En a n tioselective Syn th esis of a n Azir id in om itosa n e a n d Selective
F u n ction a liza tion s of a Key In ter m ed ia te
Nikolaos Papaioannou, J arred T. Blank, and Scott J . Miller*
Department of Chemistry, Merkert Chemistry Center, Boston College,
Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02467-3860
scott.miller.1@bc.edu
Received December 23, 2002
An enantioselective synthesis of mitosane core (-)-1 has been achieved. Key steps include a rapid
assembly of a key eight-membered-ring intermediate employing ring-closing metathesis. Kinetic
resolution of an advanced secondary alcohol was then accomplished by using a peptide-based
asymmetric acyl transfer catalyst that was discovered from a parallel screen of catalyst candidates.
Optically pure material was then converted to the mitosane core, which was the subject of additional
studies on the selective modification to produce several substituted compounds containing a mitosane
ring system.
In tr od u ction 1
related to synthesis and cancer.5-7 Synthetic studies on
the mitomycins continue to provide new insights on these
significant targets. Total syntheses of members of
the class including several mitomycins and the related
FR900482/FR66979 structures have been reported by the
Kishi,8 Fukuyama,9 Danishefsky,10 Martin,11 and Terash-
ima12 laboratories. Most recently total syntheses have
also been reported by Fukuyama,9d Williams,13 Ciufo-
lini,14 and Rapoport.15 In addition, many other important
advances have been reported.16 In this paper, we report
the results of our studies in this area in the context of
the enantioselective preparation of a mitosane core,17 as
well as further studies on the selective modification of
The application of asymmetric catalytic methods in the
context of complex molecule total synthesis constitutes
both a historic approach and a frontier for organic syn-
thesis. While the field of catalytic reaction development
strives for wide substrate generality, very often in the
context of a specific intermediate required for a total syn-
thesis, a given reaction may proceed less selectively. In
concert with a simultaneous interest in developing pro-
tocols for rapid catalyst discovery, and in the synthesis
of the mitomycin family of natural products, we em-
barked upon a synthesis of mitomycin-like molecules. Our
goal was to test catalyst discovery methodology in the
context of a target-oriented study, rather than in a more
general methodological mode.2-4 If rapid discovery pro-
tocols could be employed in this arena, this strategy could
prove useful in the context of both target-oriented and
diversity-oriented synthesis. Successful application of
such methodology could raise the possibility of introduc-
ing asymmetric catalysts at the “kit-level” such that
families of catalysts could be readily available for screen-
ing against synthetic intermediates in the context of a
variety of targets of interest.
(5) (a) Carter, S. K.; Crooke, S. T. Mitomycin C, Current Status and
New Developments; Academic Press: New York, 1979. (b) Remers, W.
A.; Iyengar, B. S. In Cancer Chemotherapeutic Agents; Foye, W. O.,
Ed.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1995; pp 584-592.
(6) Tomasz, M.; Lipman, R.; Chowdary, D.; Pawlak, J .; Verdine, G.;
Nakanishi, K. Science 1987, 235, 1204-1208.
(7) Gargiulo, D.; Musser, S. S.; Yang, L.; Fukuyama, T.; Tomasz,
M. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 9388-9398.
(8) For a review of the Kishi Laboratory’s synthetic studies, see:
Kishi, Y. J . Nat. Prod. 1979, 42, 549-568.
(9) (a) Fukuyama, T.; Yang, L. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 8303-
8304. (b) Fukuyama, T.; Yang, L. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 7881-
7882. (c) Fukuyama, T.; Xu, L.; Goto, S. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114,
383-385. (d) Suzuki, M.; Kambe, M.; Tokuyama, H.; Fukuyama, T.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 4686-4688.
(10) Danishefsky, S. J .; Schkeryantz, J . M. Synlett 1995, 475-490.
This paper also provides an excellent bibliography to the mitomycin
literature.
The mitomycin antitumor agents continue to be of
interest in the context of chemical and biological studies
(11) Fellows, I. M.; Kaelin, D. E., J r.; Martin, S. F. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 10781-10787.
(1) This work is taken in part from the Ph.D. Dissertation of
Nikolaos Papaioannou, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467.
(2) J andeleit, B.; Schaefer, D. J .; Powers, T. S.; Turner, H. W.;
Weinberg, W. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2494-2532.
(3) For several recent reviews of combinatorial catalysis, see: (a)
Crabtree, R. H. Chem. Commun. 1999, 17, 1611. (b) Kuntz, K. W.;
Snapper, M. L.; Hoveyda, A. H. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1999, 3, 313-
319. (c) Fransis, M. B.; J amison, T. F.; J acobsen, E. N. Curr. Opin.
Chem. Biol. 1998, 2, 422-428.
(12) (a) Katoh, T.; Itoh, E.; Yoshino, T.; Terashima, S. Tetrahedron
1997, 53, 10229-10238. (b) Yoshino, T.; Nagata, Y.; Itoh, E.; Hash-
imoto, M.; Katoh, T.; Terashima, S. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 10239-
10252. (c) Katoh, T.; Nagata, Y.; Yoshino, T.; Nakatani, S.; Terashima,
S. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 10253-10270.
(13) Williams, R. M.; J udd, T. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41,
4683-4685.
(14) Ciufolini, M. A.; Ducray, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41,
4688-4691.
(4) For reviews of catalytic kinetic resolution see: (a) Keith, J . M.;
Larrow, J . F.; J acobsen, E. N. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2001, 343, 5-26. (b)
Hoveyda, A. H.; Didiuk, M. T. Curr. Org. Chem. 1998, 2, 489-526.
(15) Paleo, M. R.; Aurrecoechea, N.; J ung, K.-Y.; Rapoport, H. J .
Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 130-138.
10.1021/jo0269013 CCC: $25.00 © 2003 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 02/25/2003
2728
J . Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 2728-2734