Y. Nagao et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 1519–1522
1521
Table 3. Effect of the reaction temperature on the Pummerer reaction of rac-1 using TMSOTfa
Entry
Solvent
Temp (°C)
Time
Yield (%)b
Ratioc
:
rac-2
rac-3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
DMF
Reflux
Rt
0
−20
−40
Rt
2 min
5 min
5 min
24 h
24 h
3 h
60
90
95
94
90
92
41d
60
76
82
88
91
3
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
–
40
24
18
12
9
97
96
DMF
DMF
0
12 h
30 h
4
e
−40
–
a All reactions with the use of Ac2O (5 mol equiv.) and Lewis acid (3 mol equiv.) were carried out in CH2Cl2 or DMF.
b Total yield of rac-2 and rac-3.
c Determined by 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) analysis.
d Rac-1 was obtained in 33% recovery.
e No reaction.
esterase and protease inhibitors, as illustrated in Fig.
1.11
Acknowledgements
This work was in part supported by a Grant-in-Aid for
Scientific Research (B)(2)(No. 12470482) from Japan
Society for the Promotion of Science.
Scheme 3.
References
1. (a) Pummerer, R. Chem. Ber. 1909, 42, 2282; (b) Pum-
merer, R. Chem. Ber. 1910, 43, 1401; (c) Horner, L.;
Kaiser, P. Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1959, 626, 19; (d)
Horner, L. Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1960, 631, 198; (e)
Numata, T.; Oae, S. Yuki Gosei Kagaku Kyokaishi 1977,
35, 726; (f) Kita, Y.; Shibata, N. Synlett 1996, 289; (g)
Volonterio, A.; Zanda, M.; Bravo, P.; Fronza, G.; Cavic-
chio, G.; Crucianelli, M. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 8031.
2. (a) Ishibashi, H.; Ikeda, M. Yuki Gosei Kagaku Kyokaishi
1989, 47, 330; (b) De Lucchi, O.; Miotti, U.; Modena, G.
Org. React. 1991, 40, 157; (c) Kita, Y.; Shibata, N.;
Kawano, N.; Tohjo, T.; Fujimori, C.; Ohishi, H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 5116; (d) Padwa, A.; Gunn, D. E.,
Jr.; Osterhout, M. H. Synthesis 1997, 1353; (e) Jousse, C.;
Desmae¨le, D. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 909; (f) Bennasar,
M.-L.; Zulaica, E.; Ram´ırez, A.; Bosch, J. Tetrahedron
1999, 55, 3117.
3. (a) Russell, G. A.; Mikol, G. J. In Mechanisms of Molec-
ular Migrations; Thyagarajan, B. S., Ed.; Wiley-Inter-
science: New York, 1968; Vol. 1, p. 157; (b) Oae, S.;
Numata, T.; Yoshimura, T. In The Chemistry of the
Sulphonium Group, Part 2; Stirling, C. J. M.; Patai, S.,
Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1981; p. 571.
4. (a) Oae, S.; Kitao, T.; Kawamura, S. Tetrahedron 1963,
19, 1783; (b) Johnson, C. R.; Sharp, J. C.; Phillips, W. G.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1967, 8, 5299; (c) Parham, W. E.;
Edwards, L. D. J. Org. Chem. 1968, 33, 4150; (d) Russell,
G. A.; Sabourin, E. T. J. Org. Chem. 1969, 34, 2336; (e)
Davenport, D. A; Moss, D. B.; Rhodes, J. E.; Walsh, J.
Figure 1. Design of new enzyme inhibitors.
the amide carbonyl and cyano groups. In CH2Cl2,
TMSOTf, TBDMSOTf and BF3·OEt2 may be predomi-
nantly coordinated by the amide carbonyl group of
rac-1 causing a more acidic outcome of the methylene
protons of CH2CONHCHPh2 than that of the methyl-
ene protons of CH2CO2Me.10 In DMF and MeCN,
their amide carbonyl and cyano groups may exclusively
coordinate to TMSOTf, TBDMSOTf and BF3·OEt2,
and thus a higher acidic property of the methylene
protons of CH2CO2Me than that of the methylene
protons of CH2CONHCHPh2 in rac-1 must furnish the
high chemoselectivity to give rac-3.
The sutructures of rac-2 and rac-3 were explicitly deter-
mined by their alkaline hydrolyses, as shown in Scheme
3. Treatment of rac-2 or rac-3 with 1N NaOH in
MeOH gave each characteristic product, glyoxylic
amide 8 (77% yield) or mercaptoacetic amide 9 (69%
yield). These particular reactions seem to be useful for
a molecular design of new suicide substrates as the