Organic Letters
Letter
related cyclopentane-derived substrates 1j and 1k was much
different, as 1j was converted to 6k in 79% yield, but the
coupling of 1k with diethyl malonate afforded 6l in only 21%
yield. The difference in the reactivity of 1j and 1k is likely due
to a Thorpe-type effect,8 but the difference in reactivity of
cyclohexene substrate 1h and cyclopentane substrate 1k is
presumably a result of ring strain in the transition state for the
formation of bicyclo[3.3.0]octane product 6l.
Scheme 5. Proposed Mechanism
We also briefly examined the reactivity of acyclic alkenyl
triflate substrate 7. As shown in eq 4, this transformation
afforded spirocyclic compound 8 in 82% yield with >20:1 dr.
However, preliminary efforts to employ other acyclic alkenyl
triflates led to complex mixtures of products; future efforts will
be directed toward improving the desired reactivity of these
substrates.
carbopalladation of the alkene through chairlike conformation
11. The resulting intermediate 12 then affords the product 6
via reductive elimination, which also regenerates the active
Pd(0) catalyst. The stereochemical outcome of these reactions
is consistent with prior models involving minimization of
nonbonding interactions in chairlike transition states similar to
11.2,3
In conclusion, we have developed a new Pd-catalyzed alkene
difunctionalization reaction between malonate nucleophiles
and alkenes bearing tethered alkenyl or aryl triflate electro-
philes. The transformations generate two carbon−carbon
bonds and provide products that contain up to three
stereocenters with good to excellent diastereoselectivity. We
have also demonstrated that use of smaller phosphine ligands
allows for transformations of substrates bearing 1,2-disub-
stituted alkenes. Future studies will be directed toward
expanding the scope of these transformations to other types
of carbanion nucleophiles.
Although we have focused the bulk of our preliminary
studies on reactions of diethyl malonate as a nucleophile, other
activated methylene nucleophiles can be employed in these
transformations. As shown in Scheme 4, the coupling of 1a
Scheme 4. Reactions of Other Activated Methylene
Nucleophiles
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
■
S
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the
Experimental procedures, characterization data, copies of
1H and 13C NMR spectra for all new compounds (PDF)
AUTHOR INFORMATION
■
Corresponding Author
ORCID
with ethyl acetoacetate proceeded under standard conditions
to afford 9a in 83% yield as a 1:1 mixture of diastereomers
epimeric at the stereocenter adjacent to the carbonyl groups
(Scheme 4, eq 5). Use of triethyl phosphonoacetate provided
9b in 55% yield and 1:1 dr,9 although use of LiHMDS as base
was needed to obtain optimal results (Scheme 4, eq 6). The
reactivity of ethyl cyanoacetate proved to be more challenging,
but after some optimization we found that use of (BrettPhos)-
Pd(allyl)(Cl) as the precatalyst,10 combined with Cs2CO3 as
base and dioxane as solvent, provided 9c in 50% yield (Scheme
4, eq 7). Although the coupling reactions of 1a with other
malonate derivatives provided moderate amounts of the
desired products, efforts to combine internal alkene substrates
(e.g., 1g) with these nucleophiles were unsuccessful.
Author Contributions
†These authors made equal contributions to this work.
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
The authors thank the NIH-NIGMS (GM 124030) for
financial support of this work. E.M.H. was partially supported
by a University of Michigan Rackham dissertation fellowship.
REFERENCES
■
The mechanism of these reactions is likely similar to that of
related transformations of amine or alcohol nucleophiles.2b,3 As
shown in Scheme 5, oxidative addition of the alkenyl (or aryl)
triflate to Pd(0) generates intermediate 10, which then
undergoes coordination of the alkene to Pd followed by anti-
(1) For a review, see: (a) Dhungana, R. K.; KC, S.; Basnet, P.; Giri,
R. Chem. Rec. 2018, 18, 1314. For selected recent examples, see:
(b) KC, S.; Basnet, P.; Thapa, S.; Shrestha, B.; Giri, R. J. Org. Chem.
2018, 83, 2920. (c) Kuang, Y.; Wang, X.; Anthony, D.; Diao, T. Chem.
Commun. 2018, 54, 2558. (d) Wang, K.; Ding, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Kong, W.
C
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX