combine to make this a difficult reaction. Despite these
limitations, the one-pot synthesis of a primary amine resulting
from the reaction between an organometallic compound and
an N-silylimine9 would eliminate several functional group
manipulations and protection/deprotection steps while pro-
viding the requisite aminomethylsilane (12) directly. To this
end, the silyllithium derivative was formed from chlo-
rodiphenylsilane 10 that was quenched with silylimine 11,
which was itself prepared in situ by treatment of isobutyral-
dehyde with lithium hexamethyldisilylamide (LHMDS).10
The preparation of any silanol typically requires that the
hydroxyl groups be masked or protected along the synthetic
route. Phenyl groups were selected for this purpose because
of their ability to assist in stabilizing the intermediate silyl
anion and the possibility of removing these groups at the
end with a strong acid.4
Benzoylation of 12 provides a representative amide moiety
on the left-hand side of the structure by substitution chemistry
(12a). This same transformation can be effected by using
condensation chemistry as well, thus broadening the synthetic
flexibility. Amide formation was followed by deprotection
of the methoxymethyl ether to provide 12b and PDC
oxidation of the resulting alcohol provided carboxylic acid
13 (Scheme 2). Condensation of 13 with diethylamine gave
the silanediol precursor 14.
lent yield (Scheme 3). Hydrolysis with potassium hydroxide
in iPrOH14 afforded the silanediol 16 in moderate yield
Scheme 3a
a Reagents and conditions: (a) BF3‚2AcOH, CH2Cl2, reflux (96%
yield). (b) KOH, iPrOH, rt (35% yield).
(35%), but provided the product cleanly. The balance of the
material in this transformation is simply returned difluoride.
We are continuing our efforts to further optimize this
deprotection.
In conclusion, a general and efficient method for the
synthesis of silanediol-based transition-state isosteres has
been developed. Noteworthy is the effective use of hydro-
silylation to install the carboxyl-containing portion of the
structure essentially intact and ready to diversify with a
variety of amines. The choice to utilize a nucleophilic silicon
species to effect Si-C bond formation on the amino side
accomplished a number of goals. It eliminates the need to
generate nonstabilized alkyl anions that are not only difficult
to create, but to control the reactivity due to their strong
basicity. Further, this approach allows for the one-pot
incorporation of a variety of amines via the corresponding
silylimine species. This strategy is currently being adapted
to a parallel synthesis format for the preparation of a variety
of silanediol peptidomimetics.
Scheme 2a
a Reagents and conditions: (a) PhCOCl, Et3N, CH2Cl2, rt (68%
yield). (b) HCl (cat.), MeOH, reflux (94% yield). (c) PDC, DMF,
rt (63% yield). (d) Et2NH, EDCI, CH2Cl2, 0 °C to rt (67% yield).
Acknowledgment. This work was funded by a research
grant from the Ontario Research and Development Challenge
Fund (ORDCF).
Supporting Information Available: Experimental pro-
cedures and spectral data for compounds 10, 12, 12a, 12b,
13, 14, 15, and 16. This material is available free of charge
The phenyl protecting groups can be removed with triflic
acid.4,11 However, low, irreproducible yields for this reaction
in our own hands encouraged us to seek an alternative
method to liberate the silanediol.12 Treatment of 14 with 50
equiv of BF3‚2AcOH13 provided difluorosilane 15 in excel-
OL026195S
(12) For Tamao oxidation, see: (a) Tamao, K.; Kakui, K.; Akita, M.;
Iwahara, T.; Kanatani, R.; Yoshida, J.; Kumada, M. Tetrahedron 1983, 39,
983-990. (b) Fleming, I.; Henning, R. R.; Parker, D. C.; Plaut, H. E.;
Sanderson, P. E. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1995, 317-337.
(13) Kno¨lker, H.-J.; Jones, P. G.; Wanzl, G. Synlett 1998, 613-616.
(14) Nakadaira, Y.; Oharu, K.; Sakurai, H. J. Organomet. Chem. 1986,
309, 247-256.
(9) Leboutet, L.; Courtois, G.; Miginiac, L. J. Organomet. Chem. 1991,
420, 155-161.
(10) Cainelli, G.; Giacomini, D.; Panunzio, M.; Martelli, G.; Spunta, G.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 5369-5372.
(11) (a) Uhlig, W. Chem. Ber. 1996, 129, 733-739. (b) Bassindale, A.
R.; Stout, T. J. Organomet. Chem. 1984, 271, C1-C3.
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 16, 2002
2685