Scheme 1. General Strategy for Amino Acid Synthesis
Scheme 2a
groups (X) at the R position. Stereoselective substitution at
the â position is also possible when an appropriately
substituted (R2 and/or R3 * H) allylic amine precursor is
used. An aromatic template was chosen to tether the
diazocarbonyl group to the amine in order to deliver a high
yielding intramolecular reaction. It was anticipated that the
aromatic group would also function as a protecting group
for the carboxyl and amino groups and would activate the
carboxyl group to permit direct coupling to other amino
acids. Thus, it was anticipated that exposure of the diazoke-
tone 1 to a suitable catalyst (MLn) would result in sequential
carbenoid and ylide (2) generation (Scheme 1). Subsequent
rearrangement would deliver the azalactone 3, which would
be converted into the amino acid 4 by lactone hydrolysis
and cleavage of the benzylic groups.
a Reagents and conditions: (a) (i) H2NCH2Ph, 4 Å sieves, EtOH,
(ii) NaBH4, EtOH, 96%; (b) BrCH2CHdCH2, K2CO3, MeCN 91%;
(c) (i) KH, THF, (ii) succinimidyl diazoacetate, THF, 45% (73%
based on recovered 7); (d) diketene, p-ABSA, Et3N, MeCN, 65%;
(e) ClCOCN2CO2Et, 2,6-lutidine, CH2Cl2, 74%; (f) t-BuMe2SiOTf,
i-Pr2NEt, Et2O, -78 °C, 75%; (g) K2CO3, D2O, THF, rt, 84% (96%
D-incorporation); (h) HO2CCH2PO(OEt)2, DCC, DMAP, CH2Cl2,
85%; (i) p-ABSA, DBU, MeCN, 62%.
transfer with p-ABSA afforded the R-phosphonyl diazoac-
etate 8f (Scheme 2).
The synthesis of the diazoketones required for initial
studies commenced with reductive amination of salicylal-
dehyde (5) with benzylamine (Scheme 2). Alkylation of the
amine 6 with allyl bromide delivered the amine 7 in excellent
yield. The diazoacetate 8a was prepared in reasonable yield
by treatment of the phenol 7 with succinimidyl diazoacetate.6
Diketene addition and in situ diazo transfer following Doyle’s
procedure gave poor yields of the diazoacetoacetate 8b.7
However, when p-acetamido-benzenesulfonyl azide (p-
ABSA) and triethylamine were used instead of methane-
sulfonyl azide and sodium acetate, the diazoacetoacetate 8b
was obtained in good yield.8 Acylation of the phenol 7 using
ethyl 2-diazomalonyl chloride provided the substrate 8c in
good yield.9 The diazoacetate 8d was prepared using Regitz’s
procedure: reaction of the diazoacetate 8a with tert-
butyldimethylsilyl triflate and Hu¨nig’s base.10 The synthesis
of the deuterated diazoacetate 8e (96% D-incorporation) was
accomplished by treatment of 8a with potassium carbonate
in D2O and THF. Finally, coupling of the phenol 7 to
diethylphosphonoacetic acid gave 9 and subsequent diazo
The copper- and rhodium-catalyzed generation of am-
monium ylides was investigated. In previous studies we had
shown that copper(II) acetylacetonate [Cu(acac)2] was the
best catalyst for carbenoid generation from unsubstituted
diazoketones. However, we and West and co-workers had
found that carbenoids generated using copper(II) hexafluo-
roacetylacetonate [Cu(hfacac)2] react with ethers to produce
oxonium ylides, which rearrange to give cyclic ethers in
excellent yield,11 and rhodium(II) acetate has been used to
generate ammonium ylides in an intermolecular fashion.12
To identify the best catalyst for ylide generation, we explored
the effectiveness of all three complexes (Table 1).
It transpired that similar yields of the rearrangement
products 10 were obtained using either Cu(acac)2 or Cu-
(hfacac)2, but inferior yields were obtained when Rh2(OAc)4
was used for carbenoid generation. A variety of groups could
be accommodated adjacent to the diazo group, allowing the
preparation of protected amino acids bearing ketone (10b),
ester (10c), and phosphonate (10f) groups at the R position.
Protected R-deuterated allyl glycine was also prepared.
Unfortunately, the copper-catalyzed reaction of the trialkyl-
silyl-substituted compound 10d afforded the C-H insertion
product 11 instead of the expected ylide rearrangement
(6) Quihia, A.; Rene, L.; Guilhem, J.; Pascard, C.; Badet, B. J. Org.
Chem. 1993, 58, 1641.
(7) Doyle, M. P.; Bagheri, V.; Wandless, T. J.; Harn, N. K.; Brinker, D.
A.; Eagle, C. T.; Loh, K. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 1906.
(8) Baum, J. S.; Shool. D. A.; Davies, H. M. L.; Smith, H. D. Synth.
Commun. 1987, 17, 1709.
(11) (a) Clark, J. S.; Krowiak, S. A.; Street, L. J.Tetrahedron Lett. 1993,
(9) Marino, J. P.; Osteerhout, A. T.; Price, A. T.; Sheehan, S. M.; Padwa,
A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 849.
(10) Mass, G.; Gimmy, M.; Regitz, M. J. Organomet. Chem. 1985, 290,
33.
34, 4385. (b) West, F. G.; Naidu, B. N.; Tester, R. W. J. Org. Chem. 1994,
59, 6892.
(12) Doyle, M. P.; Tamblyn, W. H.; Bagheri, V. J. Org. Chem. 1981,
46, 5094.
766
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 5, 2002