894
Russ.Chem.Bull., Int.Ed., Vol. 50, No. 5, May, 2001
Dushenko et al.
c = 34.8492(12) Å, α = 90.0°, β = 90.0°, γ = 90.0°,
V = 6802.0(4) Å3, Z = 8, dcalc = 1.657 g cm3. The X-ray
diffraction data were collected on a Bruker SMART diffracto-
meter equipped with a CCD detector (T = 293(2) K, graphite
monochromator, Mo-Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å). The absorp-
tion coefficient was 4.881 mm1; F(000) 3344; θ 2.2029.03°;
the limiting indices 14 ≤ h ≤ 13, 15 ≤ k ≤ 23, 47 ≤ l ≤ 45;
36579 measured reflections; 8320 independent reflections
(Rint 0.0549); semiempirical absorption correction from ψ scans;
maximum and minimum transmissions were 0.284 and 0.202,
respectively. The refinement was performed by the least-squares
method using 8221 reflections; 0 restraints, 425 parameters
refined, GOOF based on F 2 was 1.268; the final R factors using
reflections with I > 2σ(I) were R1 = 0.0853, wR2 = 0.1655; the
R factors based on all data were R1 = 0.0937, wR2 = 0.1705,
∆fmax = 2.225, 1.369 e/Å3. The hydrogen atoms were placed
in geometrically calculated positions and refined using the
riding model. The selected lengths and bond angles in the
structure of 2c are given in Table 1. The atomic coordinates,
bond lengths, bond angles, and thermal parameters were depos-
ited with the Cambridge Structural Database.
To summarize, the Tl atom in complexes 2 is coor-
dinated in a polydentate fashion by the "hard" donor,
viz., by the side-chain N atom of the amidine moiety,
and by the "soft" donor, viz., by the π system of the Cp
ring (η5-bonding). This mode of coordination of the
thallium atom has not been observed previously in
related compounds. Such an unusual coordination is
favored by the fact that the plane of the amidine frag-
ment adopting the Z configuration is perpendicular to
the plane of the Cp ring due to the presence of the
bulky methoxycarbonyl and aryl substituents. The high
energy barrier hinders rotation of the α-naphthyl or
o-substituted aryl groups about the CC bond of the
amidine moiety. All these factors are responsible for the
stability of the chiral structures of thallium derivatives 2.
Experimental
The 1H NMR spectra of solutions of the complexes
(0.05 mol L1) were recorded on a Bruker AM spectrometer
operating at 300 MHz. The 13C NMR spectra of solutions of
the complexes (0.5 mol L1) were measured on a Âruker AM
spectrometer operating at 75.47 MHz with Me4Si as the inter-
nal standard. The IR spectra were recorded on a Specord IR-75
instrument in Nujol mulls. The mass spectra were measured on
an HP 5995 A spectrometer (direct inlet of the sample,
EI, 70 eV, 60 °C). Methanol and benzene were purified accord-
ing to standard procedures.8
N,N´-diaryl-N-thallium-benz(α-naphth)amidinium-
N´-[2,3,4,5-tetra(methoxycarbonyl)cyclopentadien-1-yl]ides
(2ac) (general procedure). Ylide 1 (5 mmol), which was
obtained according to a procedure reported previously,9 was
added to a solution of freshly prepared TlOH 10 (5 mmol) in
MeOH (80 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at 40 °C for
1 h. Then the solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue was
crystallized by hot filtration from benzene (2a) or MeOH (2b
and 2c). The yields were 8587%. Yellow crystals, m.p.
208209 °C (2a), 186187 °C (2b), and 237238 °C (2c).
13C NMR (CDCl3), δ. 2a: 20.1, 20.4 (Me); 51.1, 51.4,
51.5, 51.9 (OMe); 106.1, 112.7, 114.8, 121.8 (C(1)C(5),
Cpring.); 122.3, 124.4, 125.6, 125.6, 125.8, 126.4, 128.0, 128.2,
128.8, 129.1, 129.3, 130.0, 131.4, 131.9, 132.4, 134.8, 140.9,
143.5 (Ar); 161.4 (NCN); 164.5, 165.6, 166.3, 167.9 (C=O).
2b: 20.4, 20.6 (Me); 51.0, 51.4, 51.5, 51.9 (OMe); 105.5, 113.4,
114.2, 122.6 (C(1)C(5), Cpring.); 122.6, 125.8, 125.9, 128.2,
128.4, 128.8, 129.1, 129.9, 131.7, 132.1, 132.3, 133.3,
135.0, 140.7, 142.8 (Ar); 159.4 (NCN); 164.3, 165.3, 166.1,
168.0 (C=O).
This work was financially supported by the Russian
Foundation for Basic Research (Project Nos. 98-03-
33062, 99-03-33505, and 00-15-97320).
References
1. G. A. Dushenko, I. E. Mikhailov, O. E. Kompan,
A. Zschunke, G. Reck, B. Schulz, C. Mugge, and V. I.
Minkin, Mendeleev Commun., 1997, 127.
2. G. A. Dushenko, I. E. Mikhailov, A. Zschunke, G. Reck,
B. Schulz, C. Mugge, and V. I. Minkin, Mendeleev Commun.,
1999, 67.
3. P. Jutzi and U. Siemeling, J. Organomet. Chem., 1995,
500, 175.
4. P. Jutzi and J. DahlHaus, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1994, 137, 179.
5. A. A. H. Zeijden, J. Organomet. Chem., 1996, 518, 147.
6. M. I. Bruce and A. H. White, Aust. J. Chem., 1990, 43, 949.
7. V. I. Minkin, I. E. Mikhailov, G. A. Dushenko, I. A.
Yudilevich, R. M. Minyaev, A. Zschunke, and C. Mugge,
J. Phys. Org. Chem., 1991, 4, 31.
8. Organic Solvents. Physical Properties and Methods of Purifi-
cation, Ed. A. Weissberger, Interscience Publ., New
YorkLondon, 1955.
9. I. E. Mikhailov, O. E. Kompan, G. A. Dushenko, and V. I.
Minkin, Mendeleev Commun., 1991, 121.
10. Handbuch der präparativen anorganischen Chemie,
Ed. von G. Brauer, Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart, 1978.
X-ray diffraction analysis of complex 2c. Crystals of 2c
(C35H32ClN2O8Tl) are orthorhombic, M = 848.45, space
group Pbca, at 20 °C a = 10.9598(4), b = 17.8091(6),
Received February 15, 2001