3
aReaction conditions: 2 mmol of the correspondingiodobenzene, 1 mmol
of the dialkyl or diaryl disulphide, 2 mmol of Zn, 3 mL of DMF, 0.3 mol %
of catalyst (1), 130 ºC for 22h. b110 ºC for 4h. c140 ºC for 16.5h.
dConversions obtained by GC-MS are based on residual iodobenzene and
are the average of two runs. eIsolated Yield.
3.
4.
D. Morales-Morales, Mini-Rev. Org. Chem., 2008, 5, 141–152.
W. Kuriyama, T. Matsumoto, O. Ogata, Y. Ino, K. Aoki, S.
Tanaka, K. Ishida, T. Kobayashi, N. Sayo and T. Saito, Org.
Process Res. Dev., 2012, 16, 166–171.
N. Selander and K. J Szabó, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111, 2048–2076.
D. Morales-Morales and C. M. Jensen, Eds., The Chemistry of
Pincer Compounds, Elsevier, 2007.
5.
6.
7.
D. F. Brayton, P. R. Beaumont, E. Y. Fukushima, H. T. Sartain, D.
Morales-Morales and C. M. Jensen, Organometallics, 2014, 33,
5198−5202.
The latter conditions were chosen to better observe the
potential effects of sterics and electronics on the yield of the
reactions. In terms of electronic effects, we did not make an
exhaustive comparison, however we compared three points
having as para substituents -H (0.0), -NH2 (-0.66) and -COCH3
(0.05) in terms of the Hammett parameter,48 although the amino
substrate was expected to show lower yields in comparison to -H
and -COCH3 we were glad to observe that even with this
substrate that typically hinders the reaction we got good yields
with the present catalytic system. Then, since the iodobenzene
para substituted with -COCH3 (4-Iodoacetophenone) produced
the best conversions we further evaluated the steric effect of
different substituents at the disulphide substrates on the C-S
coupling reactions using this substrate. In this study, we chose
functional groups with different size, namely phenyl, methyl, n-
butyl, sec-butyl and tert-butyl (Table 1). We observed that using
the substrate with less steric hindrance, dimethyl disulphide
(Entry 6, Table 1), the conversion was up to 91 %, while the
conversion with a more sterically demanding substrate, such as
di-tert-butyl disulphide, dramatically decreased to 10 %. Thus, it
is clear that the more steric hindrance of the disulphide
8.
9.
S. Chakraborty, P. Bhattacharya, H. Dai and H. Guan, Acc. Chem.
Res., 2015, 48, 1995–2003.
G. van Koten and R. A. Gossage, Eds., The Privileged Pincer-
Metal Platform: Coordination Chemistry & Applications, Springer
International Publishing, Cham, 2016, vol. 54.
10. D. Morales-Morales, H. Valdes, M. A. García-Eleno and D.
Canseco-Gonzalez, ChemCatChem, DOI:
10.1002/cctc.201702019, in press.
11. D. Srimani, A. Mukherjee, A. F. G. Goldberg, G. Leitus, Y.
Diskin Posner, L. J. W. Shimon, Y. Ben David and D. Milstein,
Angew. Chem., 2015, 127, 12534–12537.
12. J. R. Khusnutdinova, J. A. Garg and D. Milstein, ACS Catal.,
2015, 5, 2416–2422.
13. C. Gunanathan and D. Milstein, Chem. Rev., 2014, 114, 12024–
12087.
14. T. Zell, Y. Ben David and D. Milstein, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
Engl., 2014, 53, 4685–4689.
15. E. Balaraman, E. Khaskin, G. Leitus and D. Milstein, Nat. Chem.,
2013, 5, 122–125.
16. M. Asay and D. Morales-Morales, Dalton Trans., 2015, 44,
17432–17447.
17. M. Asay and D. Morales-Morales, Top. Organomet. Chem., 2016,
54, 239–268.
18. M. Albrecht and G. van Koten, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.,
2001, 40, 3750–3781.
substituents, the less conversion is obtained. This trend has been
previously observed by our research group leading to the
conclusion that this is due to the size of the cavity in the pincer
catalyst.37-41 And given the fact that no appreciable change in the
size of the cavity is produced by changing from the POCOP to
the POCSP system, a similar trend was expected.
19. M. E. van der Boom and D. Milstein, Chem. Rev., 2003, 103,
1759–1792.
20. H. Valdés, L. González-Sebastián and D. Morales-Morales, J.
Organomet. Chem., 2017, 845, 229–257.
21. D. Morales-Morales, Revista de la Sociedad Química de México,
2004, 48, 338–346.
22. G. T. Venkanna, H. D. Arman and Z. J. Tonzetich, ACS Catal.,
2014, 4, 2941–2950.
23. P. Gogoi, S. Hazarika, M. J. Sarma, K. Sarma and P. Barman,
Tetrahedron, 2014, 70, 7484–7489.
3. Conclusions
24. J. Zhang, C. M. Medley, J. A. Krause and H. Guan,
Organometallics, 2010, 29, 6393–6401.
25. C. C. Eichman and J. P. Stambuli, Molecules, 2011, 16, 590–608.
26. Y.-C. Wong, T. T. Jayanth and C. H. Cheng, Org. Lett., 2006, 8,
5613–5616.
We have synthesized a new non-symmetric Ni(II)
phosphinito-thiophosphinito PSCOP pincer compound. Complex
(1) was fully characterized, including the elucidation of its
molecular structure by single crystal X-ray diffraction
27. A. Byeun, K. Baek, M. S. Han and S. Lee, Tetrahedron Lett.,
2013, 54, 6712–6715.
28. C. F. Fu, Y.-H. Liu, S. M. Peng and S. T. Liu, Tetrahedron, 2010,
66, 2119–2122.
29. M. Platon, N. Wijaya, V. Rampazzi, L. Cui, Y. Rousselin, M.
Saeys and J.-C. Hierso, Chem. Eur. J., 2014, 20, 12584–12594.
30. H. Wang, L. Jiang, T. Chen and Y. Li, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2010,
2010, 2324–2329.
31. S. Jammi, S. Sakthivel, L. Rout, T. Mukherjee, S. Mandal, R.
Mitra, P. Saha and T. Punniyamurthy, J. Org. Chem., 2009, 74,
1971–1976.
32. S. Zhang, P. Qian, M. Zhang, M. Hu and J. Cheng, J. Org. Chem.,
2010, 75, 6732–6735.
33. P. Guan, C. Cao, Y. Liu, Y. Li, P. He, Q. Chen, G. Liu and Y. Shi,
Tetrahedron Lett., 2012, 53, 5987–5992.
34. S. Jammi, P. Barua, L. Rout, P. Saha and T. Punniyamurthy,
Tetrahedron Lett., 2008, 49, 1484–1487.
35. R. Singh, B. K. Allam, N. Singh, K. Kumari, S. K. Singh and K.
N. Singh, Adv. Synt. Catal., 2015, 357, 1181–1186.
36. Y. Zhang, K. C. Ngeow and J. Y. Ying, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 3495–
3498.
techniques. Complex (1) showed a good catalytic activity in C-S
couplings of iodobenzene with different disulfides. The catalytic
reaction was sensitive to the steric nature of the substrates
(disulfides), showing higher conversions with those having the
less sterically than with the more sterically hindered substituents.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Chem. Eng. Luis Velasco Ibarra, Dr.
Francisco Javier Pérez Flores, Q. Eréndira García Ríos, M.Sc.
Lucia del Carmen Márquez Alonso, M.Sc. Lucero Ríos Ruiz, Q.
María de la Paz Orta Pérez and Q. Roció Patiño-Maya for
technical assistance. H. V. would like to thank Programa de
Becas Posdoctorales-DGAPA-UNAM for postdoctoral
scholarships (Oficio: CJIC/CTIC/1060/2017). The financial
support of this research by PAPIIT (grant No. IN207317) is
gratefully acknowledged. J.D.C-G would like to thank Programa
de Cátedras CONACyT-PRY for generous support.
37. O. Baldovino-Pantaleón, S. Hernández Ortega and D. Morales-
Morales, Inorg. Chem. Commun., 2005, 8, 955–959.
38. O. Baldovino-Pantaleón, S. Hernández Ortega and D. Morales-
Morales, Adv. Synt. Catal., 2006, 348, 236–242.
39. M. Basauri Molina, S. Hernández Ortega and D. Morales-Morales,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2014, 4619–4625.
References and notes
1.
2.
D. Morales-Morales, Ed., Pincer Compounds. Chemistry and
Applications, Elsevier, 2018.
J. Serrano-Becerra and D. Morales-Morales, Curr. Org. Synth.,
2009, 6, 169–192.