4070 Organometallics, Vol. 26, No. 16, 2007
Go´rski et al.
As calculated earlier,9 the four ν(CtO) bands of bis(ethene)
complex cis-1 (a1(1), a1(2), b1, and b2 modes) shift upon the one-
electron oxidation to higher frequencies by 66, 84, 70, and 114
cm-1, respectively. The vibration of the two CO ligands in trans
positions to the ethene ligands corresponds to the b mode at
2052 cm-1 in cis-1+ (C2 symmetry) and to the b2 mode at 1938
cm-1 in neutral complex cis-1 (C2V symmetry). The energetic
separation between these two modes, ∆ν ) 114 cm-1 for cis-
1/cis-1+, increases significantly to 175 cm-1 and 194 cm-1 for
the couples 3/3+ and 4/4+. On the other hand, much smaller
wavenumber differences have been determined for vibrations
of two mutually trans carbonyl ligands in the redox couples
trans-1/trans-1+ (∆ν ) 59 cm-1) and trans-2/trans-2+ (∆ν )
88 cm-1). From the comparison of these ∆ν values it is clear
that the one-electron oxidation of a tetracarbonyl W(0) complex
containing two mutually cis-arranged olefin ligands removes
the electron density to a higher extent from π-orbitals represent-
ing the W-CO bonds trans to the W-olefin bonds than from
the W-CO π-bond of the mutually trans carbonyl ligands. For
this reason, the lability of the carbonyl ligands in the oxidized
complexes should correlate with the ∆ν value increasing in the
order cis-1+ < 3+ < 4+. This reasoning may partly explain the
observed high reactivity of the 17e complex with chelating
norbornadiene (4+) compared with the fairly high stability of
the cationic bis(ethene) complex cis-1+. The decarbonylation
of 4+ (detectable in situ at 243 K) was indeed confirmed by IR
spectroscopic monitoring.
The ∆ν separation of the e mode of trans-1 (D2d) and the b2
mode of trans-1+ (D2), both corresponding to vibrations of the
two mutually trans CO ligands, amounts 59 cm-1 (243 K). This
value is thus much smaller than those characterizing the
vibration of the CO ligands in trans positions to the olefin
ligands in complexes cis-1, 3, and 4 and their 1e-oxidized forms
(see above). These data suggest that the one-electron oxidation
of bis(olefin) complexes trans-1 and trans-2 removes the
electron density mainly from the π-orbitals of the tungsten-
olefin bonds, inducing dissociation of the olefin ligands. This
behavior corresponds nicely with the formation of [W(CO)6]
in the course of the oxidation of complex trans-1 at 243 K,
where no trans f cis isomerization takes place. For the redox
couple trans-2/trans-2+, the larger ∆ν value of 88 cm-1 for the
e and b2 modes, respectively, is fully in line with the higher
stability of trans-2+ compared to trans-1+. Norbornene is also
a stronger σ-donor than ethene, as testified by the smaller ν-
(CtO) wavenumbers of trans-2 compared to those of trans-4
(Table 2), capable of better stabilizing the W(I) oxidation state.
At the same time, the greater steric demands of the mutually
cis-arranged norbornene ligands in hypothetical cis-2+ compared
to the smaller ethene in cis-1+ can be considered as a plausible
explanation for the completely hindered trans f cis isomer-
ization of 1e-oxidized trans-2+.
cis-isomer affects mainly the W-CO bonds trans to the
W-olefin bonds. The lability of these carbonyl ligands ought
to be higher in 17-electron diene complexes 3+ and 4+ than the
carbonyls in bis(alkene) complexes trans-1+ and trans-2+. The
comparison of the ∆ν(CtO) shifts has further revealed that in
the latter two cations the oxidation mainly weakened the
W-alkene bonds. The analysis of the bonding situation is
consistent with the facile decarbonylation of 4+ even at low
temperatures and observation of [W(CO)6] in the IR spectra of
trans-1+.
At room temperature, cation trans-1+ undergoes spontaneous
trans f cis isomerization, in agreement with higher thermo-
dynamic stability of cis-1+ as computed by DFT. The absence
of trans f cis isomerization for trans-2+ has been tentatively
ascribed to steric hindrance of the bulky norbornene ligands in
mutual cis positions.
Experimental Section
General Procedures. Standard inert-atmosphere techniques were
used for all syntheses and sample manipulations. Dichloromethane
(Acros; analytical quality) was dried over P2O5 and freshly distilled
under nitrogen. The supporting electrolyte Bu4NPF6 (Aldrich) was
recrystallized twice from absolute ethanol and dried overnight under
vacuum at ca. 80 °C. [W(CO)]6 (Merck) was used as received.
Olefins (Sigma-Aldrich) were dried over CaH2 and distilled under
nitrogen prior to use.
Syntheses. The preparation of the studied olefin complexes
(Chart 1) trans-[W(CO)4(η2-ethene)2] (trans-1),11 trans-[W(CO)4-
(η2-norbornene)2] (trans-2),18 [W(CO)4(η4-cycloocta-1,5-diene)]
(3),17 and [W(CO)4(η4-norbornadiene)] (1)17 was based on literature
procedures. All compounds were prepared by photochemical
substitution of two CO ligands in [W(CO)6] by olefin in n-heptane.
Complexes 2, 3, and 4 were purified by sublimation under vacuum
at 80 °C, and complex 1 by column chromatography on silica, using
1
n-heptane as the eluent. Their identity was verified by H NMR
and IR spectroscopy.
Cyclic Voltammetry. Conventional cyclic voltammograms of
10-3 M complexes 1-4 in dichloromethane containing 10-1 M Bu4-
NPF6 were recorded with a PAR model 283 potentiostat, using an
airtight and light-protected single-compartment cell placed in a
Faraday cage. A Pt disk (0.4 mm diameter) working electrode was
polished with a 0.25 µm diamond paste between scans. Coiled Pt
and Ag wires served as an auxiliary and pseudoreference electrode,
respectively. All electrode potentials are reported against the
standard ferrocene/ferrocenium (Fc/Fc+) couple. Ferrocene (BDH)
or cobaltocenium hexafluorophosphate (Aldrich) were added as
internal standards.19,20 After the scans at room temperature, the cell
was cooled by a dry ice-acetone slurry.
Spectroelectrochemistry. Infrared spectroelectrochemistry was
carried out with a cryostatted optically transparent thin-layer
electrochemical (OTTLE) cell equipped with a Pt minigrid working
electrode and CaF2 windows.21 The course of the anodic electrolyses
was monitored with thin-layer cyclic voltammetry and infrared
spectroscopy, using a Bio-Rad FTS-7 FTIR spectrometer (16 scans,
spectral resolution of 2 cm-1). The OTTLE cell potential was
controlled by a PA4 potentiostat (EKOM, Polna´, Czech Republic).
The electrolyzed dichloromethane solutions contained 5 × 10-3
Conclusions
These results document that infrared thin-layer spectroelec-
trochemistry at variable temperatures is a valuable tool to study
the anodic processes in tungsten(0) carbonyls with olefin and
diene ligands in different (trans and cis) arrangements.
(17) King, R. B.; Fronzaglia, A. Inorg. Chem. 1966, 5, 1837-1846.
(18) Go´rski, M.; Kochel, A.; Szyman´ska-Buzar, T. Organometallics 2004,
23, 3037-3046.
(19) Gritzner, G.; Ku˚ta, J. Pure Appl. Chem. 1984, 56, 462-466.
(20) Stojanovic, R. S.; Bond, A. M. Anal. Chem. 1993, 65, 56-64.
(21) (a) Hartl, F.; Luyten, H.; Nieuwenhuis, H. A.; Schoemaker, G. C.
Appl. Spectrosc. 1994, 48, 1522-1528. (b) Mahabiersing, T.; Luyten, H.;
Nieuwendam, R. C.; Hartl, F. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 2003, 68,
1687-1709.
The IR spectroscopic data show that the one-electron oxida-
tion of the neutral parent complexes can be generally assigned
as W(0) f W(I). However, the magnitude of the high-frequency
ν(CtO) shifts depends on the mutual positions of the carbonyl
and olefin ligands, suggesting that significant electron density
is removed from different W-olefin and W-carbonyl π-orbit-
als. In particular, the one-electron oxidation of a tetracarbonyl