2510 J ournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2001, Vol. 44, No. 16
Letters
design of selective EAAT substrates and nontransport-
able inhibitors as possible neuroprotective agents.
Ack n ow led gm en t. We thank the European Union
for financial support (CEC BIOTECHNOLOGY PRO-
GRAMME - Demostration Contract CT 98-0223). We
are grateful to E. Bamberg for continuous encourage-
ment and support and N. Watzke for help with the cell
culture and transfection.
Su p p or tin g In for m a tion Ava ila ble: Experimental de-
tails (chemistry, molecular modeling, and pharmacology (ref)),
eqs 1 and 2, Table 1, and figures that portray the determina-
tion of Km values for EAAC1 substrates. This information is
Refer en ces
(1) Michaelis, E. K. Molecular Biology of Glutamate Receptors in
the Central Nervous System and Their Role in Excitotoxicity,
Oxidative Stress and Aging. Prog. Neurobiol. 1998, 54, 369-
415.
(2) Gegelashvili, G.; Schousboe, A. High Affinity Glutamate Trans-
porters: Regulation of Expression and Activity. Mol. Pharmacol.
1997, 52, 6-15.
(3) Takahashi, M.; Billups, B.; Rossi, D.; Sorentis, M.; Hamann, M.;
Attwell, D. The Role of Glutamate Transporters in Glutamate
Homeostasis in the Brain. J . Exp. Biol. 1997, 200, 401-409.
(4) Seal, R. P.; Amara, S. G. Excitatory Amino Acid Transporters:
A Family in Flux. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1999, 39, 431-
456 and references cited therein.
(5) O’Kane, R. L.; Martinez-Lopez, I.; DeJ oseph, M. R.; Vina, J . R.;
Hawkins, R. A. Na+-dependent Glutamate Transporters EAAT1,
EAAT2, and EAAT3 of the Blood-Brain Barrier. J . Biol. Chem.
1999, 274, 31891-31895.
(6) Takamori, S.; Rhee, J . S.; Rosenmund, C.; J ahn, R. Identification
of a Vesicular Glutamate Transporter that Defines a Glutamater-
gic Phenotype in Neurons. Nature 2000, 407, 189-194.
(7) Grewer, C.; Watzke, N.; Wiessner, M.; Rauen, T. Glutamate
Translocation of the Neuronal Glutamate Transporter EAAC1
Occurs within Milliseconds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000,
97, 9706-9711.
(8) Slotboom, D. J .; Konings, W. N.; Lolkema, J . S. Structural
Features of the Glutamate Transporter Family. Microbiol., &
Mol. Biol. Rev. 1999, 63, 293-307.
(9) Coyle, J . T.; Puttfarcken, P. Oxidative Stress, Glutamate, and
Neurodegenerative Disorders. Science 1993, 262, 689-695.
(10) Rossi, D. J .; Oshima, T.; Attwell, D. Glutamate Release in Severe
Brain Ischaemia is Mainly by Reversed Uptake. Nature 2000,
403, 316-321.
(11) Koch, H. P.; Chamberlin, A. R.; Bridges, R. J . Non Transportable
Inhibitors Attenuate Reversal of Glutamate Uptake in Synap-
tosomes Following a Metabolic Insult. Mol. Pharmacol. 1999,
55, 1044-1048.
F igu r e 3. (A) Left panel: Compound 2 is a transported
substrate of EAAC1. Whole-cell currents were evoked by
application of 1 mM glutamate (light gray bar) or 1 mM 2
(white bar) (Vm ) 0 mV, KSCN internal, pH 7.4, T ) 22 °C).
Similar results were obtained for 1a and 1b (not shown).
Middle panel: Compound 3 generates an outward anion
current. The experiment is similar to that shown in the left
panel, but 200 µM 3 was applied (dark gray bar). The light
gray bar indicates application of 10 µM glutamate. Right
panel: Compound 3 is not transported by EAAC1. In the
absence of an electrochemical gradient for anions ([Cl-]i )
[Cl-]o, Vm ) 0 mV), application of 1 mM 3 does not generate
currents in EAAC1. (B): Dose-response relationships of
EAAC1 outward currents generated by compounds 3 (closed
circles) and 4 (triangles) in the absence of glutamate. (C):
Inhibition of EAAC1 by Asp analogues 3 and 4 is competitive.
The circles represent the ratio Ki(S)/Ki. Ki(S) was determined
at 20 µM glutamate. The line is the expected value of Ki(S)/Ki
calculated according to eq 2 (Supporting Information) for a
competitive mechanism with KS ) 5.1 µM.
(12) Koch, H. P.; Kavanaugh, M. N. P.; Esslinger, C. S.; Zerangue,
N.; Humphrey, J . M.; Amara, S. G.; Chamberlain, A. R.; Bridges,
R. J . Differentiation of Substrates and Nonsubstrates Inhibitors
of the High-Affinity, Sodium-Dependent Glutamate Transport-
ers. Mol. Pharmacol. 1999, 56, 1095-1104.
Con clu sion . In summary, we disclosed the rational
design of novel and potent glutamate and aspartate
analogues selectively interacting with electrogenic
glutamate transporters, as potent and selective EAAT
substrates and nontransportable inhibitors. The new
substrates (1a ,b and 2) described in this Letter potently
interact with EAAC1, they are transported with the
same turnover rate as Glu, and unlike all the other
known substrates, they are characterized by weak-to-
negligible affinity for iGluRs. On the other hand, this
rational approach led to the identification of 3, a potent
and selective oxazoline-based blocker, the first charac-
terized by the lack of a free amine function to be
protonated at physiological pH, providing further in-
sights on the role played by this function in the
interaction with the EAAT binding site. Starting from
our binding site interaction models and the new leads,
these studies may pave the way for future rational
(13) SYBYL Molecular Modeling System (version 6.6), Tripos Assoc.,
St. Louis, MO.
(14) Inight 98, Discover module, MSI, San Diego, CA.
(15) (a) Wipf P.; Xu W. Total Synthesis of the Antimitotic Marine
Natural Product (+)-Curacin A. J . Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 6556-
6562. (b) Wipf, P.; Miller, C. P. A Short, Stereospecific Synthesis
of Dihydrooxazoles from Serine and Threonine Derivatives.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 907-910.
(16) Williams, D. R.; Lowder, P. D.; Gu, Y.; Brooks, D. A. Studies of
Mild Dehydrogenations in Heterocyclic Systems. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1997, 38, 331-334.
(17) Cardillo, G.; Gentilucci, L.; Tolomelli, A.; Tomasini, C. A Practical
Method for the Synthesis of -Amino -Hydroxy Acids. Synthesis
of Enantiomerically Pure Hydroxyaspartic Acid and Isoserine.
Synth. Lett. 1999, 11, 1727-1730.
(18) (a) Evans, D. L.; Minstewr, D. K.; J ordis, U. Nickel Peroxide
Dehydrogenation of Oxygen-, Sulfur-, and Nitrogen- Containing
Heterocycles. J . Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 497-501. (b) Oh, K. S.;
Lee, C.-W.; Choi, S. H.; Lee, J . S.; Kim, K. S. Origin of the High
Affinity and Selectivity of Novel Receptors for NH4+ over K+:
Charged Hydrogen Bonds vs Cation-p Interaction. Org. Lett.
2000, 2, 2679-2681.
J M015509Z