panoates 16, which may be prepared from 12 and 2-diazo-
3-trimethylsilyloxy-3-butenoate 15, using a rhodium(II)
catalyst under the same conditions. It was envisaged that 17
would be formed upon insertion of carbene or carbenoid,
generated from 16, into the N-H bond of the alkylamino
group at C-3. This would occur in view of the formation of
various products by tandem cyclization-cycloaddition se-
quence of rhodium(II) carbenoids and application of the
resulting metallocarbenoids to a wide variety of hetero-
cycles.11
Scheme 6
Compounds 1210 and 1511 were prepared according to
documented procedures. Treatment of 12 with Hg(OAc)2 (1.2
equiv) in CH2Cl2 at room temperature, followed by addition
of 15 (1 equiv) gave diazocarbonyl compounds 16 in good
yields as expected. All of the compounds 16 were stable in
air and recrystallizable from a mixture of CH2Cl2 and
n-hexane. Subsequent treatment of 16 with a catalytic amount
of Rh2(OAc)4‚2H2O (0.5 mg) in benzene for 30 min at reflux
afforded 5,6-dihydro-4H-thieno[3,2-b]pyrrol-5-ones 18 rather
envisaged that there exists a hydrogen bond between the
carbonyl oxygen and a hydrogen on an alkylamino group as
depicted in the intermediates 20 and 21. A cis relationship
of diazo and carbonyl is highly preferred in diazo ketones
of the type RCOCHN2.13 The cis form represents a desirable
feature of the migrating group being trans to the leaving
group. As a result, the rhodium carbenoids 20 and 21 undergo
Wolff rearrangement to give a ketene 22. The ketene
functional group would be rapidly trapped by an intra-
molecular nucleophilic attack of the alkylamino group at C-3
of the thienyl ring to give 18.
1
than thieno[3,2-b]pyrrol-6-ones 17. The H NMR spectra
(300 MHz, CDCl3) of 18 showed a singlet at 4.42-4.60 ppm,
assigned to a methine proton of 18, and two sets of alkyl
protons corresponding to N-alkyl and alkoxycarbonyl groups,
which indicates that the products exist as a mixture of keto
forms 18 and enol forms 19. The ratios of 18 and 19 were
determined on the basis of the intensities of N-alkyl proton
absorptions.12 Yields of compounds 16, 18, and 19 are
summarized in Table 1.
Treatment of a mixture of 16a (70 mg, 0.213 mmol) and
n-PrSH (486 mg, 6.39 mmol) with Rh2(OAc)4‚2H2O (0.5
mg) in benzene for 3 h at reflux gave 23a (47%), a dimer of
18a together with an insertion product 24 (6 mg, 7%) and
unknown mixtures, which are inseparable by chromatography
(Scheme 7). On the other hand, the reaction of 16a (70 mg,
Table 1. Yields of Compounds 16, 18 + 19, and 23
yield,a
R1 R3 compd 16 18+19 (keto: enol) 23
%
entry
Ar
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Me Et
Me t-Bu
Et Et
Et t-Bu
Bn Et
Bn t-Bu
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
91
87
71
79
73
82
71
68
74
71
71
72
99 (1:1.26)
94 (1:0.87)
90 (1:1.46)
91 (1:0.78)
91 (1:1.23)
89 (1:0.70)
97 (1:0.88)
95 (1:0.65)
95 (1:1.11)
93 (1:0.77)
92 (1:2.07)
90 (1:2.33)
89
89
86
91
96
91
87
90
75
87
86
88
Scheme 7a
4-MeOC6H4 Me Et
4-MeOC6H4 Me t-Bu
4-MeOC6H4 Et Et
10 4-MeOC6H4 Et t-Bu
11 3-ClC6H4
12 3-ClC6H4
j
k
l
Me Et
Et Et
a Isolated yields. Compounds 16 are yellow solids except for 16h (yellow
liquid). Mixtures of compounds 18 and 19 are pale yellowish sticky liquids.
Compounds 23 are pale yellow solids.
The exclusive formation of thieno[3,2-b]pyrrol-5-ones may
be rationalized by assuming a cis relationship of rhodium
carbenoid and the keto carbonyl group (Scheme 6). It is
0.213 mmol) with ethyl vinyl ether (460 mg, 6.39 mmol) in
the presence of the same catalyst for 30 min at reflux gave
23a in 90% yield.
It has been found that compounds 18 were labile and
underwent slow dimerization reactions to give compounds
(9) Wensbo, D.; Annby, U.; Gronowitz, S. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 10323.
(10) Kim, B.; Kim, K. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 3690.
(11) (a) Ye, T.; McKervey, M. A. Chem. ReV. 1994, 94, 1091. (b) Padwa,
A.; Hornbuckle, S. F. Chem. ReV. 1991, 91, 263. (c) Padwa, A.; Weingarten,
M. D. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 223. (d) Ueda, Y.; Roberge, G.; Vinet, V.
Can. J. Chem. 1984, 62, 2936.
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 6, 2002
875