Organic Letters
Letter
difluoro-β-ketosulfones, but this method generally suffers from
the monofluorinated products along with low yields of
difluorinated products and limited substrate scope.14 In
2009, Hu et al. reported nucleophilic fluoroalkylation of esters
to synthesize fluorinated β-ketosulfones.15 In 2020, Wu et al.
reported a photocatalyzed three-component sulfonylation of
aryldiazonium tetrafluoroborates with sodium metabisulfite
and 2,2-difluoro enol silyl ethers.16 Owing to the harsh
conditions and the poor accessibility of starting materials, these
approaches are confronted with limited functional group
tolerance (Figure 1b).
Based on a serendipitous discovery, we found a 1,3-sulfonyl
migration (from oxygen to carbon) of difluorovinyl sulfonates
to α,α-difluoro-β-ketosulfones initiated by a catalytic amount
of AgF (Figure 1c). Advantages of this method include high
atom-economy, broad substrate scope, excellent yields, and
mild reaction conditions. Notably, this method can be applied
to the facile preparation of derivatives of natural products and
bioactive compounds, which are challenging for the reported
methods.14−16
Our study began by evaluating the intramolecular migration
of 1a. As for the synthesis of the starting material 1a, there are
two reported methods to achieve it. One way is initiated from
commercially available benzaldehyde, treated with the
trifluoromethylation of aldehyde, sulfonylation of benzyl
alcohol and HF elimination under basic conditions to generate
1a.17 The alternative pathway to form 1a is the palladium-
catalyzed cross-coupling reaction between iodobenzene and
2,2-difluoro-1-(tributylstannyl)vinyl 4-methylbenzenesulfo-
nate.18 After screening with different fluoride sources, we
found that the corresponding product α,α-difluoro-β-ketosul-
fone (2a) could be isolated in an excellent yield (93% yield)
under the condition using AgF (10 mol %) as a reaction
promotor, MeCN as solvent at 60 °C (Table 1, entry 1). The
structure of 2a was confirmed by X-ray crystallography. Using
other fluoride sources such as CsF and KF resulted in lower
yields, and after 20 h part of the starting material (1a) was
recovered (entries 2 and 3). In addition, the use of LiF and
CuF2 afforded none of the desired product (entries 4 and 5).
Different solvents were tested, and we found that acetone,
DMF, and DMA led to slightly decreased yields (entries 7−9).
Replacing MeCN with DMSO led to a significantly decreased
yield of 2a (entry 10). The reaction carried out in DCE or
H2O did not work, and the starting material (1a) was
recovered (entries 11 and 12). Further investigation of the
reaction temperature indicated that half of 1a remained
unreacted after 20 h when decreasing the temperature to 40
°C (entry 13), while increasing the temperature to 80 °C
caused a slight decrease in the yield (entry 14). Control
experiments indicated AgF is essential for this transformation
(entry 15).
After establishing the optimized reaction conditions, we
turned to evaluate the substrate scope of this transformation.
Various substituted sulfonyl (Ar1 group) difluorostyrenes were
transformed smoothly. As shown in Scheme 1, the
difluorovinyl sulfones bearing a phenyl or an alkylbenzene
group afforded the sulfonyl migration products in excellent
yields (2b−2e). However, a lower yield was obtained for 2f
with a methyl group at the ortho position, which might be
caused by the hindrance effect. Naphthalene and biphenyl
derivatives delivered the desired products (2g−2i) in 80−96%
yields. Notably, the halide (fluoride, chloride, bromide, and
iodide) substituted substrates all led to clean formation of the
corresponding products in high yields (2j−2n, 73−98%).
Examination of electron-deficient substrates revealed that
ketone and ester moieties could be tolerated (2o−2p). In
addition, MeO- and Me2N-substituted difluorovinyl sulfones
(2q−2s) were obtained in 52−91% yields under the standard
conditions, and the substrate utilizing dihydrobenzofuran as a
substituent produced 2t in 90% yield.
a
Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditions
Next, we studied the influence of the substitution of Ar2
group. Excellent yields were obtained when substrates
contained alkyl groups (2u−2w) as well as naphthalene and
biphenyl derivatives (2x−2y). Electron-rich substrates such as
difluorovinyl sulfones bearing a MeO, EtO, PhO, or morpho-
line group were found to be highly effective in this protocol
(2z−2ac). In addition, substrates (1ad−1ae) with an OTs or
OCF3 group were also well-tolerated. We then tested the
compatibility with unprotected phenol groups and obtained
2af in 77% yield. Interestingly, the ability to tolerate a diverse
set of aryl halides (2ag−2aj) left enough room for subsequent
manipulation. The presence of electron-poor groups also
appeared to be suitable substrate in this reaction (2ak−2ao),
although the CN group seemed less effective (2am).
Furthermore, we turned our attention to investigate the
scope of substrates with a range of heterocycles, and high
yields were obtained for the derivatives containing indole,
quinoline, and thiophene moieties (2ap−2at).
Encouraged by these results, we intended to extend this
approach to small complex molecules containing natural
products or druglike scaffolds. L-(−)-Menthol derivative
worked efficiently, giving 2au in 80% yield. Substrates derived
from amino acids such as L-phenylalanine and D-proline could
be transformed with high efficiency in this protocol (2av−
2ax). The utility of the method was also demonstrated by a
late-stage functionalization of tocopherol, fructose, and
pregnenolone derivatives (2ay−2aaa) in good yields. These
b
b
deviation from the standard
conditions
yield of 2a
recovery for 1a
entry
(%)
(%)
c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
none
CsF instead of AgF
KF instead of AgF
96 (93)
nd
46
29
94
95
nd
nd
nd
nd
11
99
97
50
nd
98
42
65
0
LiF instead of AgF
CuF2 instead of AgF
NMP instead of MeCN
acetone instead of MeCN
DMF instead of MeCN
DMA instead of MeCN
DMSO instead of MeCN
DCE instead of MeCN
H2O instead of MeCN
40 °C instead of 60 °C
80 °C instead of 60 °C
no AgF
0
93
94
89
90
73
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
0
43
91
0
a
Reaction conditions: 1a (62.0 mg, 0.2 mmol), AgF (2.5 mg, 10 mol
b
%), MeCN (0.5 mL), 60 °C, 20 h. Yields were determined by 19F
NMR analysis using benzotrifluoride as the internal standard.
c
Isolated yield in the parentheses.
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX