containing octane-1-thiol, piperidine and
L
-cysteine methyl
and peptides, and to the photoreversibility of the alkylation
process,9 supported o-QM could work as a photo-removable
linker of peptides, which can be mildly generated and stored.
Therefore our approach appears promising and general for the
preparation of further unsubstituted stable QMs on solid phase,
with applications both to organic synthesis, and as anchored
trapping agents of biological nucleophiles.
ester, were converted at room temperature, within few minutes,
into alkylated adducts grafted to resin (6a–6c, respectively).
Spectroscopic analysis, after filtration and drying of the
resulting resin under vacuum, disclosed the complete depletion
of the absorption band centered at 1718–1707 cm21 (see Fig.
1c), as well as the disappearance of the 13C-NMR signals due to
the TBDMS and the alkyl ammonium group (typical of resin 4).
New signals pertaining to the nucleophile moiety (alkylated by
supported o-QM), appeared in parallel.† Assignments were
unequivocally determined by comparisons with the 13C-NMR
signals of supported ammonium salt (4) and o-QM-alkylation
adducts (3a–3c), obtained from nucleophile alkylation proc-
esses involving 2 in solution.† The above evidence shows
clearly the efficiency of nucleophiles in trapping o-QM
supported on resin. Standard cleavage15 of resins 6a–6c,
afforded 3a–3c alkylation adducts with yields from 66% to
54%. The increased stability of o-QM on resin is truly
remarkable, since o-QM can only survive for a very short period
in solution; i.e. < 10 ms in water9 and < 1 s in organic non
nucleophilic solvents (in the latter case due to dimerization–
polymerization at rt),12 while supported o-QM can be safely
stored in a dry and cool place. On the other hand, SP does not
preclude the typical reactivity/selectivity of o-QM in solution
towards nitrogen and sulfur centered nucleophiles. In fact,
similarly to free o-QM in solution, which is highly selective
toward thiols, alkylation of cysteine methyl ester, o-QM on SP
(5) attacks selectively only the SH moiety, since no N-alkylation
adduct was detected. Our results, although preliminary, repre-
sent the first report of persistent o-QM on solid phase. THP-HM
resin succeeds in stabilizing the most reactive o-QM among all
known QMs and preserving it from dimerization–polymeriza-
tion and hydration processes. It is quite evident that undesired
intra-site reactions do not plague our solid phase synthesis.
Although site–site isolation does not per se guarantee stabiliza-
tion, since cross reactivity of highly reactive species on SP has
been reported,18 lack of proximity should play an important
role. The effective stabilization of o-QM on SP is also the result
of the protection from hydration, plausibly through p-stacking
interactions, in the hydrophobic environment of the resin bulk.
Due to the o-QM reactivity and selectivity towards amino acids
Notes and references
† Selected analytical data: 1: NMR (CDCl3) dH 0.23 (s, 6H), 1.00 (s, 9H),
3.31 (s, 9H), 4.70 (s, 2H), 4.74 (s, 2H), 6.91 (d, 1H, J = 9.5 Hz), 7.37 (dd,
1H, J = 1.5, 9.5 Hz), 7.80 (d, 1H, J = 1.5 Hz). dC 23.98, 18.25, 25.91,
53.26, 63.13, 64.56, 117.35, 119.03, 134.62, 135.58, 154.39, 153.67. Anal.
Calc. for C17H32INO2Si: C, 46.68, H, 7.37, I, 29.01, N, 3.20, O, 7.32, Si,
6.42. Found: C, 46.70, H, 7.39, I, 29.06, N, 3.18, Si, 6.47%. 4: dC 23.88,
18.30, 25.99, 52.93, 64.46, 65.77. Only dC of 1 aliphatic moiety on SP are
reported. 3a: NMR (CDCl3) dH 0.90 (t, 3H, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.20–1.38 (m,
10H), 1.56 (m, 2H), 2.43 (t, 2H, J = 7.0 Hz), 3.80 (s, 2H), 4.60 (s, 2H), 6.90
(d, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz), 7.09 (s, broad, 1H), 7.21 (d, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz), 7.29 (s,
1H). dC 14.00, 22.54, 28.63, 28.89, 29.01, 29.04, 30.87, 31.69, 32.78, 64.87,
117.17, 122.55, 128.05, 129.47, 132.83, 155.07. Anal. Calc. for C16H26O2S:
C, 64.04, H, 9.28, O, 11.33 S, 11.35. Found: C, 68.07, H, 9.35, S, 11.31%.
6a: dC 14.11, 22.60, 28.75, 29.10, 29.32, 29.85, 31.08, 31.74, 32.73, 65.77.
Only dC of 3a aliphatic moiety on SP are reported. 3b: NMR (CDCl3) dH
1.51 (bm, 2H), 1.64 (m, 4H), 2.52 (bm, 4H), 3.68 (s, 2H), 4.55 (s, 2H), 5.15
(bm, 1H), 6.80 (d, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz), 7.00 (s, 1H), 7.16 (d, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz).
dC 23.76, 25.60, 53.70, 61.89, 65.00, 115.82, 121.46, 127.38, 127.52,
131.19, 157.63. Anal. Calc. for C13H19NO2: C, 70.56, H, 8.65, N, 6.33, O,
14.46, S. Found: C, 70.58, H, 8.62, N, 6.39%. 6b: dC 23.68, 25.52., 53.57,
61.79, 65.50. Only dC of 3b aliphatic moiety on SP are reported. 3c: NMR
(CDCl3) dH 2.90 (m, 2H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 3.83 (m, 1H), 4.50 (s, 2H), 6.80 (d,
1H, J = 9.0 Hz), 7.09 (d, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz), 7.21 (s, 1H). dC 32.35, 34.15,
52.65, 64.75, 65.99, 117.33, 125.47, 128.14, 130.65, 135.01, 156.00,
171.50. Anal. Calc. for C12H17NO4S: C, 53.12, H, 6.32, N, 5.16, O, 23.59,
S, 11.82. Found: C, 53.22, H, 6.21, N, 5.19, S, 11.81%. 6c: 27.55, 29.57,
51.97, 62.30, 68.06. Only dC of 3c aliphatic moiety on SP are reported.
‡ The relative intensity of the carbonyl band displayed a detectable decrease
after 2 days. o-QM on SP kept under moisturised air displayed a detectable
weakening of the characteristic band (210%) after 10 h.
1 M. G. Peter, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1989, 28, 555 and references
cited therein; C. Di Valentin, M. Freccero, R. Zanaletti and M. Sarzi-
Amadè, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 8366.
2 G. Desimoni and G. Tacconi, Chem. Rev., 1975, 75, 651.
3 S. R. Angle, D. O. Arnaiz, J. P. Boyce, R. P. Frutos, M. S. Louie, H. L.
Mattson-Arnaiz, J. D. Rainier, K. D. Turnbull and W. Yang, J. Org.
Chem., 1994, 59, 6322.
4 D. Cabaret, S. A. Adediran, M. J. Garcia Gonzales, R. F. Pratt and M.
Wakselman, J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64, 713; J. K. Myers, J. D. Cohen and
T. S. Widlanski, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 11049.
5 Q. Zeng and S. E. Rokita, J. Org. Chem., 1996, 61, 9080.
6 K. D. Janda, L.-C. Lo, C.-H. L. Lo, M.-M. Sim, R. Wanf, C.-H. Wong
and L. A. Lerner, Science, 1997, 275, 945.
7 B. Chitkul, B. Atrash and M. Bradley, Tetrahedron Lett., 2001, 42,
6211; B. Atrash and M. Bradley, Chem. Commun., 1997, 1397.
8 D. Brousmiche and P. Wan, Chem. Commun., 1998, 491.
9 E. Modica, R. Zanaletti, M. Freccero and M. Mella, J. Org. Chem.,
2001, 66, 41; P. G. McCracken, J. L. Bolton and G. R. J. Thatcher, J.
Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 1820.
10 A. Vigalok and D. Milstein, Acc. Chem. Res., 2001, 34, 798; H. Amouri,
Y. Besace and J. Le Bras, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 6171.
11 P. Pande, J. Shearer, J. Yang, W. A. Greenberg and S. E. Rokita, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 6773.
12 M. Letulle, P. Guenot and J.-L. Ripoll, Tetrahedron Lett., 1991, 32,
2013; K. Chiba, T. Hirano, Y. Kitano and M. Tada, Chem. Commun.,
1999, 691.
13 C. Di Valentin, M. Freccero, M. Sarzi-Amadè and R. Zanaletti,
Tetrahedron, 2000, 56, 2547.
14 D. Craig, M. J. Robson and S. J. Shaw, Synlett, 1998, 1381.
15 D. A. Nugiel, L. A. M. Cornelius and J. W. Corbett, J. Org. Chem.,
1997, 62, 201.
16 L. A. Thompson and J. A. Ellman, Tetrahedron Lett., 1994, 50, 9333.
17 Gaussian 98, Revision A.7, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh PA, 1998.
Frequencies are unscaled.
Fig. 1 IR detection of the o-QM supported on solid phase (SP). a) Difference
IR spectrum of functionalized resins 5 and 4. b) Calculated B3LYP/
6-311+G(d,p) unscaled frequencies of 4-methyl-o-QM in gas phase. c)
Difference IR spectrum of functionalized resin 6b and 4, showing the
bleaching of IR absorption at 1722–1700 cm21, assigned to o-QM
supported on SP.
18 H. E. Blackwell, P. A. Clemons and S. L. Schreiber, Org. Lett., 2001, 8,
1185.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 1908–1909
1909