be expected to show only low degrees of facial diastereo-
selectivity as a result of the near planarity of the tricyclic
system. Scho¨llkopf reported high diastereoselectivity for
alkylations of amino acid derived bislactim ethers.13 His
rationale for the observed selectivity was based on steric
effects due to ring substituents. It has also been suggested
that facial selectivity in related alkylations of lactam enolates
is directed either by stereoelectronic,14 torsional effects15 or
by solvation of the enolate counterion.16 Seebach also
suggested the role of adjacent nitrogen and R-carbon
pyramidalization on facial selectivity.14d
We initiated our desymmetrization studies with the DKP
derived from the less expensive (S) enantiomer of proline
rather than the (R) enantiomer as required for the natural
product. Low-temperature deprotonation of DKP 5 with 1
equiv of either LDA or KHMDS produced the monoenolate
(∼90%, as evidenced by quenching with MeOD). Trapping
of the monoenolates with a variety of electrophiles occurred
with high diastereoselectivity (dr 11-42:1, GC) in all cases
studied (Table 1). Unsurprisingly, potassium enolates were
found to be slightly more reactive than lithium enolates
(entries 2, 6, and 8 versus 3, 5, and 7). Treatment of the
potassium enolate of DKP 5 with benzylchloroformate
initially gave only a 48% yield of monobenzylester DKP
6c. This acylation was improved by slow, inverse addition
of the enolate to the electrophile, which presumably lowers
the possibility of competing deprotonation of the slightly
more acidic, monoacylated DKP product 6c. However,
neither inverse addition nor an increase in base employed
improved the yields of 3-azido DKP 6a.
Figure 1. Structures of oroidin and oroidin-derived marine
alkaloids.
is embedded in the phakellin/phakellstatin structure (Scheme
1). We, thus, sought to employ D-prolyl-D-proline anhydride
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis of Phakellstatin and
Phakellin
The stereochemical outcome of these electrophilic addi-
tions was determined by NOE and/or X-ray analysis. A key
NOE was observed for 3-methyl DKP 6d between the C6
hydrogen and the methyl group, confirming the cis arrange-
ment of these substituents (Figure 2a). Single-crystal X-ray
analysis of the crystalline benzyl DKP 6f confirmed the
relative stereochemistry of this alkylated DKP (Figure 2b).
The high degree of diastereoselectivity in these electrophilic
additions may be attributed to the slightly puckered nature
of the tricyclic system, in which the electrophile approaches
[(R,R)-cyclo(Pro,Pro)] (5)9 as an optically active starting
material and utilize a diastereoselective desymmetrization
process to functionalize this system. Subsequent oxidation
to a pyrrole, ring annulation, and guanidinylation would
deliver phakellin (1a) via phakellstatin (2a). While there are
reports of electrophilic additions to enolates derived from
diketopiperazines,10,11 there are relatively few examples of
functionalization of cyclo(Pro,Pro).12 At first inspection,
electrophilic addition to the enolate of cyclo(Pro,Pro) might
(11) For diastereoselective alkylations of related systems see: (a) Mart´ın-
Santamar´ıa, S.; Buenadicha, F. L.; Espada, M.; So¨llhuber, M.; Avendan˜o,
C. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 6424-6428. (b) Mart´ın-Santamar´ıa, S.; Espada,
M.; Avendan˜o, C. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 16795-16802.
(12) For alkylations of cyclo(Pro, Pro), see: (a) Schmidt, U. Nikiforov,
A. Monatsch. Chem. 1975, 106, 313-320. (b) Schmidt, U.; Poisel, H. Chem
Ber. 1973, 106, 3408-3420. (c) O¨ hler, E.; Poisel, H.; Tataruch, F.; Schmidt,
U. Chem. Ber. 1972, 105, 625-634. (d) Poisel, H.; Schmidt, U. Chem.
Ber. 1972, 105, 635-641.
(13) (a) Scho¨llkopf, U.; Tiller, T.; Bardengen, J. Tetrahedron 1988, 44,
5293-5305. (b) Rjappa, S.; Natekar, M. V. AdV. Het. Chem. 1993, 57,
187-289.
(14) (a) Groaning, M. D.; Meyers, A. I. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 9843-
9873 and references cited herein. (b) Meyers, A. I.; Seefeld, M. A.; Lefker,
B. A.; Blake, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 4565-4566. (c) Meyers,
A. I.; Seefeld, M. A.; Lefker, B. A.; Blake, J. F.; Willard, P. G. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 7429-7438. For studies on pyramidalization of
trigonal centers see: (d) Seebach, D.; Maetzke, T.; Petter, W.; Klotzer, B.;
Plattner, D. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 1781-1786. (e) Seebach, D.;
Juaristi, E.; Miller, D. D.; Schickli, C.; Weber, T. HelV. Chim. Acta 1987,
70, 237-261.
(9) Ishibashi, N.; Kouge, K.; Shinoda, I.; Kanehisa, H.; Okai, H. Agric.
Biol. Chem. 1988, 3, 819-827.
(10) For electrophilic additions to DKP enolates see (a) O¨ hler, E.;
Tataruch, F.; Schmidt, U. Chem. Ber. 1972, 105, 3658-3661. (b) Williams,
R. M.; Kwast, A. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 5787-5789. (c) Williams, R.
M.; Glinka, T.; Kwast, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5927-5929. (d)
Kishi, Y.; Fukuyama, T.; Nakatsuka, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 6490-
6492. (e) Kishi, Y.; Fukuyama, T.; Nakatsuka, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973,
95, 6492-6493. (f) Kishi, Y.; Fukuyama, T.; Nakatsuka, S.; Havel, M. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 6493-6495. (g) Williams, R. M.; Anderson, O.
P.; Armstrong, R. W.; Josey, J.; Meyers, H.; Eriksson, C. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1982, 104, 6092-6099.
(15) Ando, K.; Green, N. S.; Li, Y.; Houk, K. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999, 121, 5334-5335.
(16) Durkin, K. A.; Liotta, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 8162-
8163.
2646
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 16, 2002