O. Blacque et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 634 (2001) 47–54
53
4.7. X-ray structure solution
two positions rotated by 21.5°. The geometrical centers
,
of C6–C10 and C6*–C10* exhibit a slippage of 0.17 A.
4.7.1. [Cp*Nb(ꢀO)(SC(O)NHPh)] (3)
Both cycles were constrained to perfect pentagonal
rings and refined with isotropic thermal parameters and
a multiplicity of 0.5. Other non-hydrogen atoms in this
structure were refined with anisotropic parameters. All
non-hydrogen atoms in the structure of 5 were refined
with anisotropic thermal parameters. All hydrogen
atoms (except the hydride in 5) in both structures were
included in calculated positions and refined in a riding
model with isotropic displacement coefficients. The nio-
bium hydride in 5 was located in a difference Fourier
map and freely refined with an isotropic temperature
factor.
2
The compound crystallized in thin yellow needles
with a size just suitable for X-ray structure analysis on
a STOE IPDS diffractometer. For a few crystals the
data for at least 180° in 8 were collected. The inspec-
tion of the reflections in reciprocal space (program part
RECIPE of STOE-IPDS software [18]) revealed, that all
crystals were twinned following the same law. The
crystals belong to the monoclinic crystal system and the
twin law is a twofold axis in [100] direction. The matrix
to transform one cell into the other is (1 0 0, 0 −1 0,
−0.8387 0 −1), the reciprocal lattices coincide almost
exactly when ꢀhꢀ=0 or 6 (a similar example is given in
Ref. [19]).
Further details for the structure refinements of com-
plexes 3–5 are listed in Table 2.
It was possible to solve the main part of the structure
from a data set of only one twin component. But
reliable results of a refinement in this case could only be
5. Supplementary material
obtained with the SHELXL97 program [20] and a HKLF
5
instruction thus including all available data and mark-
ing the reflections belonging to one of the two compo-
nents or to both. All reflections with undisturbed
intensities were collected by an integration in TWIN
modus of the STOE-IPDS software [18] with the two
orientation matrices for both components. From a sub-
sequent normal integration with only one orientation
matrix we extracted all reflections with intensity contri-
butions from both components. A modified program
from Ruck [21] looked with the known transformation
matrix for reflections with almost perfect coincidence,
added the corresponding F2(hkl)-values of the second
component and marked all these reflections to be used
with SHELXL97 and HKLF 5. All partially overlapped
reflections were discarded because the intensity of such
reflections could not be determined correctly.
Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors)
for the structural analyses have been deposited with the
Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, CCDC nos.
161795 (3), 161796 (5), 161797 (4). Copies of the data
can be obtained free of charge from The Director,
CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK
(Fax: +44-1223-336033; e-mail: deposit@ccdccam.
ac.uk; deposit@chemcrys. cam.ac.uk; www: http://
www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk).
Acknowledgements
Parts of this work have been supported by the
Deutscher Akademischer Auslandsdienst (DAAD) and
the Ministe`re des Affaires Etrange`res (Procope
Program).
With this new data set, it was possible to locate the
remaining atoms from difference Fourier syntheses and
to refine the structure to absolutely reliable final
parameters. The refined fractional contribution of twin
component two was 0.3048.
References
[1] R.S. Pilato, C.E. Housmekeridis, P. Jernakoff, D. Rubin, G.L.
Geoffroy, A.L. Rheingold, Organometallics 9 (1990) 2333.
[2] R.H. Holm, Chem. Rev. 87 (1987) 1401.
[3] M.J. Carney, P.J. Walsh, F.J. Hollander, R.G. Bergman, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 111 (1989) 8751.
4.7.2. [Cp*Nb(ꢀO){OC(O)NHPh}] (4) and
2
[Cp*NbH{OC(O)NPh}] (5)
2
A pale yellow crystal of 4 and an orange one of 5
were mounted on a Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer
[4] (a) W.A. Herrmann, R. Serrano, U. Ku¨sthardt, M.L. Ziegler, E.
Guggolz, T. Zahn, Angew. Chem. 96 (1984) 498;
(b) W.A. Herrmann, R. Serrano, U. Ku¨sthardt, M.L. Ziegler, E.
Guggolz, T. Zahn, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 23 (1984) 515.
[5] U. Ku¨sthardt, W.A. Herrmann, M.L. Ziegler, T. Zahn, B.
Nuber, J. Organomet. Chem. 311 (1986) 163.
[6] H. Brunner, J.-C. Leblanc, D. Lucas, W. Meier, C. Moise, Y.
Mugnier, B. Nuber, S. Rigny, A. Sadorge, J. Wachter, J.
Organomet. Chem. 566 (1998) 203.
[7] D. Braga, F. Grepioni, G.R. Desiraju, J. Organomet. Chem. 548
(1997) 33.
[8] R.J. Balahura, G. Ferguson, L. Ecott, P.Y. Siew, J. Chem. Soc.
Dalton Trans. (1982) 747.
,
using Mo–Ka radiation (u=0.71073 A). A total of
52664 (4) and 35711 (5) reflections were indexed, inte-
grated and corrected for Lorentz and polarization ef-
fects using DENZO-SMN and SCALEPACK [22]. Data
reduction yielded 6208 (4) and 6348 (5) unique reflec-
tions of which 2349 (4) and 2296 (5) had I\2|(I). The
structures were solved by Patterson syntheses and sub-
sequent difference Fourier maps and refined by full-ma-
trix least squares on F2 using SHELXL [23]. In the case
of 4 one of the C5Me5 rings is disordered and occupies