Full Paper
recorded at 400 K, adjusted with a sample containing 80% glycol
in [D6]DMSO. Spectra were referenced to the residual solvent
signal (C2D2Cl4, dH =6.00 ppm). Processing and analysis was done
with TopSpin (Bruker, v3.1) and MestreNOVA (Mestrelab Research,
v7.1.0). Assignments are based on 1D-1H, 1D-13C, 2D-COSY, 2D-
tion by recGPC, an orange solid (15 mg, 40 %) was obtained.
1H NMR (400 MHz, CD2Cl2, RT): d=7.67 (s, 1H), 7.58 (s, 1H), 7.37 (d,
J=5.3 Hz, 1H), 7.25–7.13 (m, 11 H), 7.11–7.09 (m, 2H), 7.07 (d, J=
3.6 Hz, 1H), 7.03 (d, J=3.8 Hz, 1H), 7.01–6.99 (m, 2H), 2.89–2.78
(m, 8H), 1.73–1.55 (m, 8H), 1.47–1.20 (m, 72H), 0.93–0.84 ppm (m,
12H); MS (MALDI-pos, DCTB): m/z calcd for C92H120S8: 1480.7;
NOESY, H, 13C HMQC, and H, 13C HMBC spectra (see the Support-
ing Information). Because of conformational exchange processes,
the spectra of this macrocycle are significantly dependent on
sample temperature and spectrometer frequency. To ensure consis-
tency, all assignments reported here were therefore derived from
1
1
found: 1480.6; GPC (THF vs. PS): Mp =1730 gmolÀ1
.
Synthesis of 7b: 6b (120 mg, 0.13 mmol) and DDQ (90 mg,
0.40 mmol) were dissolved in dry dichloromethane (50 mL) and
added to a solution of TFA (1.5 mL) in dry dichloromethane
(100 mL) at 08C over 5 min. After stirring for another 2 min, the re-
action was quenched by addition of methanol and NaHCO3 (aq).
The organic layer was washed twice with water and after purifica-
tion by recGPC, an orange solid (42 mg, 35 %) was obtained.
1H NMR (500 MHz, CD2Cl2, RT): d=7.65 (s, 1H), 7.57 (s, 1H), 7.35 (d,
J=5.3 Hz, 1H), 7.23–7.18 (m, 6H), 7.17–7.14 (m, 4H), 7.14–7.11 (m,
2H), 7.09–7.07 (m, 2H), 7.05 (d, J=3.6 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (d, J=3.7 Hz,
1H), 6.99–6.97 (m, 2H), 2.87–2.77 (m, 8H), 1.70–1.55 (m, 8H), 1.45–
1.21 (m, 1H), 0.88 ppm (t, J=6.9 Hz, 12H); 13C NMR (125 MHz,
CD2Cl2, RT): d=144.26, 143.08, 142.78, 142.37, 141.15, 140.77,
140.36, 139.98, 137.38, 137.27, 136.73, 136.70, 136.61, 136.51,
136.50, 136.42, 135.55, 133.56, 133.19, 132.99, 132.54, 132.09,
131.44, 131.11, 130.96, 130.84, 129.77, 128.61, 128.32, 127.12,
127.10, 126.70, 126.08, 126.02, 124.34, 123.99, 123.84, 123.79,
123.62, 123.60, 123.55, 54.00, 54.00, 34.03, 33.90, 33.69, 32.53,
32.14, 31.85, 31.81, 31.69, 30.34, 30.33, 30.31, 30.29, 30.29, 30.25,
30.23, 30.20, 30.15, 30.09, 30.06, 30.05, 29.97, 29.95, 23.29, 23.29,
14.49 ppm; MS (MALDI-pos, DCTB): m/z calcd for C116H168S8: 1817.1;
1
a 1D-1H and a H,13C HMBC spectrum measured consecutively on
the 600 MHz spectrometer. 13C chemical shifts were measured in
the indirect dimension of the HMBC spectrum.
Scanning tunneling microscopy (STM)
The experimental setup consisted of an Agilent 5500 SPM system
placed on a Halcyonics active vibration damping platform and en-
closed in a home-built acoustic damping box. Mechanically cut Pt/
Ir (80:20) tips were used and further modified in situ by applying
short voltage pulses until high resolution was achieved. Highly ori-
ented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) substrates were obtained from
MikroMasch in ZYB quality and freshly cleaved prior to each experi-
ment. All STM measurements were performed at the solid/liquid in-
terface (with the tip immersed in the solution). A solution of the re-
spective substance in 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene (TCB, 0.5 mL, 10À5
–
10À6 m) was dropped onto a piece of freshly cleaved HOPG at
808C, the temperature was retained for 20 s, then, the sample was
allowed to cool to RT. The sample was inserted into the STM and
the STM imaging was performed, which was typically completed
within 30 min. Bias voltages between À0.6 V and À0.8 V and cur-
rent set points between 10 pA and 50 pA were applied to acquire
the images shown here. All images were calibrated by subsequent
immediate acquisition of an additional image at reduced bias volt-
age; therefore, the atomic lattice of the HOPG surface is visible,
which is used as a calibration grid. Data processing, also image cal-
ibration, was performed by using the SPIP 5 (Image Metrology)
software package.
found: 1817.2; GPC (THF vs. PS): Mp =2520 gmolÀ1
.
Synthesis of 10: (130 mg, 0.12 mmol) and DDQ (82 mg,
9
0.36 mmol) were dissolved in dry dichloromethane (50 mL) and
subsequently added at 08C to a solution of TFA (1.5 mL) in dry di-
chloromethane (120 mL) over 5 min. After stirring for another
4 min, the reaction was quenched by addition of methanol and
NaHCO3 (aq). The organic layer was washed twice with water and
after purification by recGPC, an orange solid (5 mg, 4 %) was ob-
1
tained. H NMR (500 MHz, C2D2Cl4, 373 K): d=7.60 (s, 2H), 7.28 (s,
2H), 7.26 (d, J=3.7 Hz, 4H), 7.23 (d, J=3.7 Hz, 4H), 7.21–7.18 (m,
12H), 7.10 (d, J=3.7 Hz, 4H), 2.95–2.89 (m, 8H), 1.79–1.71 (m, 8H),
1.53–1.31 (m, 120H), 1.04–0.91 ppm (m, 12H); MS (MALDI-pos,
DCTB): m/z calcd for C132H176S12: 2145.0; found: 2145.0; GPC (THF
Synthesis and characterization
Synthesis of 3: 2 (23 mg, 0.05 mmol) and DDQ (8 mg, 0.15 mmol)
were dissolved in dry dichloromethane (20 mL) and subsequently
added at 08C to a solution of TFA (0.4 mL) in dry dichloromethane
(20 mL) over 5 min. After stirring for another 5 min, the reaction
was quenched by addition of methanol and NaHCO3 (aq). The or-
ganic layer was washed twice with water and after purification by
recGPC, an orange solid (7 mg, 31 %) was obtained. 1H NMR
(500 MHz, C2D2Cl4, 373 K): d=7.76 (dd, J1 =1.6 Hz, J2 =1.6 Hz, 1H),
7.74 (dd, J1 =1.6 Hz, J2 =1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.70 (dd, J1 =1.7 Hz, J2 =
1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.68 (dd, J1 =1.7 Hz, J2 =1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.65 (dd, J1 =
1.6 Hz, J2 =1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.52 (dd, J1 =1.6 Hz, J2 =1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (d,
J=5.2 Hz, 1H), 7.38 (d, J=3.8 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (d, J=3.8 Hz, 1H),
7.32–7.30 (m, 2H), 7.28 (d, J=3.8 Hz, 1H), 7.26–7.24 (m, 2H), 7.23
(d, J=3.7 Hz, 1H), 7.22–7.18 (m, 4H), 7.18 (d, J =3.7 Hz, 1H), 7.05
(d, J=3.7 Hz, 1H), 6.92 (d, J=3.8 Hz, 1H), 1.50 ppm (s, 1H); MALDI
HRMS: m/z calcd for C52H40S8: 920.0891; found: 920.0874; GPC (THF
vs. PS): Mp =2950 gmolÀ1
.
Synthesis of 14: 13 (24 mg, 0.02 mmol) and DDQ (15 mg,
0.07 mmol) were dissolved in dry dichloromethane (30 mL) and
subsequently added at 08C to a solution of TFA (0.7 mL) in dry di-
chloromethane (30 mL) over 5 min. After stirring for another 5 min,
the reaction was quenched by addition of methanol and NaHCO3
(aq). The organic layer was washed twice with water and after pu-
rification by recGPC, the open-chain dimer (6 mg, 28 %) was ob-
tained as a yellow liquid together with 14 as a yellow solid (1 mg,
4 %).
1
Acyclic dimer: H NMR (400 MHz, CD2Cl2, RT): d=7.45 (s, 2H), 7.23
(s, 2H), 7.19 (d, J=5.2 Hz, 2H), 7.13 (d, J=3.7 Hz, 2H), 7.10 (d, J=
3.7 Hz, 2H), 7.04 (s, 2H), 7.02 (d, J=3.9 Hz, 2H), 7.02 (d, J =4.0 Hz,
2H), 6.96 (d, J=5.2 Hz, 2H), 2.81–2.77 (m, 16H), 1.74–1.55 (m,
16H), 1.35–1.13 (m, 144H), 0.93–0.81 ppm (m, 24H); MS (MALDI-
pos, DCTB): m/z calcd for C140H218S8: 2155.5; found: 2155.4; GPC
vs. PS): Mp =630 gmolÀ1
.
Synthesis of 7a: 6a (38 mg, 0.05 mmol) and DDQ (35 mg,
0.15 mmol) were dissolved in dry dichloromethane (30 mL) and
added to a solution of TFA (0.6 mL) in dry dichloromethane
(30 mL) at 08C over 5 min. After stirring for another 4 min, the re-
action was quenched by addition of methanol and NaHCO3 (aq).
The organic layer was washed twice with water and after purifica-
(THF vs. PS): Mp =3030 gmolÀ1
.
1
Cyclodimer: H NMR (400 MHz, CD2Cl2, RT): d=7.46 (s, 2H), 7.26 (s,
2H), 7.19 (s, 4H), 7.11 (d, J=3.7 Hz, 4H), 7.07 (d, J=3.7 Hz, 4H),
2.94–2.59 (m, 16H), 1.65–1.59 (m, 16H), 1.39–1.19 (m, 144H), 0.94–
0.77 ppm (m, 24H); MS (MALDI-pos, DCTB): m/z calcd for
Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 1379 – 1384
1383
ꢀ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim