Organic Letters
Letter
a
given conditions, though with somewhat lower yields (3t),
probably due to substantial steric hindrance. Remarkably, the
reaction proved to be regiospecific for silyl acetylene (3j) and
especially Mestranol (3s), as no traces of the undesired α-
isomer were observed in the corresponding NMR spectra.
Therefore, our method demonstrated its practical utility for the
late-stage hydrogermylation of natural compounds and
pharmaceuticals.
Aryl-substituted alkynes were also tested under the same
conditions (Figure 2), giving (E)-β-vinylgermanes as the major
products with good yields. Activated arylalkynes with electron-
donating or electron-withdrawing groups have higher selectiv-
ities for (E)-β isomers (3o and 3p), compared to nonactivated
phenyl acetylene (3n). However, overly strong electron-
withdrawing groups can decrease the selectivity (3r). Poor
selectivity was also observed for ethynyl naphthalene (3q).
We also investigated the reactivity of triphenylgermanium
hydride, Ph3GeH, under the studied conditions (Figure 2), but
unfortunately only moderate yields and a poor selectivity were
obtained with 1-decyne and phenyl acetylene (3u and 3v,
respectively). The reaction mechanism for Ph3GeH is probably
different from Bu3GeH, as the former is prone to form
radicals.20
Table 2. Mechanistic Studies
T
2a
3a
4a
entry
catalytic system
(°C)
solvent (%) (%) (%)
1
2
3
4
5
NaCo(CO)4 + PhCOOH
NaCo(CO)4 + tBuONa
Co2(CO)8 + PhCOOH
Ph3Si−Co(CO)4
85
100
60
100
100
DCE
toluene
DCE
toluene
toluene
9
5
9
15
8
82
3
91
68
66
0
2
0
2
1
Ph3Si−Co(CO)4 + MeOH
a
The reaction was performed on a 0.2 mmol scale. Yields were
determined by the H NMR integration of isolated mixtures against
1
an internal standard.
selectivity for the (E)-β-product in 1,2-dichloroethane
Murai,31,32 it is reasonable to speculate that NaCo(CO)4
generates HCo(CO)4 in situ from DCE by a SN2/β-hydride
elimination sequence.
To further probe the cobalt hydride mechanism, we
synthesized Ph3Si−Co(CO)4 for the subsequent alcoholysis
of the cobalt−silicon bond (to generate HCo(CO)4 in situ
according to a known procedure).33 We found that, in toluene,
the selectivity for the (E)-β isomer is significantly lower than
under the optimized conditions, but the selectivity is restored
upon the addition of MeOH to the mixture (Table 2, entries
4−5).
Radical pathways can be ruled out, since the direct visible-
light-induced generation of radicals from Co2(CO)8 proved to
be unselective (Table 1, entry 10). We can also conclude that
the studied reaction does not proceed via η1-vinylidene Co
complex; such a pathway would yield a mixture of (E/Z)-β
isomers,34 whereas for most Co2(CO)8-catalyzed reactions we
observed a mixture of α- and (E)-β-isomers with little to no
(Z)-β-product.
In summary, Co complexes were demonstrated for the first
time as viable catalysts of a hydrogermylation reaction,
enabling a selective and accessible protocol for the synthesis
of previously limited (E)-β-vinyl(trialkyl)germanes from
terminal alkynes and Bu3GeH. Tertiary, secondary, and most
importantly primary alkylacetylenes react well and with high
selectivities under the optimized conditions. Arylacetylenes are
also applicable under the reaction conditions. Obtained data
and mechanistic studies supported the syn-addition of Bu3GeH
to a π-alkyne complex and demonstrated the crucial role of
HCo(CO)4 in the catalytic cycle.
We would like to propose the following mechanism (Figure
3) for our (E)-β-selective hydrogermylation, which is based on
analogies found in the literature.27,28 The reaction between
Co2(CO)8 and Bu3GeH most likely generates cobalt
tetracarbonyl hydride, HCo(CO)4, and Bu3Ge−Co(CO)4
(analogous to that studied by Jeannin),29 and then both
cores can probably catalyze the hydrogermylation reaction
(albeit with different selectivities and efficiencies).
Just like the well-known hydroformylation, the cycles begin
with the thermally induced dissociation of the carbonyl CO
from original HCo(CO)4 A and Bu3Ge−Co(CO)4
F
complexes to generate active 16-electron species B and G,
respectively (Figure 3). Then, the addition of an alkyne
generates the corresponding π-complexes C and H. For the
HCo(CO)4 pathway, a hydride complex C easily undergoes
1,2-migratory insertion to form a new 16-electron alkenyl
tricarbonyl complex D. Then, complex D undergoes oxidative
addition with Bu3GeH to give a new 18-electron germylvinyl-
(tricarbonyl)cobalt E, which releases the desired alkene by
reductive elimination. It is quite probable that Bu3Ge−
Co(CO)4 F actively takes part in the studied reaction, since
higher amounts of Bu3GeH significantly change the reaction
In this pathway, a tributylgermyl group in H can undergo
migratory insertion to form a new 16-electron I. That new
species can undergo oxidative addition with another molecule
of Bu3GeH to give J, which then releases the product via
reductive elimination. An analogous hydrosilylation of ethylene
by Et3Si−Co(CO)4 was studied by Wrighton under photo-
chemical conditions.30
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
■
sı
* Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at
We conducted some experiments to obtain additional
support for the proposed mechanism (Table 2). The first
test was to study the susceptibility of the reaction to acids and
bases present in the reaction mixture, since we believe the key
intermediate is cobalt tetracarbonyl hydride, HCo(CO)4,
which is known to be acidic. While acids have little to no
effect on the reaction for both NaCo(CO)4 and Co2(CO)8
(Table 2, entries 1 and 3, respectively), strong bases like
tBuONa inhibit the reaction (Table 2, entry 2). It is worth
noting that NaCo(CO)4 demonstrated a much higher
Experimental details, additional experimental results,
characterization data, and NMR spectra (PDF)
AUTHOR INFORMATION
■
Corresponding Author
Neal P. Mankad − Department of Chemistry, University of
Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60607, United States;
3224
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 3221−3226