August 2002
1033
Table 2. 1H-NMR Spectral Data of 2—9 in Pyridine-d5
No.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Aglycone
6
6.64 d (10.3)a)
5.92 d (10.3)
3.27 br d (10.4)
5.97 br d (8.8)
6.62 d (10.2)
5.91 d (10.2)
3.27 br d (10.5)
5.96 br d (8.8)
6.62 d (10.4)
5.91 d (10.4)
3.24 br d (10.5)
5.94 br d (9.0)
6.62 d (10.4)
5.91 d (10.4)
3.24 br d (10.5)
5.93 br d (8.8)
6.62 d (10.3)
5.91 d (10.3)
3.24 br d (10.7)
5.94 br d (8.8)
6.62 d (10.3)
5.91 d (10.3)
3.24 br d (10.7)
5.94 br d (8.8)
6.61 d (10.5)
5.90 d (10.5)
3.22 br d (10.7)
5.94 br d (8.8)
6.62 d (10.5)
5.91 d (10.5)
7
9
3.23 br d (10.2)
5.94 br d (8.6)
12
17
18
19
21
2.92 dd (10.2, 6.3) 2.92 dd (10.0, 6.6) 2.92 dd (10.0, 6.6) 2.91 dd (10.0, 6.6) 2.91 dd (10.5, 6.6) 2.91 dd (10.3, 6.6) 2.92 dd (10.0, 6.6) 2.92 dd (10.0, 6.8)
1.68 s
0.92 s
2.31 s
1.67 s
0.92 s
2.31 s
1.67 s
0.90 s
2.34 s
1.66 s
0.90 s
2.30 s
1.67 s
0.89 s
2.31 s
1.67 s
0.89 s
2.31 s
1.66 s
0.89 s
2.30 s
1.67 s
0.90 s
2.31 s
Sugar
Anomeric 4.98 br d (9.0)
5.01 br d (9.0)
4.88 d (7.8)
5.02 br d (9.3)
4.98 br d (9.5)
4.90 d (7.8)
5.03 br d (9.5)
4.98 br d (9.0)
4.73 d (7.6)
5.27 br d (9.3)
4.98 br d (9.3)
4.79 d (7.6)
5.10 d (7.8)
5.25 br d (9.3)
5.07 d (7.8)
5.25 br d (9.4)
5.14 d (7.8)
5.04 d (8.0)
5.01 br d (9.3)
4.71 d (7.6)
3.86 s
5.03 br d (9.8)
4.98 br d (9.0)
4.66 d (7.8)
4.97 br d (9.2)
4.71 d (7.6)
OMe
6-Me
3.35 s
3.42 s
3.50 s
3.49 s
3.87 s
3.96 s
3.51 s
3.91 s
3.88 s
3.50 s
3.52 s
3.53 s
3.50 s
3.50 s
3.49 s
1.38 d (6.1)
1.46 d (5.8)
1.56 d (5.8)
1.17 d (5.8)
1.55 d (5.9)
1.54 d (5.9)
1.18 d (5.9)
1.56 d (6.1)
1.49 d (6.1)
1.17 d (6.1)
1.71 d (6.1)
1.50 d (6.1)
1.18 d (6.1)
1.64 d (5.8)
1.52 d (6.1)
1.17 d (5.9)
1.64 d (5.8)
1.51 d (6.1)
1.17 d (5.9)
a) J values in Hz are given in parentheses.
ford compounds 2 (24 mg), 4 (18 mg) and 7 (185 mg).
We isolated a 17-epimer having an a-oriented side chain
of cynaphylloside G (8), that is, 12(R)-O-cinnamoyloxy-
3b,5b-dihydroxy-8,14-seco-17a-pregn-6-ene-8,14,20-trione.
However, this compound might be converted from 8 by keto–
enol interconversion of the side chain during the process of
extraction and isolation. There have been only two reports
of 8,14-seco-pregnane type of compounds from plant
sources.3,6)
The Et2O extract (59 g) was subjected to a column of silica gel using a
gradient system (EtOAc to 80% EtOAc in MeOH) affording six fractions.
Fraction 2 (1.6 g) was chromatographed on RP-18 columns (system VII),
followed by HPLC-ODS (system VIII) to provide compounds 5 (58 mg) and
6 (380 mg). Fraction 4 (4.0 g) was further purified by RP-18 (system IX),
HPLC-ODS (system VII) and HPLC-Diol (system X) to afford compounds
3 (18 mg) and 10 (45 mg).
Cynaphyllogenin (1): White amorphous powder, [a]D21 Ϫ115.8° (MeOH,
cϭ0.61), 1H- and 13C-NMR: Table 1, HR-FAB-MS (negative mode) m/z:
507.2379 (Calcd for C30H35O7, [MϪH]Ϫ 507.2382).
Cynaphylloside A (2): White amorphous powder, [a]D21 Ϫ63.9° (MeOH,
cϭ0.81), 1H-NMR: Table 2, 13C-NMR: Tables 3 and 4, HR-FAB-MS (nega-
tive mode) m/z: 651.3163 (Calcd for C37H47O10, [MϪH]Ϫ: 651.3169).
Cynaphylloside B (3): White amorphous powder, [a]D21 Ϫ63.8° (MeOH,
cϭ0.89), 1H-NMR: Table 2, 13C-NMR: Tables 3 and 4, HR-FAB-MS (nega-
tive mode) m/z: 813.3689 (Calcd for C43H57O15, [MϪH]Ϫ: 813.3697).
Cynaphylloside C (4): White amorphous powder, [a]D21 Ϫ42.4° (MeOH,
cϭ0.96), 1H-NMR: Table 2, 13C-NMR: Tables 3 and 4, HR-FAB-MS (nega-
tive mode) m/z: 957.4480 (Calcd for C50H69O18, [MϪH]Ϫ: 957.4483).
Cynaphylloside D (5): White amorphous powder, [a]D21 Ϫ38.2° (MeOH,
cϭ1.10), 1H-NMR: Table 2, 13C-NMR: Tables 3 and 4, HR-FAB-MS (nega-
tive mode) m/z: 955.4687 (Calcd for C51H71O17, [MϪH]Ϫ: 955.4691).
Cynaphylloside E (6): White amorphous powder, [a]D21 Ϫ61.2° (MeOH,
cϭ0.50), 1H-NMR: Table 2, 13C-NMR: Tables 3 and 4, HR-FAB-MS (nega-
tive mode) m/z: 941.4550 (Calcd for C50H69O17, [MϪH]Ϫ: 941.4534).
Cynaphylloside F (7): White amorphous powder, [a]D21 Ϫ53.9° (MeOH,
cϭ0.59), 1H-NMR: Table 2, 13C-NMR: Tables 3 and 4, HR-FAB-MS (nega-
tive mode) m/z: 1117.5243 (Calcd for C57H81O22, [MϪH]Ϫ: 1117.5219).
Cynaphylloside G (8): White amorphous powder, [a]D21 Ϫ52.6° (MeOH,
cϭ0.91), 1H-NMR: Table 2, 13C-NMR: Tables 3 and 4, HR-FAB-MS (nega-
tive mode) m/z: 1103.5058 (Calcd for C56H79O22, [MϪH]Ϫ: 1103.5062).
Cynaphylloside H (9): White amorphous powder, [a]D21 Ϫ56.1° (MeOH,
Experimental
General Procedure NMR spectra were recorded in C5D5N using a
JEOL JNM A-400 spectrometer (400 MHz for H-NMR and 100 MHz for
1
13C-NMR) with tetramethylsilane (TMS) as internal standard. MS were
recorded on a JEOL JMS-SX 102 spectrometer. Optical rotations were mea-
sured with a Union PM-1 digital polarimeter. Preparative HPLC was carried
out on columns of ODS (150ϫ20 mm i.d., YMC), Polyamine II (250ϫ20
mm i.d., YMC) and Diol (300ϫ8 mm i.d., YMC) with a Tosoh reflection
index (RI-8) detector. Medium pressure liquid chromatography (MPLC) was
carried out on a column of Polyamide C-200. For CC, silica gel G 60
(Merck), YMC-gel ODS (50 mm, YMC) and a highly porous copolymer of
styrene and divinylbenzene (Mitsubishi Chem. Ind. Co., Ltd.) were used.
The solvent systems were: (I) 60% MeOH, (II) EtOAc–MeOH (9 : 1), (III)
70% MeOH, (IV) 65% MeOH, (V) 90% MeCN, (VI) 92% MeCN, (VII)
50% MeCN, (VIII) 55% MeCN, (IX) 50% MeCN and (X) MeCN. The spray
reagent used for TLC was 10% H2S4O in 50% EtOH. Acid hydrolysis of
glycosides followed by identification of the resulting monosaccharides in-
cluding absolute configuration was carried out as previously described.5)
Plant Material The aerial parts of Cynanchum aphyllum were collected
in November 1998 from Ambalavao, Madagascar and identified by Dr. Ar-
mand Rakotozafy, Institut Malgache de Recherches Appliquees, Madagas-
car. A voucher specimen is kept in the Herbarium of the Institute of Pharma-
ceutical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Hiroshima University, Japan.
1
cϭ0.71); H-NMR: Table 2, 13C-NMR: Tables 3 and 4, HR-FAB-MS m/z:
1265.5580 (Calcd for C62H89O27, [MϪH]Ϫ: 1265.5591).
Extraction and Isolation The dried aerial parts (800 g) of C. aphyllum
were extracted with hot methanol. After removal of the solvent by evapora-
tion, the residue (166 g) was extracted with n-hexane and Et2O, successively.
The aqueous layer was subjected to a column of highly porous copolymer of
styrene and divinylbenzene, and successively eluted with H2O, 50% MeOH,
MeOH and acetone. The fraction eluted with MeOH (10.5 g) was subjected
to a column of RP-18 (system I) affording eight fractions. Fraction 5 (2.8 g)
was chromatographed on a column of silica gel (system II), followed by
HPLC-ODS (systems III and IV) to provide compounds 1 (18 mg), 8 (1.2 g)
and 9 (43 mg). Fraction 6 (2.3 g) was subjected to a column of MPLC-
Polyamide (system V), followed by HPLC-Polyamine II (system VI) to af-
Partial Acid Hydrolysis of 6 A solution of 6 (45.0 mg) in 2.0 ml of 1,4-
dioxane and 1.0 ml of 0.2 N H2SO4 was heated at 50 °C for 1 h. After 3.0 ml
of H2O was added the mixture was extracted with EtOAc. The EtOAc was
evaporated, followed by HPLC-ODS (60% MeOH) to provide 1 (14.0 mg)
and 2 (4.5 mg). The structures were confirmed by 1H- and 13C-NMR spectral
data.
Enzymatic Hydrolysis of 7—9 Cynaphyllosides F (7, 30 mg), G (8,
30 mg) and H (9, 15 mg) were dissolved in 0.5 ml of MeOH. A solution of
crude hesperidinase (100 mg in 20 ml of H2O) was added. After stirring at
37 °C for 1 week, the mixtures were extracted with EtOAc. The EtOAc was