nitrogen atmosphere. However, they underwent decomposition
upon irradiation in the presence of air.
presence of pyrrole rings resulted in a red shift of the
emission.
A pyrrole moiety can also be introduced into the oligoaryl
system when imine was employed as an electrophile. Thus, the
reaction of diimine 9a with 3d at 278 °C followed by treatment
with BF3·OEt2 afforded 13 in 47% yield.
Incorporation of double and/or triple bonds into this oligoaryl
system is also feasible by combining Heck10 or Sonogashira11
reaction with the furan annulation protocol. Thus, Heck reaction
(10 mol% Pd(OAc)2, 15 mol% Ph3P and K2CO3 in CH3CN, 48
h) of the divinylpentaaryl 12a with excess 4b afforded 14 in
72% yield. In a manner similar to that described above,
annulation of 14 with 3b gave 16 in 62% yield.
Treatment of 11a with 4b under Sonogashira conditions (5
mol% of PdCl2(PPh3)2 10 mol% of CuI and Et3N in acetonitrile)
gave 78% yield of dialdehyde 15. Annulation of 15 with 3c
under our usual conditions yielded 17 (45%). Similarly, 18 was
obtained in 48% yield from the reaction of 15 with 3b. Since
16–18 contain double or triple bonds at the terminal phenyl
rings, further transformation by repeating the same procedures
would lead to higher homologues.
In summary, we have demonstrated a new route for the
synthesis of a variety of alternating benzene–furan oligoaryls up
to 5 nm in length. Further extension by using the same strategy
will be feasible leading to the synthesis of molecular wires of
well-defined conjugation lengths.
We thank the Ministry of Education and the National Science
Council of the Republic of China for financial support.
Notes and references
Electrochemical studies showed that teraryl 5 exhibited a
reversible one-electron redox process whereas pentamer 6a
showed a reversible two-electron redox process. Slight decom-
position was observed when 6b and 6c were subjected to two-
electron oxidation. The first oxidation potentials for oligoaryls
are summarized in Table 1. As expected, the first oxidation
potential of the oligoaryls decreases with increasing conjuga-
tion length. Relatively speaking, substrates containing double or
triple bonds (e.g. 14–18) were less stable towards electro-
chemical oxidation. The absorption, fluorescence data and
fluorescent quantum yields are also provided in Table 1. As
expected, lmax and lem increase with the increasing conjugation
length and reach saturation at the nonamer (6b) stage. The
‡ All new compounds gave satisfactory spectroscopic and analytical data.
The details are described in the ESI.†
1 (a) Electronic Materials: The Oligomer Approach, ed. K. Müllen and G.
Wegner, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1998; (b) J. M. Tour, Acc. Chem.
Res., 2000, 33, 791.
2 For a review see: A. Gandini and M. N. Belgacem, Prog. Polym. Sci.,
1997, 22, 1203 and references therein.
3 H. Saadeh, T. Goodson, III and L. Yu, Macromolecules, 1997, 30,
4608.
4 (a) R. E. Niziurski-Mann and M. P. Cava, Adv. Mater., 1993, 5, 547; (b)
R. E. Niziurski-Mann, C. Scordilis-Kelley, T.-L. Liu, M. P. Cava and R.
T. Carlin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 887; (c) A. Hucke and M. P.
Cava, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 7413; (d) J. K. Politis, J. C. Nemes and
M. D. Curtis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 2537; (e) S. M. Pyo, S. I.
Kim, T. J. Shim, H. K. Park and M. Ree, Macromolecules, 1998, 31,
4777.
Table 1 Photophysical and electrochemical properties of oligoaryls.
Compd.
E1/2a/eV
lmaxb/nm
lemb/nm
Ff
5 G. Dufresne, J. Bouchard, M. Belletete, G. Durocher and M. Leclerc,
Macromolecules, 2000, 33, 8252.
5
6a
6b
6c
13
14
15
16
17
18
0.92
0.57
0.31
0.20
0.41
0.37
0.40
0.18
0.33
0.28
364
398
418
422
361, 395
344, 407
348, 409
422
397
402
402, 423
454, 482
474, 480
474, 499
451, 485, 523
484
494
497
491
494
0.74
0.74
0.53
0.42
0.79
0.58
0.59
0.73
0.48
0.63
6 C.-F. Lee, L.-M. Yang, T.-Y. Hwu, A.-S. Feng, J.-C. Tseng and T.-Y.
Luh, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 4992.
7 L.-Z. Zhang, C.-W. Chen, C.-F. Lee, C.-C. Wu and T.-Y. Luh, Chem.
Commun., 2002, 2336.
8 (a) H. Ikehira, S. Tanimoto and T. Oida, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans 1,
1984, 1223; (b) A. Krief, B. Kenda and P. Barbeaux, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1991, 32, 2509.
9 A. Boudier, L. O. Bromm, M. Lotz and P. Knochel, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2000, 39, 4414.
10 A. de Meijere and S. Bräse, J. Organomet. Chem., 1999, 576, 88.
11 K. Sonogashira, Metal-Catalyzed Cross-coupling Reactions, ed. F.
Diederich and P. J. Stang, Wiley-VCH, Weiheim, Germany, 1998, pp.
203–229.
a The first oxidation potential vs. ferrocene/ferrocenium ion. b Measured in
CHCl3 solution.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 2824–2825
2825