and effective reagent
for the thiocyanation of enolizable ketones under neutral condi-
tions. The use of NBS makes this procedure quite simple, more con-
1. (a) Shahidi, F. In Sulphur Compounds in Foods; Mussinan, C. J., Keelan, M. E., Eds.;
American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1994; p 106. Chapter 9; (b) Mehta,
R. G.; Liu, J.; Constantinou, A.; Thomas, C. F.; Hawthorne, M.; You, M.;
Gerhaeusers, C.; Pezzuto, J. M.; Moon, R. C.; Moriarty, R. M. Carcinogenesis 1995,
16, 399; (c) Garson, M. J.; Simpson, J. S.; Flowers, A. E.; Dumdei, E. J. In Studies in
Natural Products Chemistry; Atta-ur-Rahman, Ed.; Elsevier, 2000; Vol. 21, p 329.;
(d) Yasman, Y.; Edrada, R. A.; Wray, V.; Proksch, P. J. Nat. Prod. 2003, 66, 1512.
2. (a) Wood, J. L. Org. React. 1946, 3, 240; (b) Kelly, T. R.; Kim, M. H.; Curtis, A. D. M.
J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 5855; (c) Metzer, J. B. In Comprehensive Heterocyclic
Chemistry; Katritzky, A., Ed.; Pergamon: Oxford, 1984; Vol. 6, p 235; (d) Li, L.;
Ganesh, M.; Seidel, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 11648; (e) Falck, J. R.; Gao, S.;
Prasad, R. N.; Reddy, K. S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 1768.
3. (a) Kodomari, M.; Aoyama, T.; Suzuki, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 1717; (b)
Aoyama, T.; Murata, S.; Arai, I.; Araki, N.; Takido, T.; Suzuki, Y.; Kodomari, M.
Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 3201; (c) Aoyama, T.; Murata, S.; Takido, T.; Kodomari, M.
Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 11933.
O
O
Br-SCN
N
+
NH4
+
N
Br
NH4SCN
+
4. (a) Leblanc, B. L.; Jursic, B. C. Synth. Commun. 1998, 28, 3591; (b) Newman, A. A.
Chemistry and Biochemistry of Thiocyanic Acid and its Derivatives, 1st ed.;
Academic Press, 1975.
O
O
5. Dittmer, D. C. In Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry; Katritzky, A., Ed.;
Pergamon: Oxford, 1984; Vol. 7, p 178.
6. Prakash, O.; Saini, N. Synth. Commun. 1993, 23, 1455.
:
OH
O
O
7. Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, B. V. S.; Srinivas, M. Chem. Lett. 2004, 33, 882.
8. (a) Prakash, O.; Kaur, H.; Batra, H.; Singh, S. P.; Moriarty, R. A. J. Org. Chem. 2001,
66, 2019; (b) Prakash, O.; Rani, N.; Sharma, V.; Moriarty, R. M. Synlett 1997,
1255; (c) Iranpoor, N.; Firouzabadi, H.; Shaterian, H. Synlett 2000, 10, 65.
9. Tanabe, Y.; Makita, T.; Mori, K. Chem. Lett. 1994, 2275.
SCN
+
NH4Br
NCS
N
O
10. (a) Kumar, A.; Ahamd, P.; Maurya, R. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 1399; (b)
Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, B. V. S.; Reddy, U. V. S.; Krishna, A. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007,
Scheme 3. A plausible reaction mechanism.