synthesised 6+ as an analogue without the porphyrin unit.
Indeed, photolysis of complex 6+ in THF with visible light (l
> 495 nm) in the presence of triethylamine yields no prod-
ucts.
Table 2 Reduction potentials
Complex
Solvent E1/2(I)/V (vs. Fc/Fc+) Ref
1+
THF
THF
THF
THF
MeCN
THF
THF
21.44a
21.75c
21.45
21.65
21.47e
21.69
21.83
b
b
b
b
2
6+
[Re(CO)3(dmb)(3-Me-Py)]+d
[Re(CO)3(bpy)(3-Me-Py)]+
[Re(CO)3(bpy)(THF)]+
[Re(CO)3(bpy)Br]
11
8
b 8
a Partly chemically irreversible. b This work. c Totally irreversible. d dmb =
4,4A-dimethyl-2,2A-bipyridine. e Conversion using Fc/Fc+ = 380 mV vs.
SCE in MeCN ([Et4N][ClO4] electrolyte).
The electron-transfer mechanism was also tested by cyclic
voltammetry together with UV-Vis and IR spectroelectrochem-
ical studies. UV-Vis spectra show that the reversible oxidation
of 1+ and 2 is based on the porphyrin macrocycle and occurs at
the same potential as for 5 and Zn(TPP) (380 mV vs. Fc/Fc+ in
THF) (Fig. 2).
chemically irreversible. At room temperature in THF, the
reduced species 1· readily undergoes ligand substitution with
other nucleophiles. On reduction of 1+ in the presence of
bromide ions, the 3-Me-pyridine is displaced by bromide and
the radical anion 2·2 formed is reoxidised (Tables 1 and 2) to
compound 2 quantitatively.
The rhenium-free analogue 5 is effectively photo-reduced by
triethylamine to the porphyrin radical anion 5·2, confirming
that Et3N can transfer an electron to the excited state of this
porphyrin. The driving force for intramolecular electron transfer
is 20.25 eV for 1+ and ca. 0.06 eV for 2.†
In spite of the similarities between 1+ and 2 noted above,
there are great differences in their photochemical and electro-
chemical properties. Remarkably, compound 2 does not
undergo photochemical reduction under the same conditions.
Complex 2 is reduced at more negative potential than 1+ (Table
2) and the cyclic voltammogram shows an irreversible reduction
wave in THF (Fig. 2). Nevertheless, IR spectroelectrochemistry
of 2 demonstrates that the axial ligand is displaced by THF
during the reduction and subsequent reoxidation giving the
cationic THF complex 3+. The differences between 1+ and 2 are
not yet fully understood.
In conclusion, the introduction of the porphyrin into the
design of 1+ induces substitution at a remote site as a
consequence of photo-induced electron transfer. This is one of
the principles of supramolecular photochemistry described by
Balzani and Scandola but has not previously been observed in a
porphyrin metal carbonyl supermolecule.1
Fig. 2 Cyclic voltamograms of 1+, 2 and 5 in THF ([NBu4][PF6], 300 K,
scan rate 100 mV s21 and Fc/Fc+ as internal standard).
IR spectroelectrochemistry indicates that the reduction
occurs on the rhenium bipyridine site for both 1+ and 2
(compare spin distribution for [Re(CO)3(bpy)L]0).9,10 The
reduction waves for 1+ and 2 in Fig. 2 are notably different from
simple models such as 6+, [Re(CO)3(bpy)Br] and from 5. For 1+
the reduction in THF is partly chemically reversible while for
the model 6+ it is reversible. IR spectroelectrochemistry allows
identification of the reduction products thanks to the extensive
literature on [ReI(CO)3(bpy)L]n complexes.8,10–12 During re-
duction of 1+ in an OTTLE cell, three new IR bands grow in at
2016, 1914 and 1892 cm21 (Fig 1(b)); since they are identical to
those in the IR spectra of [Re(CO)3(bpy)(THF)]+ and the
photoproduct (Fig. 1(a)), they are assigned to 3+.8 The radical 1·
is expected at lower frequencies and reduction at low tem-
perature (223 K) in butyronitrile gives bands at 2010, 1903 and
1893 cm21 consistent with a radical (Table 1).10 Thus reduction
of 1+ occurs at the rhenium bipyridine site whereas reduction of
5 necessarily occurs at the porphyrin. No ligand substitution
occurs without reduction; hence the radical 1· must be the
species that undergoes substitution. Electrode potentials listed
in Table 2 reveal that, at the potential where 1· is formed,
[Re(CO)3(bpy)(THF)]· is reoxidised to the corresponding
cation. The latter should be a good model for 3·/3+. Substitution
should therefore occur catalytically [eqns. (1), (2) and (3)].
We thank Mr T. Mahabiersing and Dr A. Whitwood for help
with the experiments and COST Action D14, project D14/
0001/19 for funding.
Notes and references
1 V. Balzani and F. Scandola, Supramolecular Photochemistry, Ellis
Horwood, Chichester, 1991.
2 C. J. Aspley, J. R. Lindsay Smith and R. N. Perutz, J. Chem. Soc.,
Dalton Trans., 1999, 2269.
3 R. V. Slone and J. T. Hupp, Inorg. Chem., 1997, 36, 5422.
4 R. V. Slone, K. D. Benkstien, S. Belanger, J. T Hupp, I. A. Guzei and
A. L. Rheingold, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1998, 171, 221.
5 J. L. Allwood, A. K. Burrell, D. L. Officer, S. M. Scott, K. Y. Wild and
K. C. Gordon, Chem. Commun., 2000, 747.
6 V. W. W. Yam, Chem. Commun., 2001, 789.
7 S. S. Sun, E. Robson, N. Dunwoody, A. S. Silva, I. M. Brinn and A. J.
Lees, Chem. Commun., 2000, 201.
8 G. J. Stor, F. Hartl, J. W. M. van Outersterp and D. J. Stufkens,
Organometallics, 1995, 14, 1115.
9 W. Kaim and S. Kohlmann, Inorg. Chem., 1990, 29, 2909.
10 J. W. M. van Outersterp, F. Hartl and D. J. Stufkens, Organometallics,
1995, 14, 3303.
11 L. Sacksteder, A. P. Zipp, E. A. Brown, J. Streich, J. N. Demas and B.
A. DeGraff, Inorg. Chem., 1990, 29, 4335.
12 F. P. A. Johnson, M. W. George, F. Hartl and J. J. Turner,
Organometallics, 1996, 15, 3374.
(1)
(2)
(3)
The labile nature of the axial ligand upon reduction explains
why the first reduction in the cyclic voltammogram is partly
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 950–951
951