Marshall et al.
cell lines), studies on bullatacin2, asimin, and several
analogues4 indicate that they exhibit only modest growth
inhibition of normal cells. Hence the differential cyto-
toxicity is quite high. Preliminary investigations have
shown that acetogenins selectively inhibit ATP synthesis
in tumor cells but not in noncancerous cells. This mode
of action is unique and offers a previously unexplored
mechanism for cancer chemotherapy.
Ba ck gr ou n d
Numerous publications on the synthesis of Annona-
ceous acetogenins and their possible precursors have
appeared in recent years.5-8 The sequences developed in
those investigations provided adequate amounts of the
final products for structure confirmation, but few, if any,
could be judged both efficient and versatile. Motivated
by the reported high levels of activity against human
tumor cell lines and low toxicity toward normal cells, we
initiated a program to develop a modular synthetic
approach that could be used to prepare the most active
naturally occurring structural types and analogues thereof
for structure-activity evaluation.
F IGURE 2. Core tetrahydrofuran assembly.
hydroxyl substituents at C30, C10, and C4 as a test of
concept. Natural acetogenins with these features have
been found to strongly inhibit the growth of human colon,
breast, and lung cancer cells.3 The high convergency and
modular nature of the synthetic plan would provide more
efficient access to these bioactive compounds, and non-
natural analogues thereof, than previous more linear
routes. Following the attainment of these initial synthetic
goals we would be well-positioned to interchange the
various modules to produce unnatural acetogenins with
the potential for improved drug properties.
The central element of our plan entails the synthesis
of four major segments consisting of two pairs of allylic
stannanes, equivalent to the aliphatic termini A and B,
and the spacer units D and E (Figure 3). These would
be joined sequentially to the dialdehyde precursor C by
the aforementioned allylation methodology to assemble
stereochemically homogeneous core precursors, which
would then be cyclized to the bistetrahydrofuran core
units. Sonogashira coupling9 of the butenolide termini F
or G would provide the fully elaborated acetogenin
structures. The syntheses would be completed by hydro-
genation of the side chain multiple bonds and deprotec-
tion of the OH functions.
Syn th etic P la n
Our plan was based on previous success in constructing
the bistetrahydrofuran core structure through stereose-
lective additions of enantiomerically enriched γ-alkoxy
allylic stannanes, or the related allylic indium halide
analogues, to enantioenriched γ-silyloxy aldehydes, fol-
lowed by tetrahydrofuran ring closure of sulfonic ester
derivatives of the adducts (Figure 2).5,6 The allylation
methodology provides a versatile route to either enanti-
omer of the syn or anti diastereomeric adduct. Addition-
ally it is possible to prepare enantiomeric and diastere-
omeric γ-silyloxy aldehyde substrates, thereby allowing
reasonably direct access to any of the 64 possible bistet-
rahydrofuran core isomers. Of course, the efficiency of
this approach would expectedly show some dependence
on stereochemistry such that all isomers might not be
equally accessible.
The initial goals of the present investigation were to
develop a modular route to representative adjacent
bistetrahydrofuran Annonaceous acetogenins with the
threo, trans, threo, trans, threo core stereochemistry and
We selected asiminocin, asimin, and asimicin as the
initial synthetic targets. These acetogenins have been
reported to exhibit inhibitory activities of ∼10-12 µg/mL
against HT-29 human colon cancer cell lines.3
(4) Valeriote, F. Unpublished results.
(5) (a) Marshall, J . A.; Hinkle, K. W. J . Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 4247.
(b) Marshall, J . A.; Hinkle, K. W. J . Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 5989. (c)
Marshall, J . A.; Chen, M. J . Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 5996.
(6) (a) Marshall, J . A.; Hinkle, K. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39,
1303. (b) Marshall, J . A.; J iang, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 1493.
(c) Marshall, J . A.; J iang, H. J . Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 7066. (d) Marshall,
J . A.; J iang, H. J . Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 971. (e) Marshall, J . A.; J iang,
H. J . Nat. Prod. 1999, 62, 1123.
Segm en t Syn th esis
Our synthesis of the aliphatic terminus A of asiminocin
is depicted in Scheme 1. The known ester aldehyde 210
was treated with dibutylzinc in the presence of the
bissulfonamide catalyst 3 by the Knochel protocol11 to
afford the alcohol 4 as a 95:5 mixture (Mosher ester
analysis)12 of enantiomers in high yield. Sequential
reduction and oxidation of the DPS protected derivative
5 yielded the enal 7, which was subjected to a stannation-
(7) Reviews: (a) Figade´re, B. Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 28, 359. (b)
Hoppe R.; Scharf, H.-D. Synthesis 1995, 1447. (c) Marshall, J . A.;
Hinkle, K. W.; Hagedorn, C. E. Isr. J . Chem. 1997, 37, 97. (d) Casiraghi,
G.; Zanardi, F.; Battistina, L.; Rassu, G.; Appendino, G. Chemtracts:
Org. Chem. 1998, 11, 803.
(8) (a) Hoye, T. R.; Hanson, P. R.; Kovelesky, A. C.; Ocain, T. D.;
Zhuang, Z. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 9369. (b) Naito, H.; Kawahara,
E.; Maruta, K.; Maeda, M.; Sasaki, S. J . Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 4419.
(c). Sinha, S.; Sinha, A.; Yazbak, A.; Keinan, E. J . Org. Chem. 1996,
61, 7640. (d) Hoye, T. R.; Ye, Z. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1801. (e)
Sinha, S. C.; Sinha, A.; Keinan, E. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 12014
and references therein. (f) Emde, U.; Koert, U. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999,
40, 5979. (g) Avedissian, H.; Sinha, S. C.; Yazbak, A.; Sinha, A.; Neogi,
P.; Sinha, S. C.; Keinan, E. J . Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 6035.
(9) Sonogashira, K.; Tohda, Y.; Hagihara, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975,
4467.
1772 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 68, No. 5, 2003