Hantzsch synthesis of thiazoles and thiazolo[5,4ꢀb]indoles Russ.Chem.Bull., Int.Ed., Vol. 56, No. 7, July, 2007
1445
Table 3. 1H NMR spectroscopic data for a mixture of the
major (5gmaj) and minor conformers (5gmin) of 4ꢀacetylꢀ2ꢀbenꢀ
zylꢀ8bꢀhydroxyꢀ3a,8bꢀdihydroꢀ2Hꢀthiazolo[5,4ꢀb]indole 5g
eluent; visualization was carried out with UV light and iodine
vapor. The melting points of compounds 3b15 and 6c18 are conꢀ
sistent with those described earlier.
2
2ꢀ(R3R4CH)ꢀ4ꢀR1ꢀ4ꢀHydroxyꢀ∆ ꢀthiazolines (5a,b,d—f),
4ꢀacetylꢀ2ꢀbenzylꢀ8bꢀhydroxyꢀ3a,8bꢀdihydroꢀ4Hꢀthiazoꢀ
lo[5,4ꢀb]indole (5g), and 2ꢀcyanoꢀ4ꢀphenylmethylthiazole (6c)
(general procedure). Method A. Bromo ketone 1a—c (10 mmol)
was added to a solution of the corresponding thioamide 4a—e
(10 mmol) and Et3N (2.02 g, 20 mmol) in acetone (20 mL). The
reaction solution was stirred at 20 °C for 30 min and then diluted
with water (30 mL). The crystals that precipitated were filtered
off, washed with aqueous acetone (1 : 1), and recrystallized
from PriOH, and compounds 5a,b,d—g were obtained (see
Tables 1—3). After dilution of the reaction mixture with water,
thiazole 6c was extracted with dichloromethane (3×15 mL).
The extract was washed with water and dried with Na2SO4. The
solvent was removed in vacuo, and the residue was recrystallized
from a 5 : 1 petroleum ether—benzene mixture in the presence
of activated carbon. Compound 6c was obtained in a yield of
1.12 g (55%), m.p. 42—44 °C (cf. lit. data18: m.p. 42—44 °C).
Found (%): C, 65.91; H, 4.08; N, 13.89; S, 15.94. C11H8N2S.
Calculated (%): C, 66.00; H, 4.00; N, 14.00; S, 16.00. MS (FAB,
70 eV, m/z): 200 [M]+.
Comꢀ
pound
δ (J/Hz)
H(5) H(3a) С(2)H2 NCOMe
H(6)—H(8)
(m)
(s) (s)
5gmaj
5gmin
7.15—7.55
8.06
(d)
6.32 3.84, 3.79 2.17
(q, 2 H,
2J = 16.0)
7.15—7.55 7.15—7.55 5.80 3.77 (br) 2.40
consequently, on the structure of the starting thioamide.
The Me, Ar, and Het substituents impede dehydraꢀ
tion, whereas substituents containing the αꢀmethylene
(methine) unit at the C(2) atom substantially facilitates
this process.
To summarize, we developed a twoꢀstep procedure for
the preparation of thiazoles and 2ꢀRꢀthiazolo[5,4ꢀb]inꢀ
doles, whose synthesis is difficult or impossible under the
standard conditions. The first step resulting in the formaꢀ
tion of hydroxythiazolines can be performed under rather
mild conditions (see above), whereas the second rateꢀ
determining step should be carried out either under drasꢀ
tic conditions of acid catalysis (for example, according to
the procedure described earlier13 by prolonged heating in
toluene in the presence of pꢀtoluenesulfonic acid) or unꢀ
der conditions favorable for dehydration of intermediate
hydroxythiazolines by the E1cbꢀtype mechanism (in the
presence of an appropriate base accompanied by the transꢀ
formation of the hydroxy group into a good leaving group).
In our opinion, the latter approach is preferable. For exꢀ
ample, it is known that 2ꢀmethylꢀ4ꢀphenylthiazole 6a is
produced by the Hantzsch reaction not only under acid
catalysis but also in the presence of alkalis.12 Apparently,
the modification of this method would also be useful when
the Hantzsch reaction is inhibited in an acidic medium.
Method B. A suspension of hydrobromide 2e (1.50 g,
3.70 mmol) and NaOAc (0.61 g, 7.40 mmol) in dioxane (12 mL)
and water (5 mL) was stirred without heating for 15 min.
The resulting emulsion was diluted with water (30 mL)
and stirred for 5 min. The precipitate was filtered off and
washed with water. Compound 5g was obtained in a yield of
1.03 g (86%).
4ꢀR1ꢀ2ꢀ(R3R4CH)ꢀ5ꢀR2ꢀThiazoles 6b,d—f (general proceꢀ
dure). Method A. Thioamide 4b,d,e (10 mmol) was dissolved on
heating in PriOH (30 mL). Then compound 1a (1.91 g, 10 mmol)
or compound 1c (1.99 g, 10 mmol) was added to the solution.
The reaction mixture was refluxed for 3 min (in the case of 1a,
for 15 min) and cooled. Aqueous NH3 was added to the reaction
mixture to pH = 8, and then water (30 mL) was added. The
crystals that precipitated were filtered off and recrystallized from
PriOH. The yields of compounds 6b, 6d, and 6e were 2.13 g
(85%), 2.35 g (81%), and 2.55 g (78%), respectively. In the case
of thiazole 6f, the solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue
was recrystallized from aqueous PriOH. Compounds 6b,d—f were
prepared (see Tables 1 and 2).
Method B. The corresponding 4ꢀR1ꢀ2ꢀ(R3R4CH)ꢀhydroxyꢀ
Experimental
2
∆ ꢀthiazoline 5b,d—f (5 mmol) and concentrated (d
=
1.18 g mL–1) HCl (0.45 mL, 5 mmol) in PriOH (3.5 mL) were
added to PriOH (12 mL). The reaction solution was refluxed for
1 min (in the case of compound 5f, for 15 min). Aqueous NH3
was added to the reaction mixture to pH = 8, and then water
(20 mL) was added. The crystals that precipitated were filtered
off and washed with water. The yields of compounds 6b, 6d, 6e,
and 6f were 1.00 g (80%), 1.23 g (85%), 1.36 g (83%), and 0.90 g
(74%), respectively.
4ꢀAcetylꢀ2ꢀbenzylꢀ8bꢀhydroxyꢀ3a,8bꢀdihydroꢀ4Hꢀthiazoꢀ
lo[5,4ꢀb]indole hydrobromide (2e). Bromo ketone 1b (2.54 g,
10 mmol) was added to a solution of thioamide 4b (1.51 g,
10 mmol) in acetone (30 mL) at 20 °C. The reaction mixture
was stirred for 20 min. The crystals were filtered off and
washed with acetone. Compound 2e was obtained in a yield of
3.85 g (95%), m.p. 162—165 °C (decomp.). Found (%): C, 53.29;
H, 4.20; N, 7.02; S, 7.98. C18H16N2O2S•HBr. Calculated (%):
The elemental analysis for C, H, N, S was carried out on an
EAꢀ1108 analyzer (CHNS/O, TDK detector). The 1H NMR
spectra were measured on a Varian Unity+400 spectrometer
(400 MHz) in DMSOꢀd6. The EI mass spectra were obtained on
a Finnigan SSQꢀ710 instrument by the direct injection of samples
into the ion source (the ionizing electron energy was 70 eV, the
temperature of the ionization chamber was 150 °C, samples
were heated to 350 °C, the heating rate was 163 deg min–1) and
by the FAB method in the oꢀnitrobenzyl alcohol matrix (xenon
as the ionization gas). The IR spectra were recorded on a
Perkin—Elmer 457 instrument (Nujol mulls). The course of the
reactions and the purity of the compounds were monitored by
TLC on Silufol UVꢀ254 plates (before chromatography of comꢀ
pounds 5a,b,d,e, the plates were kept in Et3N vapor for 3 min)
using a 20 : 1 : 3 chloroform—acetone—hexane mixture as the