Retro-Ene Reactions in Acylallene Derivatives
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 63, No. 8, 1998 2625
of G2(MP2)34 theory but computationally more efficient. The
frozen-core approximation was employed for all correlated
calculations. Zero-point vibrational energy calculations were
performed at the HF/6-31G* level.
the latter.4c While all these reactions can be termed
pseudopericyclic, the tremendous effects of ketenes (com-
pared with allenes) and halogens as well as other
electron-donating lone-pair groups on lowering the acti-
vation barriers are due to better HOMO-LUMO interac-
tion terms,4b which can also be expressed in terms of the
nucleophilicity and electrophilicity of the reacting cen-
ters.5
Other things being equal, we then expect lower activa-
tion barriers for ketenes than for allenes and much lower
barriers for the transfer of lone-pair groups than hydro-
gen atoms.
Gen er a l E xp er im en t a l Met h od s. Preparative flash
vacuum thermolysis (FVT) was carried out in electrically
heated quartz tubes, 40 cm long, of 2 cm diameter. Samples
were vaporized or sublimed into the pyrolysis tube using a
Bu¨chi sublimation oven. The system was evacuated to ca. 10-5
mbar and continuously pumped during FVT using a Leybold-
Heraeus turbomolecular pump PT150. The thermolysates
were cocondensed with or without MeOH vapor on the 77 K
coldfinger, whereby methanol was introduced between the exit
of the pyrolysis oven and the coldfinger. Further details of
the FVT apparatus have been published.35
Con clu sion
Matrix isolation was carried out using 10 cm long, 0.8 cm
internal diameter quartz tubes in an oven directly attached
to the vacuum shroud of a Leybold-Heraeus closed cycle liquid
He cryostat.3b,35 Ar was used as matrix host, which was passed
over the sample while it was subliming and cocondensed at
ca. 12 K on a BaF2 window for IR spectroscopy. Neat isolation
at 77 K was carried out in a similar apparatus using a liquid
N2 cryostat.35
The allenic esters 4a and 4b undergo a retro-ene
reaction on FVT above 800 °C to give unsubstituted
vinylketene (6) together with formaldehyde (5a ) or ac-
etaldehyde (5b).
The thermolysis of N,N-dimethylallenecarboxamide
(4c) likewise gives vinylketene 6 and N-methylmethyl-
eneimine (5c), starting at lower FVT temperatures (>500
°C).
The FVT-MS combination has been described.36
Ma ter ia ls. 3-Methoxycyclobutenone,37 3-ethoxycyclobuten-
one,12 3-(N,N-dimethylamino)cyclobutenone,3a 4a ,b,38 and 4c3a
were synthesized according to the literature. IR matrix
isolation data for these compounds have been described.3a 10
was obtained commercially (Aldrich).
These observations are in very good agreement with
ab initio calculations which predict activation energies
for the retro-ene reaction of 181 (R ) OMe) or 167 (R )
NMe2) kJ mol-1
.
(2E)-Bu ten oic a cid (10): IR (Ar matrix, 12 K): 3585 (w),
3579 (w), 3570 (sh), 3567 (m), 3562 (w), 3551 (w), 2992 (w),
2963 (w), 2953 (w), 2924 (w), 1755 (s), 1738 (m), 1729 (m), 1710
(m), 1707 (w), 1664 (m), 1449 (m), 1436 (w), 1379 (w), 1366
(w), 1360 (w), 1356 (w), 1346 (w), 1320 (b), 1298 (b), 1294 (w),
1273 (b), 1229 (w), 1201 (w), 1181 (b), 1164 (m), 1160 (w), 1144
(m), 1102 (w), 1093 (m), 1090 (m), 979 (w), 973 (w), 963 (w),
852 (w), 869 (w), 866 (w), 849 (w), 846 (w), 842 (w), 840 (w)
The same acylallenes 4 are formed on FVT of cy-
clobutenones 7 via vinylketenes 3.3 At higher FVT
temperatures, the retro-ene reactions again lead to the
formation of 6.
In the case of the 2-cyclohexylidene-N,N-diethylethen-
ecarboxamide (11), Ar matrix isolation indicates the
formation of the vinylketene 12, formed by a 1,3-NEt2
shift, but the vinylketene 13 expected from the retro-ene
reaction is not directly observable. Instead, formation
of a conjugated aldehyde 16 occurs by a 1,5-H shift in
13. Ab initio calculations carried out on 4-methylvi-
nylketene 18 confirm that the 1,5-H shift has a much
lower activation barrier (ca. 125 kJ mol-1) than the retro-
ene reaction.
cm-1
.
1,3,5-Tr im eth yl-1,3,5-tr ia zin e (9). 9 was synthesized
1
according to Graymore.14a Yield 30-50%; bp 160-172 °C. H
NMR (60 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.30 (s, 9 H), 3.21 (s, 6 H); IR (neat,
-196 °C): 2966 (s), 2942 (s), 2892 (m), 2843 (w), 2809 (sh),
2787 (s), 2773 (sh), 2726 (m), 2664 (m), 2649 (m), 2630 (w),
2596 (m), 2572 (w), 2503 (w), 2453 (w), 1471 (s), 1444 (s), 1428
(s), 1386 (m), 1373 (m), 1346 (w), 1305 (w), 1273 (sh), 1262
(s), 1234 (m), 1156 (m), 1116 (s), 1050 (w), 1025 (m), 1003 (m),
981 (w), 915 (s), 898 (w), 860 (m), 836 (w), 627 (w) cm-1; (Ar,
12 K): 2981 (m), 2952 (m), 2901 (w), 2847 (w), 2815 (w), 2793
(m), 2730 (w), 2670 (w), 2636 (w), 2605 (w), 2576 (w), 1475
(m), 1446 (m), 1430 (w), 1425 (w), 1387 (m), 1375 (m), 1277
(m), 1266 (m), 1237 (m), 1163 (m), 1126 (m), 1119 (s), 1052
Exp er im en ta l a n d Com p u ta tion a l Section
Com p u ta tion a l Meth od s. Standard ab initio molecular
orbital calculations31 were carried out using the GAUSSIAN
94 system of programs.32 The structures and energies of all
model compounds were examined at the G2(MP2,SVP) level
of theory.33 This corresponds effectively to QCISD(T)/6-
311+G(3df,2p)//MP2/6-31G* energies together with zero-point
vibrational and isogyric corrections. In the G2(MP2,SVP)
theory, the basis-set extension energy contribution is calcu-
lated at the MP2 level, and the QCISD(T) energy is evaluated
using the 6-31G* basis set. It has been shown that the
accuracy of the G2(MP2, SVP) method is comparable to that
(w), 1005 (m), 917 (m), 915 (m), 862 (w), 629 (w), 496 cm-1
.
Ma tr ix Isola tion of N-Meth ylm eth a n im in e (5c). The
preparation of a matrix of 5c was slightly different from the
one described by Stolkin and Gu¨nthard.13 Instead of using a
low FVT temperature and an alumina-silica catalyst (90:10),
9 was detrimerized by FVT at 850 °C. The data for 5c are as
follows: IR (neat, 12 K): 3013 (m), 2943 (s), 2896 (s), 2850
(s), 2776 (m), 1653 (s), 1473 (s), 1437 (m), 1405 (w), 1384 (w),
1262 (w), 1232 (m), 1160 (w), 1112 (m), 1046 (m), 1002 (w),
949 (m), 917 (w), 861 (w), 630 (vw), 498 (w) cm-1; IR (Ar, 12
K): 3014 (m), 2964 (m), 2955 (m), 2940 (m), 2902 (m), 2886
(31) Hehre, W. J .; Radom, L.; Schleyer, P. v. R.; Pople, J . A. Ab Initio
Molecular Orbital Theory; Wiley: New York, 1986.
(32) Frisch, M. J .; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Gill, P. M. W.;
J ohnson, B. G.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J . R.; Keith, T. A.; Petersson,
G. A.; Montgomery, J . A.; Raghavachari, K.; Al-Laham, M. A.;
Zakrzewski, V. G.; Ortiz, J . V.; Foresman, J . B.; Cioslowski, J .;
Stefanov, B. B.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Peng, C. Y.; Ayala,
P. Y.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J . L.; Replogle, E. S.; Gomperts,
R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J .; Binkley, J . S.; DeFrees, D. J .; Baker, J .;
Stewart, J . J . P.; Head-Gordon, M.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J . A. Gaussian
94; Gaussian Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1995.
(34) Curtiss, L. A.; Raghavachari, K.; Pople, J . A. J . Chem. Phys.
1993, 98, 1293.
(35) Wentrup, C.; Blanch, R.; Briehl, H.; Gross, G. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1988, 110, 1874.
(36) Wentrup, C.; Kambouris, P.; Evans, R. A.; Owen, D.; Macfar-
lane, G.; Chuche, J .; Pommelet, J . C.; Ben Cheikh, A.; Plisnier, M.;
Flammang, R. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 3130.
(37) Stone, G. B.; Liebeskind, L. S. J . Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 4614.
(38) Hamlet, Z.; Barker, W. D. Synthesis 1970, 543.
(39) Pimentel, G. C.; Charles, S. W. Pure Appl. Chem. 1963, 7, 111.
(33) (a) Smith, B. J .; Radom, L. J . Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 6468. (b)
Curtiss, L. A.; Redfern, P. C.; Smith, B. J .; Radom, L. Chem. Phys.
1996, 104, 5148.