Restructuring α-pinene: Novel entry into diverse polycarbocyclic frameworks

Article abstract of DOI:10.1016/S0040-4039(01)01668-9

(-)-α-Pinene 1 has been restructured into a chiral cyclohexenone (+)-6, in which the functionalities were integrated to afford bicyclo[3.3.1]nonan 3,7-diones and a novel tricyclic skeleton 16 related to the sesquiterpene clovene. Intramolecular [2+2] photocycloadditions in (+)-6 and related 5-alkenylcyclohexenones provided an entry into some novel bridged tricyclic systems.

Full text of DOI:10.1016/S0040-4039(01)01668-9

TETRAHEDRON
LETTERS
Pergamon
Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 7667–7670
Restructuring a-pinene: novel entry into diverse polycarbocyclic
frameworks
Goverdhan Mehta* and Jayakrishnan Nandakumar
Department of Organic Chemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, India
Received 28 July 2001; revised 27 August 2001; accepted 5 September 2001
Abstract—(−)-a-Pinene 1 has been restructured into a chiral cyclohexenone (+)-6, in which the functionalities were integrated to
afford bicyclo[3.3.1]nonan 3,7-diones and a novel tricyclic skeleton 16 related to the sesquiterpene clovene. Intramolecular [2+2]
photocycloadditions in (+)-6 and related 5-alkenylcyclohexenones provided an entry into some novel bridged tricyclic systems.
© 2001 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
(−)-a-Pinene 1, a monoterpene found abundantly in
Nature has been extensively explored as a chiron in
diverse natural product synthesis.1 In many such
endeavours, (+)-campholenic aldehyde 2 obtained from
(−)-1 through epoxidation and Lewis acid mediated
fragmentation2 has proved to be a valuable synthon.3
However, the built-in chirality and functionalities in
(+)-2 offer many new possibilities for elaboration into
diverse polycyclic frameworks, particularly those of
relevance in natural products syntheses. Herein, we
report the acquisition of several new carbocyclic frame-
works from (+)-2 through short, simple synthetic
manoeuvres.
To begin with, expansion of the five-membered ring in
(+)-2 and homologation of the side arm appeared to be
a useful transformation as the resultant cyclohexenone
(+)-6 would be a more versatile building-block for
further elaboration. Consequently, (+)-campholenic
aldehyde 2,2 was subjected to OsO4 mediated dihydroxy-
lation to exclusively furnish one diastereomer of the
diol (+)-3. Wittig olefination in (+)-3 furnished quanti-
tatively the diol–olefin (+)-4. The diol moiety in (+)-4
was cleaved with periodate and the resulting 1,5-dicar-
bonyl compound 5 on intramolecular aldol cyclisation
in the presence of pTSA afforded enone (+)-64 (Scheme
1).
O
O
a
HO
HO
(-)-1
(+)-2
(+)-3
b
O
c
d
HO
HO
O
O
(+)-4
(+)-6
5
t
t
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (a) OsO4, NMMO, BuOH–H2O–acetone (5:2:5), rt, 3 days, 82%; (b) PPh3MeBr, BuOK,
THF, 30 min, quant.; (c) NaIO4, CH2Cl2–H2O (10:1), 6 h; (d) pTSA, cyclohexane, 80°C, 2 h, 68% for two steps.
* Corresponding author.
0040-4039/01/$ - see front matter © 2001 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
PII: S0040-4039(01)01668-9

7668
G. Mehta, J. Nandakumar / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 7667–7670
From (+)-6, we set out to explore entry into the bicy-
clo[3.3.1]nonane system, which is present among many
natural products and synthetic access to this ring sys-
tem is rather limited.5 In our approach, we decided to
synchronise the available functionalities in (+)-6 for an
intramolecular Michael cyclisation to deliver the bicy-
clo[3.3.1]nonane system laced with functionalities.
Thus, (+)-6 was subjected to Wacker–Tsuji oxidation6
to generate the methyl ketone (+)-7 with a Michael
donor site. On exposure to base, (+)-7 successfully
underwent the projected cyclisation to afford (−)-84 in
enantiomerically pure form in 76% yield in a short
sequence from (+)-2 (Scheme 2).
diones with additional substituents was explored. Addi-
tion of methyl lithium to (+)-6 yielded the tertiary
allylic alcohol (+)-9 in good yield. Oxidation of (+)-9
with PCC led to the transposed enone (−)-10. Wacker–
Tsuji oxidation6 in (−)-10 afforded the enone (+)-11.
The Michael acceptor centre in this substrate is steri-
cally quite hindered due to the presence of the gem-
dimethyl group, but on exposure to base it underwent
smooth intramolecular Michael addition to yield 124 as
the exclusive product in 80% yield. The presence of
1
symmetry in 12 revealed through its H and 13C NMR
(8 resonances for 12 carbons) spectra facilitated its
characterisation (Scheme 2).
Another variant of the intramolecular Michael addition
from (+)-6 to deliver the bicyclo[3.3.1]nonane-3,7-
Our next objective was to elaborate the above-men-
tioned strategy to some more complex natural product
O
O
a
b
(+)-6
O
O
O
O
(-)-8
(+)-7
c
HO
d
e
f
O
O
O
O
O
12
(+)-9
(-)-10
(+)-11
t
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) PdCl2, CuCl, O2, DMF–H2O (3:1), rt, 2 h, 90%; (b) BuOK, THF–tBuOH (1:1), 1 h, 76%;
t
(c) MeLi, THF, 10°C, 1 h, 90%; (d) PCC, CH2Cl2, 6 h, 95%; (e) PdCl2, CuCl, O2, DMF–H2O (3:1), rt, 2 h, 92%; (f) BuOK,
THF–tBuOH (1:1), 1 h, 80%.
O
HO
b
c
a
6
O
O
O
(+)-13
(-)-14
(+)-15
d
O
O
O
O
O
HO
H
O
O
B
16
Scheme 3. Reagents and conditions: (a) n-butenyl bromide, Li, THF, sonication, 20°C, 75%; (b) PCC, CH2Cl2, 6 h, 93%; (c) PdCl2,
t
CuCl, O2, DMF–H2O (3:1), rt, 2 h, 86%; (d) BuOK, THF–tBuOH (1:1), 1 h, 54%.

G. Mehta, J. Nandakumar / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 7667–7670
7669
carbocyclic skeleta possessing the bicyclo[3.3.1]nonane
motif. Towards this end, (+)-6 was subjected to Barbier
reaction with butenyl bromide to afford (+)-13 (Scheme
3). PCC oxidation of (+)-13 readily furnished the trans-
posed enone (−)-14. The two terminal olefin bearing
side arms of (−)-14 were subjected to double Wacker–
Tsuji oxidation6 to afford the diketo-enone (+)-15. The
plan was to affect tandem Michael addition–aldol cycli-
sation in a one-pot reaction in (+)-15 to furnish a
tricyclic system directly. In the event, on exposure to
base (+)-15 yielded exclusively the anticipated, doubly
cyclised product 16.4 The tricyclic C15-keto-enone 16 is
an unnatural sesquiterpenoid having the carbocyclic
skeleton present in the sesquiterpene clovene7 except
that the disposition of the methyl groups on the carbo-
cyclic framework is different (Scheme 3).
strict generalisation can be made for such reactions.10
The 1,6 intramolecular photoaddition is perhaps steri-
cally more favourable in this case than its 1,5 counter-
part leading to such selectivity (Scheme 4).
The 5-alkenyl cyclohexenone (−)-14 has an additional
reaction centre in the form of a butenyl moiety, and
therefore the interest in its photoreactivity was two-
fold. First was to explore if any regioselectivity could
be observed between the two terminal double bonds
during the [2+2]-cycloaddition, and second, whether the
‘rule of five’ holds true in this case or not. On irradia-
tion, (−)-14 gave rise to a mixture of products from
which two major tricyclic products (+)-194 (45%) and
(+)-204 (15%) were separated and characterised. The
structural assignments to (+)-19 and (+)-20 were
1
secured on the basis of H–1H COSY data for both of
At this stage, attention was turned towards the photo-
chemical reactions of the a-pinene derived cyclo-
hexenones described above as they offered some
interesting possibilities. The intramolecular [2+2] photo-
cycloadditions between enone and olefin moieties have
been extensively studied in 2-, 3- and 4- substituted
alkenyl cyclohexenones and found numerous applica-
tions in synthesis.8 However, photochemistry of 5-
alkenyl cyclohexenones has been sparsely investigated
possibly due to their difficult accessibility. Hence, the
readily available 5-allyl cyclohexanones (+)-6 and (−)-
14 attracted our attention and their response to photo-
irradiation was investigated. When cyclohexenone (+)-6
was irradiated with a 125W UV lamp, a single tricyclic
product 174 was obtained in 70% yield. The 13C NMR
spectrum of 17 had 8 lines indicating symmetry. The
presence of a plane of symmetry in the 1,6 addition
product (which is absent in the 1,5 addition product 18)
led to the structure 17. This mode of addition observed
here is against the ‘rule of five ’ for intramolecular [2+2]
photocycloadditions9 and points to the fact that no
these compounds. In (+)-19 and (+)-20 the allyl arm
had added on to the enone double bond, leaving the
butenyl part intact. The major product (+)-19 (45%)
originated through [2+2]-cycloaddition according to the
‘rule of five’, whereas the relatively less abundant
product (+)-20 (15%) was a consequence of 1,6 addition
(Scheme 5).
In summary, we have restructured the monoterpene
a-pinene (−)-1 to a six-membered enone (+)-6 embel-
lished with functionalities as well as chirality via the
intermediacy of a-campholenic aldehyde (+)-2. Enone
(+)-6 was utilised to construct the bicyclo[3.3.1]nonane
framework and the methodology has been extended
towards the rapid construction of the tricyclic skeleton
present in the sesquiterpene clovene employing
intramolecular, Michael addition and aldol cyclisation
in tandem. Photochemistry of 5-alkenyl cyclohexenones
(+)-6 and (−)-14 has provided a facile entry to several
new tricyclic skeleta in chiral form through intramolec-
ular [2+2]-cycloadditions.
O
O
a
1, 6 cyclisation
1, 5 cyclisation
O
(+)-6
17
18
O
Scheme 4. Reagents and conditions: (a) hw (125 W Hg vap. lamp, Pyrex filter), C6H6, 3 h, (70%).
a
+
O
O
(+)-20 O
1,6-cyclisation
(-)-14
(+)-19
1,5-cyclisation
Scheme 5. Reagents and conditions: (a) hw (125 W Hg vap. lamp, Pyrex filter), C6H6, 3 h, (+)-19 (45%), (+)-20 (15%).

7670
G. Mehta, J. Nandakumar / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 7667–7670
Acknowledgements
31.5, 24.2, 22.7, 16.6; Mass (E.I., 70 eV): m/z 233 (M++1).
1
17: IR (neat): 1709, cm−1; H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3):
We would like to thank SIF, at the Indian Institute of
Science for high field NMR data.
l 2.69 (1H, t, J=5.1 Hz), 2.57 (2H, q, J=5.4 Hz),
2.42-2.35 (1H, m), 2.20–2.14 (2H, m), 1.97 (1H, br. s),
1.82 (2H, dd, J=13.7, 4.0 Hz), 1.33 (1H, d, J=8.7 Hz),
1.12 (6H, s); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): l 219.1, 47.0,
44.9, 40.2, 40.0, 35.6 (2×C), 30.2 (2×C), 23.4 (2×C); Mass
(E.I., 70 eV): m/z 164 (M++1). 19: [h]D: +45.4 (c=1.08,
CHCl3); IR (neat): 1702, 1641 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz,
CDCl3): l 5.88–5.82 (1H, m), 5.01 (1H, dd, J=17.0, 1.5
Hz), 4.97 (1H, d, J=10.0 Hz), 2.69–2.63 (2H, m), 2.51–
2.40 (4H, m), 2.30–2.20 (1H, m), 2.19–2.09 (1H, m), 2.03
(1H, t, J=6.0 Hz), 1.63–1.54 (2H, m), 1.51 (1H, d,
J=13.0 Hz), 1.39 (1H, d, J=11.5 Hz), 0.87 (3H, s), 0.84
(3H, s); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): l 215.8, 139.0,
114.5, 54.8, 50.5, 46.5, 45.1, 43.3, 39.6, 38.9, 31.1, 29.7,
27.1, 23.3, 18.5. 20: [h]D: +9.6 (c=0.52, CHCl3); IR
References
1. Some recent examples: (a) Wender, P. A.; Badham, N. F.;
Conway, S. P.; Floreancig, P. E.; Glass, T. E.; Houze, J.
B.; Krauss, N. E.; Lee, D.; Marquess, D. G.; McGrane,
P. L.; Meng, W.; Natchus, M. G.; Shuker, A. J.; Sutton,
J. C.; and Taylor, R. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
2757; (b) Steel, P. G.; Thomas, E. J. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1997, 4, 371; (c) Menager, E.; Merifield,
E.; Smallridge, M.; Thomas, E. J. Tetrahedron 1997, 53,
9377; (d) Wolk, J. L.; Goldsmidt, Z.; Dunkelblum, E.
Synthesis 1986, 347.
1
(neat): 1707, 1641 cm−1; H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): l
2. (a) Arbusow, B. Ber. 1935, 68, 1430; (b) Lewis, J. B.;
Hedrick, G. W. J. Org. Chem. 1965, 30, 4271; (c) Cha-
puis, C.; Brauchli, R. Helv. Chim. Acta 1992, 75, 1527;
(d) Vialemaringe de, M.; Bourgeois, M.-J.; Campagnole,
M.; Mantaudon, E. Helv. Chim. Acta 2000, 83, 616.
3. (a) Pamingle, H.; Snowden, R. L.; Schulte Elte, K. H.
Helv. Chim. Acta 1991, 74, 543; (b) Liu, H.; Chan, W. H.
Can. J. Chem. 1982, 60, 1081.
5.84–5.76 (1H, m), 5.03 (1H, dd, J=17.0, 1.5 Hz), 4.96
(1H, d, J=10.0 Hz), 2.63–2.59 (1H, m), 2.55 (1H, d,
J=5.5 Hz), 2.48 (1H, q, J=6.0 Hz), 2.27–2.23 (1H, m),
2.05–2.02 (2H, m), 1.98–1.93 (3H, series of m), 1.73–1.69
(2H, m), 1.56–1.50 (1H, m), 1.37–1.31 (1H, m), 1.13 (3H,
s), 0.89 (3H, s); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): l 215.1,
138.8, 114.4, 54.0, 53.4, 43.8, 40.7, 37.6, 34.9, 33.8, 32.7,
30.9, 29.7, 24.6, 23.7.
4. All new compounds reported here were duly character-
ised on the basis of spectral (IR, 1H (2D wherever
required) and 13C NMR) and LRMS data. Selected spec-
tral data: 6: [h]D: +19.0 (c=1.0, CHCl3); IR (neat): 1676
5. (a) Faulkner, J. D.; Shumsky, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 1989,
54, 2511; (b) Iwabuchi, H.; Yoshikura, M.; Kamisako,
W. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1988, 36, 2447–2451; (c) Dic-
tionary of natural products; Chapman and Hill Database
A-C., 1069–70.
1
cm−1; H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): l 6.86–6.80 (1H, m),
5.96 (1H, d, J=9 Hz), 5.80–5.66 (1H, m), 5.08–5.03 (2H,
m), 2.51–2.31 (2H, m), 2.15–2.06 (1H, m), 1.97–1.83 (2H,
m), 1.19 (3H, s), 1.01 (3H, s); 13C NMR (75 MHz,
CDCl3): l 204.6, 147.4, 136.9, 128.1, 116.6, 45.3, 43.2,
34.0, 28.4, 22.5, 19.0; Mass (E.I., 70 eV): m/z 165 (M++1).
8: [h]D: −80.7 (c=1.76, CHCl3); mp: 86–88°C; IR (thin
6. Tsuji, J. Synthesis 1984, 389.
7. (a) Doyle, P.; McLean, I. R.; Parker, W.; Raphael, R. A.;
Murray, R. D. H. J. Chem. Soc. 1965, 1344; (b) Schulz,
A. G.; Dittami, J. P. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 2318; (c)
Ackroyd, J.; Karpf, M.; Dreiding, A. S. Helv. Chim. Acta
1984, 67, 1963.
1
film): 1701 cm−1; H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): l 2.89–
8. Reviews on intramolecular [2+2] photocycloadditions: (a)
Crimmins, M. T. Chem. Rev. 1988, 88, 1453; (b) Crim-
mins, M. T. Comprehensive Organic Synthesis; 1991, Vol.
5, p. 123. Selected examples of intramolecular [2+2] pho-
tocycloadditions in alkenyl cyclohexenones: (c) Becker,
D.; Haddad, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 6393; (d)
Pirrung, M. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 7130; (e)
Pirrung, M. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 82; (f)
Cargill, R. L.; Dalton, J. R.; O’Connor, S.; Michels, D.
G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1978, 4465; (g) Croft, K. D.;
Ghilsalberti, E. L.; Jeffries, P. R.; Stuart, A. D.; Raston,
C. L.; White, A. R. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1981,
1473; (h) Mehta, G.; Acharyulu, P. V. R. J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1994, 2759.
2.81 (2H, m), 2.71–2.52 (3H, series of m), 2.46–2.24 (4H,
series of m), 2.09–2.02 (1H, m), 1.28 (3H, s), 1.09 (3H, s);
13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): l 213.5, 208.1, 48.5, 48.1,
45.1, 44.35, 44.32, 33.7 29.2, 27.7, 22.4; Mass (E.I., 70
eV): m/z 180 (M+). 12: mp: 244–246°C; IR (thin film):
1
1711 cm−1; H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): l 2.81 (2H, dd,
J=16.2, 6.3 Hz), 2.55 (2H, d, J=16.2 Hz), 2.30–2.10
(3H, m), 2.13 (2H, d, J=16.2 Hz), 1.32 (6H, s), 1.00 (3H,
s); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): l 208.8 (2×C), 51.9
(2×C), 45.3 (2×C), 43.6, 41.2, 35.4, 24.3, 22.8 (2×C); Mass
(E.I., 70 eV): m/z 194 (M+). 16: mp: 90–92°C; IR (thin
film): 1710, 1673, 1612 cm−1 1H NMR (300 MHz,
;
CDCl3): l 2.89 (1H, dd, J=14.1, 6.2 Hz), 2.78–2.64 (2H,
series of m), 2.56–2.46 (1H, m), 2.33–2.20 (5H, m), 2.10
(3H, s), 2.06–1.96 (1H, m), 1.54–1.48 (1H, m), 1.31 (3H,
s), 1.10 (3H, s); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): l 209.6,
197.3, 155.7, 136.2, 57.4, 49.7, 46.2, 44.3, 43.5, 36.5, 35.6,
9. (a) Srinivasan, R.; Carlough, K. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1967, 89, 4932; (b) Liu, R. S. H.; Hammond, G. S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 4936.
10. Wolff, S.; Agosta, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 1292.