Table 1. Lewis Acid Induced Cyclization to Bicyclic Ethers
entry substratesa promotorb
products
1
2
3
4
5
8a OEt
7a , 8a (2:1) SnCl4
7bc
7bc
7cc
7d c
SnCl4
13b (53%)
13a , 13b (2:1, 48 %)19
14a (12%), 14b (43%)
14b (56%)
SnCl4
TMSOTf
SnCl4
15 (50%)
16 (8:1, 60%)
Figure 2. Diastereoselective hydroboration of the propenyl deriva-
tive 3d.
6
SnCl4
7
8
11, 12 (2:1) SnCl4
11, 12 (2:1) TMSOTf
17a (5%), 17b (33%), 17c (19%)
17b, 17c (2:1, 59%)
9
9a
9b
9c
9d
BF3‚Et2O 19a , 19b (2:1, 69%)
BF3‚Et2O 20 (72%)
BF3‚Et2O 21 (71%)
°C).15 This result is in contrast to the findings described by
Gilchrist et al.
10
11
12
In the case of the propenyl derivative 3d, the hydroboration
was highly diastereoselective (8:1). The relative stereochem-
istry was assigned on the basis of the model of Houk et al.16
According to this model, anti-diols are produced via a
staggered transition state I where the substituents R1 and OR2
occupy the anti and outside positions, respectively (Figure
2). This assignment could be confirmed at a later stage (vide
infra).
To probe the influence of an alkoxy substituent, located
next to the acetal function, on the cyclization reaction, the
substrate 10 was prepared from D-ribose via a sequence of
acetalization, acetonide formation, Swern oxidation, and
Wittig olefination.17 A subsequent hydroboration and Suzuki
coupling with 6a provided the compound 11 together with
12 in good yield (11:12 ) 2:1).
Cyclization Reactions. As has been described by Over-
man et al.,18 alkenylsilane cyclizations onto acetals are best
performed with tin(IV) chloride or trimethylsilyl triflate as
promoters in dichloromethane as the solvent. On the other
hand, cyclization with vinyl sulfide terminators seems to be
more efficient with borontrifluoride etherate (BF3‚Et2O) in
tert-butylmethyl ether. Accordingly, we applied similar
conditions with our substrates. These results are summarized
in Table 1 (for the structures, see Figure 3).
BF3‚Et2O 22a , 22b (8:1, 73%)
a Concentration of the starting material, 0.02 M; reaction scale, 30-60
mg. b TMSOTf (1.5 equiv), SnCl4 (1.5 equiv), and BF3‚Et2O (2.0 equiv)
were used; reactions with TMSOTf and SnCl4 were carried out in CH2Cl2
and reactions with BF3‚Et2O in tBuOMe. c Particular pure fractions
(containing less than 10% of the rearranged isomer 8) were used. In these
small-scale cyclizations, the ∆3,4-bicyclic ether could not be detected.
vinyl sulfide derivatives (2-thiophenylalkenes) proceeds most
likely via an intramolecular Prins cyclization (intermediate
O generating N and/or P). This pathway is supported by the
electronic nature of the thiophenyl group. The subsequent
elimination of a proton from the carbocation can take place
in two directions. The regiochemistry of the elimination
depends on the size of the cyclic oxonium ion and the
stability of the cyclized products. The six-membered oxo-
nium ion gave only the ∆4,5-bicyclic ether, whereas the
seven-membered oxonium ions gave mainly the ∆3,4-bicyclic
ether. In the case of five-membered oxonium ions, a mixture
of the two possible double-bond isomers is formed. The
product ratio is in part reflected in the calculated heat of
formation (HyperChem 6.02).20
The ribose derivative could also be induced to cyclize.
For the cyclization, a 2:1 mixture of the 2- and 1-trimeth-
From these experiments, the following conclusions can
be made (Figure 4). (a) The 2-trimethylsilylalkenes prefer
an ene-type cyclization (leading to N via transition state L
and intermediate M) irrespective of the ring size of the cyclic
oxonium ion. An intramolecular Prins reaction would gener-
ate products with an exocyclic methylene group, but no such
product was observed in any of these cases. Usually, ene
cyclizations are accompanied by protodesilylation, presum-
ably by adventitious HCl generated inside the reaction flask
or during workup (N, R ) H). (b) The cyclization of the
(12) For reviews, see: (a) Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. Chem. ReV. 1995,
95, 2457-2483. (b) Chemler, S. R.; Trauner, D.; Danishefsky, S. J. Angew.
Chem. 2001, 113, 4676-4701; 2001, 40, 4544-4568.
(13) Miyaura, N.; Ishiyama, T.; Sasaki, H.; Ishikawa, M.; Satoh, M.;
Suzuki, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 314-321.
(14) Ennis, D. S.; Gilchrist, T. L. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 2623-2632.
(15) Trost, B. M.; Lee, C. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6818-6819.
(16) Houk, K. N.; Rondan, N. G.; Wu, Y.-D.; Metz, J. T.; Paddon-Row,
M. N. Tetrahedron 1984, 40, 2257-2274.
(17) Ugarkar, B. G.; DaRe, J. M.; Kopcho, J. J.; Brown, C. E., III;
Schanzer, J. M.; Wiesner, J. B.; Erion, M. D. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43,
2883-2893.
(18) Blumenkopf, T. A.; Bratz, M.; Castan˜eda, A.; Look, G. C.; Overman,
L. E.; Rodriguez, D.; Thompson, A. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 4386-
4399.
Figure 3. Structures of cyclization products (cf. Table 1).
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 8, 2002
1273