boron p-orbital from conjugation relative to the borole compound 2
by coordinating the donor solvent to the boron atom.
To evaluate the electron-donating and -accepting properties,
cyclic voltammograms for compounds 1, 2, and 4 were recorded.
Compound 2 undergoes a reversible anodic oxidation. No oxidation
counterpart corresponding to the anodic peak was observed in spite
of the presence of the boryl unit. This observation is presumably
due to the fact that Lewis acidity in 2 no longer exists. Both
compounds 1 and 4 exhibited two sequential cathodic and the
corresponding anodic waves. The first half-wave oxidation poten-
tials (E1/2oxid) of 2 and 4 were almost the same irrespective of the
difference in the geometric configuration of the borole and borane,
being 0.44 V vs. Ag/Ag+. The oxidation potential is comparable to
or lower than that for the p-electron rich bithienyl complexes such
as bis(triarylamines) based on 3,3A-diphenyl-2,2A-bithiophene11 and
2,5-bis{4-[bis(4-methylphenyl)amino]phenyl}thiophene.12
In order to obtain the characteristic features of the electronic
structure, molecular orbital calculations of 2 were performed with
the B3LYP/3-21G*. The HOMO is delocalized over the p-
conjugated systems via the boron vacant p-orbital (Fig. 2). On the
other hand, the LUMO is localized on a boron with a dithienyl unit.
Examination of the HOMO and the LUMO of 2 indicates that
photoexcitation results in a net charge transfer from the conjugated
p-electron system to the borole ring.
Fig. 2 Representation of (a) HOMO and (b) LUMO of 2 based on the
B3LYP/3-21G* calculation.
Notes and references
† Experimental procedure for 2: To a stirred THF solution (30 mL) of 1
(0.95 g, 0.67 mmol) was added n-BuLi (1 ml of 1.6 M solution in hexane,
1.6 mmol) at 0 °C. The solution was warmed to room temperature and
continually stirred for 2 h at that temperature. The THF solution (5 mL) of
TipB(OMe)2 (0.22 g, 0.8 mmol) was slowly added to the solution at 0 °C
and then the mixture was warmed to room temperature. The solution was
stirred for 12 h. The product was extracted with methylene chloride and
washed with hexane (5 mL 3 3) to afford 2 in 71% yield. 1H NMR (CDCl3):
d 7.65 (d, 4H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.61 (d, 4H, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.49 (d, 4H, J = 8.4
Hz), 7.39 (d, 4H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.32–7.24 (m, 16H), 7.18 (d, 2H, J = 8.1 Hz),
7.15 (d, 2H, J = 4.8 Hz), 7.12 (d, 4H, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.08 (s, 2H), 6.91 (s, 2H),
2.87 (m, 2H), 2.65 (m, 1H), 1.42 (s, 24H), 1.24 (m, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR
(CDCl3): d 155.2, 153.6, 147.6, 147.1, 142.9, 130.9, 136.1, 134.6, 134.5,
128.2, 127.1, 126.7, 126.4, 126.2, 125.3, 124.5, 124.1, 123.7, 123.2, 122.8,
122.3, 122.0, 121.0, 120.5, 119.3, 118.4, 47.0, 35.8, 35.4, 34.2, 33.7, 27.3.
11B NMR: d 216.2. MS:m/z 1494 [M+].
‡ Experimental procedure for 4: Compound 4 was prepared using the same
procedure as that described for 2. 1H NMR (CDCl3): d 7.68 (d, 4H, J = 7.5
Hz), 7.64 (d, 4H, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.52 (d, 4H, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.42 (d, 4H, J =
7.2 Hz), 7.35–7.25 (m, 10H), 7.23–7.14 (m, 16H), 7.04 (d, 2H, J = 4.2 Hz),
6.95 (s, 2H), 2.91 (m, 2H), 2.70 (m, 1H), 1.45 (s, 24H), 1.30 (m, 18H).
13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3): d 155.2, 153.6, 147.6, 147.1, 143.1, 130.9, 137.7,
135.9, 134.5, 128.8, 128.2, 127.8, 127.4, 127.1, 126.7, 126.3, 125.3, 124.8,
124.1, 123.7, 123.2, 122.9, 122.3, 120.9, 120.6, 119.7, 119.4, 119.1, 46.9,
35.2, 34.8, 34.0, 33.6, 27.1. 11B NMR: d 28.6. MS: m/z 1496 [M+].
In summary, we have disclosed the synthesis of a fully
conjugated electron-rich borole. The perturbation of the p-electron
systems by introducing amine and boryl moieties influences the
photophysical properties and Lewis acidity. The extremely upfield
shift of the resonance in the 11B NMR spectrum of 2 may be
attributable to the charge donation from the p-electron systems to
the boron atom. This intrinsic property should be considered in the
design of compounds targeted for specific applications.
We are grateful to BK21(2003) for generous financial support.
Table 1 Photophysical and electrochemical data of 2 and 4
First oxidation
Com-
pound
Absorption
(lmax/nm)
Fluorescencea potential/V
(lmax/nm)
Solvent
vs. Ag/Ag+b
1 J. J. Eisch, B. Shafii, J. D. Odom and A. L. Rheingold, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1990, 112, 1847.
2 Y. Sugihara, T. Yagi, I. Murata and A. Imamura, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1992, 114, 1479.
3 J. J. Eisch, J. E. Galle and S. Kozima, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1986, 108, 379;
R. J. Wehmschulte, A. A. Diaz and M. A. Khan, Organometallics, 2003,
22, 83.
4 P. A. Chase, W. E. Piers and B. O. Patrick, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000,
122, 12911.
5 S. Yamaguchi, T. Shirasaka, S. Akiyama and K. Tamao, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2002, 124, 8816.
6 Y. Shirota, M. Kinoshita, T. Noda, K. Okumoto and T. Ohara, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 11021.
2
4
DMF
THF
Hexane
DMF
THF
369, 438
370, 436
370, 433
376
541
534
438, 518
511
481
0.45
0.43
375
Hexane
373
440, 463
a Excited at the longest absorption maximum wavelengths. b Peak potential
measured on a 1 mM solution in dichloromethane containing 100 mM of
TBAP using Pt electrode and Pt plate as working and counter electrodes at
a scan rate of 20 mV s21
.
7 C. Branger, M. Lequan, R. M. Lequan, M. Barzoukas and A. Fort, J.
Mater. Chem., 1996, 6, 555; Z. Yuan, N. J. Taylor, T. B. Marder, I. D.
Williams, S. K. Kurtz and L.-T. Cheng, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.,
1990, 1489.
8 R. J.-P. Corriu, T. Deforth, W. E. Douglas, G. Guerrero and W. S.
Siebert, Chem. Commun., 1998, 963.
9 S. Yamaguchi, S. Akiyama and K. Tamao, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001,
123, 11372.
10 N. Matsumi, M. Miyata and Y. Chujo, Macromolecules, 1999, 32,
4467.
11 K.-T. Wong, T. H. Hung, S. C. Kao, C. H. Chou and Y. O. Su, Chem.
Commun., 2001, 1628.
Fig. 1 Photograph of 2 and 4 solutions under UV irradiation (365 nm). From
left to right: 2, 4 in DMF, 2, 4 in THF, 2, 4 in hexane (ca. 1026 M).
12 T. Noda, H. Ogawa, N. Noma and Y. Shirota, J. Mater. Chem., 1999, 9,
2177.
C h e m . C o m m u n . , 2 0 0 4 , 6 8 – 6 9
69