Both features (the in situ elimination and the N-methylation)
advanced the cyclization product along the route toward 3,
and neither over-reduction nor dehydration interfered to any
great extent.
Acetonide 11 was converted to its anomeric acetate 12
(72%, 4:1 mixture of C-1 isomers) by careful treatment with
acetic anhydride and methanesulfonic acid (other acids, such
as sulfuric or trifluoroacetic, were ineffective). Under these
conditions, the hydroxyls at C-2 and C-5 were also acety-
lated, and the O-TBS group at C-3 was cleaved and the
hydroxyl there acetylated as well. The resulting tetra-O-
acetate 12 superficially resembles a wide variety of other
anomeric acetates previously used for nucleoside (even
“complex” nucleoside5) synthesis.16 However, application of
the standard conditions [bis(trimethylsilyl)uracil, TMS-OTf,
refluxing acetonitrile, or 1,2-dichloroethane] to 12 gave no
nucleoside product whatsoever. The problem was determined
to be the nucleophilic N-4 (in box), which is positioned just
six atoms away from the anomeric center. Lewis basic atoms
have previously been observed to interfere with O- and
N-glycosylations,17 and the usual solution is to use an excess
of the glycosyl donor to temporarily block the more Lewis
basic site. As this is not an option here, the N-4 amino was
instead pretreated with each of several different acids,
including SnCl4, methanesulfonic acid, BF3, and HCl. Only
as the hydrochloride salt did 12 provide any of the corre-
sponding uracil nucleoside 13 (one isomer, 18%). The
structure of 13 follows from the nearly first order 1H NMR
spectrum and its spectroscopic resemblance to similar
compounds.3,9 Deprotection with 0.5 N LiOH in ethanol
solution and then purification by reverse-phase HPLC
afforded the nucleoside triol acid 3 (64%).
For the synthesis of the 6′S diastereomer 4 (Figure 3), the
C-5 carboxaldehyde derived from 5 as above was chain
extended with the Still-Gennari reagent10,18 to provide the
cis unsaturated ester 14 (60%). The ester was reduced with
DIBAL as before (55%), and the resulting primary alcohol
was subjected to Sharpless epoxidation. Although some of
the desired 5S,6S epoxy acid 15 was obtained in the presence
of (+)-diethyl L-tartrate, the reaction was slow and did not
proceed to completion. A more satisfactory solution was to
epoxidize with m-chloroperoxybenzoic acid (CH2Cl2, 15 h),
which led to the same diastereomer (67%). Oxidation as
before gave the 5S,6R epoxy acid 16 (92%); however, the
reaction of 16 with sodium azide was nonselective, giving
rise to a 3:2 mixture of azido acids (78%). That the major
product is the desired 5S,6S isomer 17 was established by
subsequent transformations. The mixture of azido acids was
coupled with amine 9 as before, leading to a mixture of two
peptide isomers 18 (48%, theoretical 60%) with the same
configuration at C-5′ and C-6′ (matching the major azido
acid isomer) but differing in the C-2′′′ and C-3′′′ (liposido-
mycin numbering) configurations. The minor azido acid
evidently did not couple. Cyclization of 18 to the diaz-
epanone 19 was carried out as follows. A solution in CH2-
Figure 3.
Cl2 was treated with ozone, concentrated, and then catalyti-
cally hydrogenated (10% Pd-C) in ethanol solution in the
presence of HCl. The intermediate amino ozonide (m/z 685)
was reduced with sodium triacetoxyborohydride as for 11
to give a 3:1 mixture of two diazepanone isomers (19,
8-21%) as the only cyclization products isolated. Neither
elimination nor N-methylation occurred in this case, and the
diazepanone ring stereochemistries could be assigned as
2′′′S,3′′′S and 2′′′R,3′′′R, respectively, by comparison to
closely related model compounds (isopropyl replaces C-1′-
C-5′ as the diazepanone substituent) with very similar proton
coupling patterns.9 Conversely, the match of the model
systems with the more elaborate diazepanones 19 justifies
somewhat further the earlier use of the models to assign
relative stereochemistry. The C-2′′′ and C-3′′′ stereocenters
are of no consequence here, however, as both isomers were
readily converted to the same unsaturated diazepanone by
treatment with 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (toluene,
1 h).19 Separate N-methylation (formalin, sodium triacetoxy-
borohydride, CH3CN, HOAc, 60 °C, 12 h) gave 20 (83%
for two steps), the diazepanone epimeric at C-6′ with 11.
The reductive N-alkylation that provides 20 requires more
forcing conditions than that for 11 owing to the formation
of a stable intermediate oxazolidine (m/z 513) involving a
methylene-bridged C-5′/C-6′ erythro amino alcohol. The
situation where the C-6′ amino and C-5′ hydroxy are in close
proximity (small dihedral angle) is seen in the Newman
projection of 4 (Figure 1); O-cyclization of an (N-meth-
(16) Vorbru¨ggen, H.; Ruh-Polenz, C. Org. React. 2000, 55, 1-630.
(17) Knapp, S.; Gore, V. K. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 6744-6747, and
references therein.
(19) Knapp, S.; Nandan, S.; Resnick, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33,
5485-5486.
(18) Still, W.; Gennari, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 4405-4408.
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 4, 2002
605