618
receptors (Maitre et al. 1990; Snead 1996) and was in the
Notably, SCH 50911appeared more potent than CGP
present study administered (100 mg/kg, i.v.) at a dose twice 35348 in antagonising the electrophysiological actions of
as high as that required to fully antagonise behavioural ef- GHBA or baclofen of nigral DA neurons. Thus, pretreat-
fects of GHBA (Colombo et al. 1995). NCS-382 was not ment with SCH 50911 (75 mg/kg, i.v.) almost totally pre-
able to antagonise the decrease in firing rate as produced by vented the inhibition of firing rate induced by baclofen.
GHBA, nor the GHBA-induced reduction in burst firing. When rats were pretreated with CGP 35348 (200 mg/kg,
Furthermore, the baclofen-induced alterations in the neu- i.v.), baclofen given in high doses (32 mg/kg, i.v.) still pro-
ronal activity of nigral DA neurons, i.e. reduction in firing duced about 60% inhibition of firing rate (Engberg et al.
rate, variation coefficient of ISHs and burst firing, was not 1993).This difference in potency between the two GABAB-
influenced by pretreatment with NCS-382. Among all elec- receptor antagonists is also in agreement with previous in
trophysiological parameters measured on nigral DA neu- vivo studies comparing their ability to antagonise inhibition
rons, the only significant effect observed with NCS-382 of the antitussive or the respiratory depressant effect of
was a slight antagonism of the decrease in variation coeffi- baclofen (Bolser et al. 1995).
cient of ISHs following doses of 100 mg/kg or less of
Altogether, the results of the present study clearly show
GHBA. This action of NCS-382 is obscure and cannot eas- that GHBA and the GABAB-receptor agonist baclofen sim-
ily be explained in terms of GHBA- or GABAB-receptor ilarly produce their actions on the firing rate and burst ac-
mechanisms.
tivity of nigral DA neurons by specifically inhibiting nigral
In all, our results show that GHBA affects DA neuronal DA neuronal activity via activation of GABAB receptors.
activity via activation of GABAB receptors. A stumbling
Acknowledgements This study was supported by the Swedish Med-
ical Research Council (no. 7484), Åhlén-stiftelsen, Loo och Hans
block with this idea is the lack of reliable binding data
showing high affinity of GHBA to GABAB-receptor sites.
Ostermans stiftelse, and the Karolinska Institute. The expert technical
Rather, some studies show a lack of affinity of GHBA to
assistance of Ms. Carolina Hurtado is gratefully acknowledged.
GABAB-receptor sites (Benavides et al. 1982; Snead and
Liu 1984; see Maitre 1997). One may suggest that GHBA
could influence the neuronal DA activity indirectly, e.g. by
References
increasing concentrations of GABA, either by a formation
of GABA from GHBA or, less likely though, via a release
of the transmitter (see Maitre1997). If so, however, then
GABAA receptors, in addition to GABAB receptors, should
be indirectly affected by GHBA. Previous studies have
shown that systemic administration of muscimol, a specific
GABAA-receptor agonist, is associated with effects on neu-
ronal DA activity opposite to those produced by GHBA (i.e.
increased firing rate and burst activity), making this hy-
pothesis less attractive. Furthermore, whereas the actions of
GHBA on neuronal DA activity are almost instantaneous in
onset, no convincing picture from previous studies has
emerged that central endogenous levels of GABA are im-
mediately increased; whereas several studies fail to show
increased GABA concentration following GHBA adminis-
tration (Mitoma and Neubauer 1968; Margolis 1969;
Doherty et al. 1975; Möhler et al. 1976; Doherty et al.
1978), others report a slight GABA increase, however,
more than 60 min after injection of GHBA (Della Pietra et
al. 1966; De Feudis and Collier 1970). In addition, a puta-
tive releasing action of GABA by GHBA as induced via
GHBA sites is unlikely to occur since such an effect would
be blocked by NCS. Consequently, an indirect action of
GHBA in affecting neuronal DA activity appears unlikely
judging from our results. Rather, a direct action on recep-
tors sensitive to GHBA, i.e. GABAB receptors, is likely to
account for the effects of GHBA in this regard. Such a
mode of action of the drug on central mechanisms is also
strongly supported by biochemical and behavioural data
(Nissbrandt and Engberg 1996), where the GABAB-recep-
tor antagonist CGP 35348 was shown to antagonise the
similar action of GHBA and baclofen on striatal DA release
and locomotor activity, respectively.
Benavides J, Rumigny JF, Bourguignon JJ, Cash C, Wermuth C, Man-
del P, Vincendon G, Maitre M (1982) High affinity binding sites
for γ-hydroxybutyric acid in rat brain. Life Sci 30:953–961
Bernasconi R, Lauber J, Marescaux C, Vergnes M, Martin P, Rubio V,
Leonhardt T, Reymann N, Bittiger H (1992) Experimental ab-
sence seizures: potential role of γ-hydroxybutyric acid and
GABAB receptors. J Neural Transm Suppl 35:155–177
Bolser DC, Blythin DJ, Chapman RW, Egan RW, Hey JA, Rizzo C,
Kuo S-C, Kreutner W (1995) The pharmacology of SCH 50911: a
novel, orally active GABAB receptor antagonist. J Pharmacol Exp
Ther 274:1393–1398
Colombo G, Agabio R, Bourguignon J, Fadda F, Lobina C, Maitre M,
Reali R, Schmitt M, Gessa GL (1995) Blockade of the discrimina-
tive stimulus effects of γ-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) by the GHB
receptor antagonist NCS-382. Physiol Behav 58:587–590
De Feudis FV, Collier B (1970) Conversion of γ-hydroxybutyrate to γ-
aminobutyrate by mouse brain in vivo. Experientia 26:1072–1073
Della Pietra G, Illiano G, Capano V, Rava R (1966) In vivo conversion
of γ-hydroxybutyrate into γ-aminobutyrate. Nature 210:733–734
Doherty JD, Stout RW, Roth RH (1975) Metabolism of [1–14 C]γ-hy-
droxybutyric acid by rat brain after intraventricular injection.
Biochem Pharmacol 24:469–474
Doherty JD, Hattox SE, Snead OC, Roth RH (1978) Identification of
endogenous γ-hydroxybutyrate in human and bovine brain and its
regional distribution in human, guinea pig and rhesus monkey
brain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 207:130–139
Engberg G, Nissbrandt H (1993) γ-hydroxybutyric acid (GHBA) in-
duces pacemaker activity and inhibition of SN dopamine neurons
by activating GABAB-receptors. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch
Pharmacol 348:491–497
Engberg G, Kling-PetersenT, Nissbrandt H (1993) GABAB-receptors
activation alters the firing pattern of dopamine neurons in the rat
substantia nigra. Synapse 15:229–238
Engberg G, Elverfors A, Jonason J, Nissbrandt H (1997) Inhibition of
dopamine re-uptake: significance for nigral dopamine neuron ac-
tivity. Synapse 25:215–226
Gessa GL, Crabai F, Vargiu L, Spano PF (1968) Selective increase of
brain dopamine induced by γ-hydroxybutyrate: study of the mech-
anism of action. J Neurochem 15:377–381