7366 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 66, No. 22, 2001
Adam et al.
Sch em e 1. Syn th etic Rou te to th e
4,6-Did eoxyfu r a n oses 10
gen source instead of tert-butyl hydroperoxide was neces-
sary to sustain the titanium catalytic cycle10) under
titanium catalysis gave the tetrahydrofurans 7 as major
products, but no epoxides 5 nor tetrahydropyrans 8 were
obtained (Table 1, entries 1 and 6). Evidently, the
erythro-5 epoxide was immediately converted to the
tetrahydrofuran 7 during the reaction. The direct epoxi-
dation of the hydroperoxides 2, catalyzed by Ti(OiPr)4,
is not desirable because much (ca. 30%) reduction to the
diols 4 is observed.
The vanadium-catalyzed oxidation14 of the like-diol 4a
with tert-butyl hydroperoxide gave essentially exclusively
the tetrahydrofuran 7a in 78% yield of isolated material
(entry 2), and only traces of the enone 6. In contrast,
under the same reaction conditions, the oxidation of the
unlike-diol 4b led to the (RR*,1R*,3S*)-5b epoxide as
major product (entry 7), which was isolated in 42% yield
when neutral conditions were carefully maintained. Also
a significant (30%) amount of tetrahydrofuran 7b was
formed. The latter was obtained as the exclusive product,
when the vanadium-catalyzed reaction was conducted at
45 °C for 10 h (entry 8). Thereby, the tetrahydrofuran
7b was isolated in 82% yield after silica gel chromatog-
raphy.
The oxidation of the diols 4a and 4b with methyltri-
oxorhenium (MTO) and UHP (urea/hydrogen peroxide
adduct) led to the tetrahydrofuran 7 and tetrahydropyran
8 products in a ratio of 65:35, together with small (4-
6%) amounts of enone 6 (entries 3 and 9). NMR monitor-
ing of the oxidation showed that initially a mixture of
the diastereomeric epoxides was observed (65:35 in favor
of the erythro-5 epoxide), which was slowly converted to
a mixture of tetrahydrofuran 7 and tetrahydropyran 8.
The oxidation of the like-diol 4a with mCPBA15 (entry
4) gave the tetrahydrofuran 7a as major product (69%)
and minor amounts (23%) of tetrahydropyran 8a , as well
as a small quantity of a mixture of the diastereomeric
epoxides 5a (8%). NMR monitoring of the reaction
progress showed only a moderate diastereoselectivity (ca.
80:20) for the erythro-5a and threo-5a epoxides. In
contrast, the oxidation of the unlike-diol 4b by mCPBA
gave a mixture of the epoxides erythro-5b and threo-5b
as major products (71%) in a erythro/ threo ratio of 96:4
(entry 10). At the beginning of the reaction, a diastere-
omeric ratio of 81:19 was determined by NMR spectros-
copy for the epoxides 5b. Also, significant amounts of the
tetrahydrofuran 7b (16%) and tetrahydropyran 8b (13%)
were isolated, as well as traces of the enone 6.
(PhMe2Si)3ZnLi, attacks the triple bond from the less
crowded side cis-selectively to give the E-configured
5-dimethylphenylsilyl-4-hexen-2-ol (1) in high regiose-
lectivity and in a 66% yield of isolated material. Only
8% of the regioisomeric E-4-dimethylphenylsilyl-4-hexen-
2-ol was formed.
Photooxygenation of the homoallylic alcohol 1 with
tetraphenylporphyrin (TPP) as sensitizer (Scheme 2) gave
the diastereomeric hydroperoxy alcohols 2 in high yield
(90%). The silyl group at the double bond in the homoal-
lylic alcohol 1 directs the H abstraction regioselectively
to the gem allylic position in the singlet-oxygen ene
reaction (gem effect).7,12 Only traces (<5%) of the regio-
isomeric hydroperoxide 2′ were produced, which im-
mediately decomposed to the enone 3 and dimethylphen-
ylsilanol. The diastereomeric hydroperoxy alcohols 2a
(like) and 2b (unlike) were obtained as a 50:50 mixture,
the lack of diastereoselectivity in this photooxygenation
is due to the absence of 1,3-allylic strain.9b,13
The diastereomers 2a and 2b could not be separated
by silica gel chromatography; nevertheless, after reduc-
tion by triphenylphosphine to the diastereomeric diols
4a (like) and 4b (unlike), these were isolated individually
by silica gel chromatography in a total yield of 91%
(Scheme 2). For convenience, the photooxygenation of the
homoallylic alcohol 1 and reduction of the hydroperoxide
product 2 may be conducted in an one-pot process to
afford the diol 4 in 90% overall yield; one tedious
purification step is thereby obviated.
Various oxidants were tested for the epoxidation of the
diols 4a and 4b. Besides the expected epoxides 5, some
enone 6 and also the tetrahydrofuran 7 and tetrahydro-
pyran 8 products (intramolecular nucleophilic attack on
the epoxide ring) were obtained (Scheme 3). The product
composition depended on the oxidant and the reaction
conditions; the results are summarized in Table 1.
The oxidation of the like-diol 4a and the unlike-diol
4b with 2,3-dimethyl-3-hydroperoxy-2-butanol (this oxy-
Ethane carboperoxoic acid, which was used to provide
mild and nonacidic oxidation conditions (after oxygen
transfer the resulting carbonic acid decomposes into the
neutral CO2 and ethanol),16 epoxidized the diols 4 in low
diastereoselectivity (dr ca. 60:40, entries 5 and 11). In
the oxidation of the like-diol 4a , 52% of the diastereo-
meric epoxides 5a and a total of 48% of the tetrahydro-
furan 7a (40%) and tetrahydropyran 8a (8%) were
obtained (entry 5). Moreover, a small amount of the enone
6 (2%) was detected. After two weeks at room tempera-
ture (20 °C), the crude reaction mixture had transformed
quantitatively to the cyclic products 7a and 8a in a ratio
(14) Itoh, T.; J itsukawa, K.; Kaneda, K.; Teranishi, S. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1979, 101, 159-169.
(12) Adam, W.; Saha-Mo¨ller, C. R.; Schmid, K. S. J . Org. Chem.
2000, 65, 1431-1433.
(13) Adam, W.; Saha-Mo¨ller, C. R.; Schambony, S. B.; Schmid, K.
S.; Wirth, T. Photochem. Photobiol. 1999, 70, 476-483.
(15) Adam, W.; Griesbeck, A. G.; Wang, X. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1992,
193-197.
(16) Ru¨sch gen. Klaas, M.; Warwel, S. Synth. Commun. 1998, 28,
251-260.