724 J ournal of Natural Products, 2002, Vol. 65, No. 5
Notes
selection. HRMS spectra were determined using a PerSeptive
Biosystems Mariner TOF spectrometer.
(dark red or black solid, 1.0 mg, tR ) 15.1 min) and compound
2 (red solid, 1.0 mg, tR ) 21.1 min) were obtained.
Isola tion a n d Ta xon om y of th e Actin om ycete Str a in
IM 2670. The procedures for the isolation and taxonomic
characterization of the strain IM 2670 were as described by
Wang et al.18 The actinomycete strain IM 2670, from which
streptonigrin and its derivative were purified, was isolated
from a soil sample collected in the Singapore Botanic Garden.
Its colony exhibits properties characteristic of Micromonospora
on an ISP 4 medium plate. The colonies do not grow aerial
mycelium. Dark-colored spore accumulation forms on the
colony surface. Single spores are born on short sporephores
on the substrate mycelium. The color of the colony is orange.
No diffusible pigment was produced on ISP 2, ISP 3, ISP 4,
and Bennett medium plates. The cell wall peptidoglycans
contained meso-diaminopimelic acid. The complete nucleotide
sequence of the 16S rRNA gene of IM 2670 was determined
for phylogenetic analysis. IM 2670 was placed within the
Micromonospora clade on the phylogenetic tree, and the 16S
rRNA gene sequences are higher than 97% identical between
IM 2670 and other Micromonospora species. On the basis of
morphological, chemotaxonomic, and phylogenetic evidences,
the actinomycete strain IM 2670 was assigned to the genus
Micromonospora.
Two HPLC fractions (method A, 25.5-27.0 min, major peak
tR ) 26.4 min and 28.5-29.5 min, major peak tR ) 28.9 min)
were purified by preparative TLC (5% MeOH in CHCl3) to give
a white solid 3 (2.5 mg) and a pale yellow solid 4 (1.7 mg),
respectively. In a scaled-up fermentation (10 L), the CH2Cl2
extract was first purified by Si flash chromatography (gradient
CH2Cl2-MeOH) and then followed by HPLC purification.
Compound 1 (8.4 mg) and a red solid 11 (20 mg, HPLC
fraction, 16.5-17.0 min, major peak tR ) 16.8 min at 450 nm,
method A) were obtained.
Str ep ton igr in (1): red or black solid; UV (65% MeOH in
H2O with 0.04% TFA) λmax (relative absorption) 245 (1.00),
292-302 (sh, 0.46), 374 (0.44) nm; NMR data, see Table 1;
HRESIMS m/z 507.1499 (calcd for C25H23N4O8 + H, 507.1516).
5-Am in o-4-(2-h ydr oxy-3,4-dim eth oxyph en yl)-6-[6-m eth -
oxy-7-(1-m et h yl-2-oxop r op yla m in o)-5,8-d ioxo-5,8-d ih y-
d r oqu in olin -2-yl]-3-m eth ylp yr id in e-2-ca r boxylic a cid or
7-(1-m eth yl-2-oxop r op yl)str ep ton igr in (2): red solid; UV
(65% MeOH in H2O with 0.04% TFA) λmax (relative absorption)
250 (1.00), 295-305 (sh, 0.40), 377 (0.42) nm; NMR data, see
Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 577.1935 (calcd for C29H28N4O9 + H,
577.1968).
High -Th r ou gh p u t Scr een s (HTS). HTS was performed
in transparent 96-well plates (Nunclon). Neuroblastoma cell
lines SH-SY5Y and SH-SY5Y-5.6 containing HA-tagged 91
amino acid mini p53 protein were employed in the primary
screens.2 Cell cytotoxicity was measured by using the Kit
CellTiter 96 AQueous Non-Radioactive Proliferation Assay
(105 cells/mL) in 100 µL of RPMI media containing hygromycin
(0.1 mg/mL) was plated out the day before. The cells were
incubated with 1 µL of crude extracts for 24 h. At the 20th
hour, MTS (Owen’s reagent, or 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-
(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium,
inner slat), prepared according to manufacturer’s direction,
was added to a final concentration of 0.04 mg/well and
incubated for 4 h at 37 °C. The plates were read at OD490 in a
multilabel counter (Wallac 1420 Victor). Reference control
wells containing cells and blank wells containing media only
were treated with the appropriate amount of methanol.
Extracts, which were found to kill at least 70% of SH-SY5Y
cells but less than 35% of SH-5Y-5.6, were repeated in
duplicates in 96-well plates. Samples that exhibited reproduc-
ible inhibition were subjected to dose-response experiments.
Those with distinctive dose-response curves were selected for
western blotting.
Ack n ow led gm en t . This work was supported by grants
from the Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*Star)
of Singapore. Dr. Victor C. Yu, Dr. Yue Wang, and Dr. Mui
Mui Sim are also an Adjunct Staff Member (Department of
Pharmacology), Adjunct Associate Professor (Department of
Microbiology), and Adjunct Senior Fellow (Department of
Biochemistry), respectively, at the National University of
Singapore.
Su p p or tin g In for m a tion Ava ila ble: NMR, UV, and MS data for
compounds
3 and 4; preparative procedures and NMR data for
compounds 6, 9, and 10. This material is available free of charge via
the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
Refer en ces a n d Notes
(1) (a) May, P.; May, E. Oncogene 1999, 18, 7621-7636. (b) Prives, C.;
Hall, P. A. J . Pathol. 1999, 187, 112-126.
(2) Ronca, F.; Chan, S.-L.; Yu, V. C. J . Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 4252-
4260.
(3) The Combined Chemical Dictionary on CD-ROM (version 4:2); Chap-
man & Hall/CRC Press: New York, 2001.
(4) Herlt, A. J .; Rickards, R. W.; Wu, J .-P. J . Antibiot. 1985, 38, 516-
Isola tion a n d P u r ifica tion P r oced u r es. The bioassay-
active fermentation broth (4 L) of Micromonospora sp. IM 2670
was freeze-dried. The solid residue was extracted with MeOH
(3.5 L) and 10% H2O in MeOH (2 L × 2) at room temperature.
The bioassay-active extracts were combined and concentrated
under reduced pressure below 35 °C. The wet residue was
diluted with MeOH (250 mL) and H2O (250 mL), and then the
solution was extracted with hexane (300 mL × 3), CH2Cl2 (300
mL × 3), ethyl acetate (300 mL × 3), and n-butanol (300 mL
× 3). The bioassay data showed that the CH2Cl2 extract (11
g) was most active. This extract was purified (separately in
two equal portions) by a preparative HPLC system (Waters
Delta Prep 4000) equipped with a 996 photodiode array
detector, using Prep Nova-Pak HRC18 column segments (6 µm,
40 mm × 210 mm; flow rate, 30 mL/min; solvent A ) H2O +
0.04% TFA, B ) MeOH + 0.04% TFA; 5% to 100% B in 30
min, linear gradient, then 100% B for additional 5 min, method
A). Fractions corresponding to different peaks were collected.
The most active fraction (27.0-28.5 min, containing two major
peaks at tR ) 27.3 and 28.1 min, 370 nm) was further purified
by preparative TLC (silica, 15% MeOH in CHCl3) to give two
bands. They were separately subjected to another HPLC
purification (Novapak, C18, 19 × 300 mm, flow 10 mL/min, 65%
B for 30 min, then 65% to 100% B in 5 min, and maintained
at 100% B for an additional 5 min, method B). Compound 1
518.
(5) Isshiki, K.; Sawa, T.; Miura, K.; Li, B.; Naganawa, H.; Hamada, M.;
Takeuchi, T.; Umezawa, H. J . Antibiot. 1986, 39, 1013-1015.
(6) Shin, C.-G.; Hayakawa, M.; Mikami, K.; Yoshimura, J . Tetrahedron
Lett. 1977, 863-866.
(7) Kanzaki, H.; Yanagisawa, S.; Nitoda, T. J . Antibiot. 2000, 53, 1257-
1264.
(8) Gurney, K. A.; Mantle, P. G. J . Nat. Prod. 1993, 56, 1194-1198.
(9) (a) Meyer, J .-M.; Aballah, M. A. J . Gen. Microbiol. 1980, 118, 125-
129, and references therein. (b) Bergeron, R. J .; McManis, J . S.
Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 5881-5888.
(10) (a) Krishna, M. C.; Halevy, R. F.; Zhang, R.; Gutierrez, P. L.; Samuni,
A. Free Rad. Biol. Med. 1994, 17, 379-388. (b) White, J . R.; Yeowell,
H. N. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1982, 106, 407-411.
(11) Bolza´n, A. D.; Bianchi, M. S. Mutat. Res. 2001, 488, 25-37.
(12) )Rao, K. V.; Rock, C. P. J . Heterocycl. Chem. 1996, 33, 447-458.
(13) Eastman, A. Cancer Cells 1990, 2, 275-280.
(14) Gonza´lez, V. M.; Fuertes, M. A.; Pe´rez-Alvarez, M. J .; Gervantes, G.;
Moreno, V.; Alonso, C.; Pe´rez, J . M. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2000, 60,
371-379.
(15) Fritche, M.; Haessler, C.; Brandner, G. Oncogene 1993, 8, 307-318.
(16) Chikayama, S.; Sugano, T.; Takahashi, Y.; Ikeda, M.; Kimura, S.;
Kobayashi, Y.; Kondo, M. Int. J . Oncol. 2000, 16, 1117-1124.
(17) )Wang, H.; Lim, K. L.; Yeo, S. L.; Xu, X.; Sim, M. M.; Ting, A. E.;
Wang, Y.; Yee, S.; Tan, Y. H.; Pallen, C. J . J . Nat. Prod. 2000, 63,
1641-1646.
(18) ) Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Ruan, J .; Wang, Y.; Ali, S. M. J . Ind. Microbiol.
Biotech. 1999, 23, 178-187.
NP0104572