Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
protecting groups to avoid (strongly) acidic, basic, oxidative, or
reductive conditions during global deprotection.
resulting enoate 10 failed despite close literature precedent,20
whereas the derived thiolester21 11 was compliant: on
treatment with MeMgBr in the presence of CuI (2 mol %)
and ligand 19 (2.4 mol %), adduct 12 was obtained in high
yield and excellent diastereoselectivity (>3 g scale).22 The
thioester group then streamlined the reduction to the
corresponding aldehyde 13,23 which was chain-extended to
give alkyne 14. Addition of 9-I-9-BBN followed by protolytic
cleavage of the C−B bond furnished alkenyl iodide 15
quantitatively.24,25 The derived organozinc reagent was
coupled to allylic chloride 7 with the aid of catalytic
Pd(0);26,27 the resulting lipophilic compound was deprotected
to render the purification more facile. This rewarding outcome
together with the fact that product 16 and the derived allylic
acetate 17 could be kept in a freezer for weeks made us
confident that a similar allyl/alkenyl cross-coupling reaction
would enable the projected late-stage fragment coupling.
For the synthesis of the central fragment, cheap 20 was
subjected to C-glycosylation with allyltrimethylsilane on
multigram scale8 and the resulting primary product was
elaborated into aldehyde 22 by standard protecting group
and oxidation state management (Scheme 4). When reacted
with allenylboronate 33 in the presence of catalytic (R)-3,3′-
dibromo-BINOL (32), the desired homopropargyl alcohol 23
was obtained as a single diastereomer (96%, 1 mmol
scale).28−30 Adjustment of the protecting groups then set the
stage for chain extension to be followed by the critical
spirocyclization event.
The spirotricyclic core of 1 resembles that of prorocentin
(2), yet another secondary metabolite derived from P. lima, of
which only the relative configuration is known;11 a closer look,
however, also reveals subtle but important stereochemical
differences. We recognized an opportunity to craft this
substructure, which features a double anomeric effect, via π-
acid catalysis.12,13 This allows the masked C18-carbonyl group
to be encoded as a triple bond, which, in turn, should facilitate
the build-up of the carbon skeleton from smaller subunits. The
homoallylic alcohol at C27 was deemed another privileged
assembly point, given the huge repertoire of known
asymmetric allylation reactions.14 This analysis traces 1 back
to three building blocks A−C of similar size and complexity
and leaves a certain flexibility with regard to the exact
implementation of the actual fragment coupling events.
In the forward sense, we were particularly keen on testing
the access to and stability of the side chain segment bearing the
unusual skipped array of methylene substituents. A two-
directional approach was chosen that builds upon the latent
symmetry of this sector (Scheme 3).15 Specifically, a Baylis−
a
Scheme 3
Of the different modules considered for this purpose,31
ketone 31 proved most adequate; it was readily prepared from
epichlorohydrin by copper-catalyzed ring opening with 35 and
relocation of the epoxide.32 Compound 29 was subjected to
iododesilylation,33 and the resulting oxirane 30 reacted with
lithiated ethyl vinyl ether34 and BF3·OEt2 as promotor to give
31 after acidic workup. Sonogashira coupling with 24 furnished
25.35 Exposure of this compound to the gold catalyst 34 and
cocatalytic PPTS entailed a remarkably clean spirocyclization
to give 26 as a single isomer in 65−78% yield (1.7 mmol
scale).36 On account of the carbophilic complex, ketal
formation occurred exclusively at the triple bond while leaving
the peripheral ketone untouched; as expected, the reaction was
accompanied by rearrangement of the exo-methylene group to
the endocyclic position.37 Selective cleavage of the terminal
olefin furnished keto-aldehyde 27 in readiness for fragment
coupling.
The third building block was derived from glucal 36, which
was transformed into the 2-deoxyglycoside 37 (Scheme 5).38
Upon activation with TMSOTf, 37 reacted with allyltrime-
thylsilane to give 38 with >10:1 selectivity in favor of the
required 2,6-trans-disubstitution. This favorable outcome is
thought to reflect a Curtin−Hammett situation, whereby
“inside attack” of the nucleophile to a 4H3 half-chair
oxocarbenium intermediate as shown in J is selectivity-
determining.39 After replacement of the acetyl groups by
TBS-ethers, compound 39 was subjected to cross-metathesis
with 3-buten-1-ol. Since both partners are “type I” olefins, this
transformation was far from trivial.19,40 Gratifyingly though,
the crossed product 40 could be obtained in 75% yield when
the tailored complex 4741 was used as catalyst and the
conversion was driven with excess 3-buten-1-ol.
a
Reagents and conditions: (a) (i) H2CCHCOOMe, DABCO; (ii)
Dibal-H, THF, 57%; (b) TBSCl, NaH, THF, 0 °C → rt, 87%; (c)
MsCl, Et3N, THF, 88%; (d) LiCl, THF, 40 °C, 98%; (e) H2C
CHMgBr, CuI (17 mol %), THF, −78 °C → 0 °C; (f) TBDPSCl,
imidazole, CH2Cl2, 81%; (g) Grubbs II, H2CCHCOOMe, CH2Cl2,
reflux, 86%; (h) TMS-SEt, AlCl3, THF, reflux, 86%; (i) MeMgBr,
CuBr·SMe2 (2 mol %), 19 (2.4 mol %), tBuOMe, −78 °C, 90% (dr
>20:1); (j) Et3SiH, Pd/C (5 mol %), CH2Cl2, 85%; (k) 18, K2CO3,
MeOH, 94%; (l) 9-I-9-BBN, hexane, then HOAc, quant.; (m) (i) Zn,
LiCl, THF, reflux; (ii) 17, Pd(PPh3)4 (5 mol %), THF; (iii) TBAF,
THF, 0 °C, 76% (over both steps); (n) Ac2O, pyridine, DMAP (10
mol %), 96%.
Hillman reaction of bromomethacrylate 4 with excess methyl
acrylate16 followed by instant reduction of 5 and mono-
silylation of the resulting diol paved the way to allylic chloride
7 in readiness for a first chain extension. The nucleophilic
partner was prepared by copper-catalyzed opening of
commercial 8 with vinylmagnesium bromide,17 protection of
the resulting alcohol, and cross metathesis of 918 with methyl
acrylate.19 The projected asymmetric 1,4-addition to the
While the elaboration of 41 into tosylate 46 was
straightforward, all attempts at reacting this product with
appropriate C-nucleophiles essentially met with failure. This
2465
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 2464−2469