J. Le Gal et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 9295–9297
9297
label stability.12 After 12 h (two 99mTc periods), about
45% of 99mTc dissociated were observed for 99mTc-L2
while 99mTc-L1 exhibited a great stability (less than 3%
of 99mTc dissociated). The excellent behaviour for the
latter compound was confirmed by a serum stability
study. After 12 h of incubation in fresh human serum,
no significative technetium dissociation of the complex
was observed.
Hoyos, O. L.; Watkinson, M. New J. Chem. 2000, 24,
235–241.
7. Schneider, R. F.; Subramanian, G.; Feld, T. A.; McAfee,
J. G.; Zapf-longo, C.; Palladino, E.; Thomas, F. D. J.
Nucl. Med. 1984, 25, 223–229.
8. Bell, R. A.; Hughes, D. W.; Lock, C. J. L.; Valliant, J. F.
Can. J. Chem. 1996, 74, 1503–1511.
9. Noveron, J. C.; Olmstead, M. M.; Mascharak, P. K. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3242–3259.
10. Only selected data are cited below for L1a and L2 charac-
terisation: L1a: 13C{1H} NMR (50.32 MHz, CDCl3
JMOD) lC (ppm): 37.7 (SCH2), 48.6 (NCH2), 120.7
(CHAr), 124.3 (CHBz), 127.1, 129.9 (2CHAr), 131.2 (CAr),
132.3, 134.5 (4CHBz), 139.5 (CHAr), 141.3 (CBz), 152.9
(CAr), 172.8, 172.9 (2CO), 195.6 (COS). IR (KBr):
wNHCꢀO=1674 cm−1. m/z (DCI NH3): 345 (M+H+); L2:
13C{1H} NMR (50.32 MHz, CDCl3 JMOD) lC (ppm):
35.5 (SCH2), 43.7 (NCH2), 60.5, 67.9 (2C-S), 119.4
(CHAr), 120.4 (CAr), 123.6 (CHAr), 127.1, 127.2, 127.9,
128.3, 129.5, 129.6 (30CHTr), 131.2, 137.4 (2CHAr), 141.5
(CAr), 143.6, 143.9 (6CTr), 165.5, 168.4 (2CO). IR (KBr):
wNHCꢀO=1677 cm−1. m/z (DCI NH3): 741 (M+H+).
11. HPLC conditions: Satisfaction RP18AB column, eluent:
MeOH/H2O/TFA: 45/55/0.1; u=270 nm; Tr (99mTc-L1)=
9.40 min; Tr (99mTc-L2)=17.00 min. Electrophoresis of
each purified complex showed that both are negatively
charged complexes.
In conclusion, a simplified route has been developed for
the synthesis of two new tetradentate ligands. Their
corresponding 99mTc-complexes were achieved with a
good radiochemical yield. Serum stability and cysteine
challenge assay showed a great stability for one of the
two 99mTc-complexes, which makes it a promising chela-
tor of technetium. Biodistribution studies are currently
under progress.
References
1. (a) Parker, D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1990, 19, 271–291; (b)
Dilworth, J. R.; Parrot, S. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1998, 27,
43–55.
2. Benoist, E.; Fourteau, L.; Coulais, Y.; Dartiguenave, M.
J. labelled cpd. Radiopharm. 2001, 44, S521–S523.
3. Jurisson, S.; Lydon, J. D. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2205–
2218.
12. Cysteine challenge assay: In each case, an aliquot of a
fresh prepared solution of
L-cysteine at 1 mg/mL was
added to each purified complex, in a 500:1 cysteine/com-
plex molar ratio. Each solution was incubated at 20°C
and samples were removed for analysis. Metal dissocia-
tion was measured at various times from 2 to 12 h on a
LB 2832 linear analyser (Berthold) after thin layer chro-
matography on nano-sil C18 plates (Macherey-Nagel) by
elution with MeOH/CH3CN/H2O/TFA 20/15/65/0.1. Rf
(free technetium)=1; Rf (99mTc-L1)=0.5; Rf (99mTc-L2)=
0.25.
4. Fourteau, L.; Benoist, E.; Dartiguenave, M. Synlett 2001,
1, 126–128.
5. (a) De Sousa, A. S.; Croft, G. J. B.; Wagner, C. A.;
Mickael, J. P.; Hancock, R. D. Inorg. Chem. 1991, 30,
3525–3529; (b) De Sousa, A. S.; Hancock, R. D. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995, 415–416.
6. (a) Jackson, A. E.; Johnstone, R. A. W. Synthesis 1976,
685–686; (b) Bermejo, M. R.; Gonzalez, A. M.; Fondo,
M.; Garcia-Deibe, A.; Maneiro, M.; Sanmartin, J.;