flux)18,19 then yielded cyclooctene 7 in 83% yield. Reduction
of ketone 7 (LiAlH4, 0 °C) proceeded in quantitative yield
to give allylic alcohol 3 in racemic form.
Scheme 1
Scheme 2a
prove generally useful in the context of target-oriented
synthesis because chiral secondary alcohols so often figure
in target retrosyntheses.
Our retrosynthetic analysis is predicated on the expectation
that aminal-ether 1 could be accessed through an ap-
propriately functionalized eight-membered ring (Scheme 1).
We envisioned that allylic alcohol (-)-3 could be obtained
in optically pure form from the racemate, provided we could
rapidly identify an enantioselective catalyst for kinetic
resolution. For this goal, we planned to screen catalysts from
a peptide-based library of candidates.13
a (a) Ethylene glycol, TsOH, PhCh3, reflux; (b) BOC2O, DMAP,
Et3N, CH2Cl2, 25 °C; (c) NaOH, THF/H2O, reflux; (d) allyl bromide,
NaH, DMF, 0 °C to rt; (e) NaOH, THF/H2O, reflux; (f)
MeNH(OMe), EDC, CH2Cl2, 25 °C; (g) vinyl magnesium bromide,
THF, 0 °C; (h) LiAlH4, Et2O, 0 °C.
The synthesis of 3 was realized as follows. Isatin was
converted to the ethylene-bridged ketal upon treatment with
ethylene glycol and TsOH (PhCH3, reflux; 99%).14 The
indolinic nitrogen was then converted to the BOC-protected
aniline under standard conditions (86%).15 Saponification
(99%) was followed by simultaneous allylation of the aniline
and carboxylic acid functional group by treatment with allyl
bromide and sodium hydride (87%) to provide ester 4 in
73% overall yield (four steps). Vinyl ketone 5 was then
obtained by a three-step sequence wherein ester 4 was
subjected to hydrolysis (NaOH, THF/H2O; 99%) and conver-
sion to the intermediate Weinreb amide (64%).16 Addition
of vinylmagnesium bromide under carefully controlled
conditions (THF, 0 °C) to avoid conjugate addition of the
expelled MeNH(OMe)17 was achieved to afford 5 in 99%
yield (63% from 4, three steps). Ring-closing metathesis
employing the Ru-alkylidene 6 (10 mol %, CH2Cl2, re-
We then turned our attention to the identification of a
catalyst for the kinetic resolution of 3 (eq 1). Since compound
3 does not bear close resemblance to substrates we had
studied previously,13 we sought to screen a diverse set of
catalyst candidates; we prepared 152 peptides of the general
structure 8 (Figure 1a).20 Screening of the unpurified catalysts
at room temperature for kinetic resolution of compound 3
21
resulted in selectivity factors (kfast/kslow
)
that ranged from
1 to 10 (Figure 1b). Catalyst 9 in particular proved to be
promising and was therefore purified to homogeneity for
further study. We then found that when the resolution was
conducted at 0 °C and in the presence of Et3N (6 equiv), the
observed krel value improved to 27. From a practical point
of view, recovered alcohol 3 can be obtained in high optically
purity (90% ee, 53% conv), with isolated yields of >40%
(theoretical ) 47%).22 A single recrytallization affords 3 in
>99% ee.
The stereochemical identitity of the slow reacting enan-
tiomer was established by conversion of the recovered
(10) Jandeleit, B.; Schaefer, D. J.; Powers, T. S.; Turner, H. W.;
Weinberg, W. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2494-2532.
(11) For several recent reviews of combinatorial catalysis, see: (a) Kuntz,
K. W.; Snapper, M. L.; Hoveyda, A. H. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1999, 3,
313-319. (b) Francis, M. B.; Jamison, T. F.; Jacobsen, E. N. Curr. Opin.
Chem. Biol. 1998, 2, 422-428.
(18) (a) Scholl, M.; Trnka, T. M.; Morgan, J. P.; Grubbs, R. H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 2247-2250. (b) Trnka, T. M.; Grubbs, R. H.
Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 18-29.
(12) For reviews of catalytic kinetic resolution, see: (a) Keith, J. M.;
Larrow, J. F.; Jacobsen, E. N. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2001, 343, 5-26. (b)
Hoveyda, A. H.; Didiuk, M. T. Curr. Org. Chem. 1998, 2, 537-574.
(13) (a) Copeland, G. T.; Miller, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
6496-6502. (b) Jarvo, E. R.; Copeland, G. T.; Papaioannou, N.; Bonitatebus,
P. J.; Miller, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 11638-11643.
(14) Rajopadhye, M.; Popp, F. D. J. Med. Chem. 1988, 31, 1001-1005.
(15) Flynn, D. L.; Zelle, R. E.; Grieco, P. A. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48,
2424-2426.
(19) For recent reviews of RCM, see: (a) Grubbs, R. H.; Chang, S.
Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 4413-4450. (b) Fuerstner, A. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2000, 39, 3012-3043. For related RCM reactions in mitomycin model
systems, see: (c) Martin, S. F.; Wagman, A. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995,
36, 1169-1170. (d) Miller, S. J.; Kim, S. H.; Chen, Z.-R.; Grubbs, R. H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 2108-2109.
(20) The identity of each catalyst and the general procedure for their
syntheses may be found in the Supporting Information.
(21) Kagan, H. B.; Fiaud, J. C. Top. Stereochem. 1988, 18, 249-330.
(22) The screening experiments, exclusive of peptide synthesis, were
accomplished in 4 days.
(16) Nahm, S.; Weinreb, S. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 3815-3818.
(17) Gomtsyan, A. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 11-13.
2880
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 18, 2001