H. Gurulingappa et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 1871–1873
1873
measurement, 20 ml was diluted into 158 ml of 20 mM
Tris, pH 8.0, 10 mM ZnCl2. 20 ml of the synthesized
compounds were added to each reaction to obtain final
concentrations ranging from 0 to 10 mM. The mixtures
were incubated at room temperature for 30 min to
allow enzyme-inhibitor complex formation, and the
reactions were initiated by the addition of 2 ml of 1 mM
2. Kropp, H.; Sundelof, J. G.; Hajdu, R.; Kahan, F. M.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1982, 22, 62–70.
3. Kahan, F. M.; Kropp, H.; Sundelof, J. G.; Birnbaum,
J. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1983, 12, 1–35.
4. Campbell, B. J.; Shih, Y. D.; Forrester, L. J.; Zahler,
W. L. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1988, 956, 110–118.
5. Nitanai, Y.; Satow, Y.; Adachi, H.; Tsujimoto, M. J.
Mol. Biol. 2002, 321, 177–184.
substrate (ꢀDNP-L-Lys-D
-Amp).14 While incubating at
37°C, fluorescence (uex=320 nm, uem=405 nm) mea-
surements were determined at 30 s intervals and the
relative reaction rate was taken as the rate of increase
of fluorescence over time.
6. Greenstein, J. P. Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Subj. Biochem.
1948, 8, 117–169.
7. Atherton, F. R.; Hassall, C. H.; Lambert, R. W. J.
Med. Chem. 1986, 29, 29–40.
8. Smith, A. B.; Yager, K. M.; Taylor, C. M. J. Am.
From the data in Table 1, it is apparent that com-
pounds 8, 10 and 12 are potent RDP inhibitors while 15
and 16 are far less active. In general, compounds with
the Z configuration (8, 10, and 12) are significantly
more active than their E counterparts (9, 11 and 13).
Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 10879–10888.
9. Xiao, J.; Zhang, X.; Yuan, C. Heteroatom Chem. 2000,
11, 536–540.
10. Wu, Y. Q.; Mobashery, S. J. Med. Chem. 1991, 34,
1914–1916.
11. Baylis, E. K.; Campbell, C. D.; Dingwall, J. D. J.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1984, 2845–2853.
12. Parsons, W. H.; Hajdu, R.; Schoen, W. R.; Combs, P.
L.; Sundelof, J.; Patchett, A. A. Biochem. Int. 1991, 23,
1107–1115.
13. Schoen, W. R.; Parsons, W. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988,
29, 5201–5204.
14. Ian, J. W.; Jill, L.; Carvell, H. W.; Nigel, M. H. Anal.
Biochem. 1999, 268, 245–251.
Our rationale for the preparation of these compounds
was based on the previous studies that the tetrahedral
geometry of the phosphorous in phosphinic acid is
important to mimic the presumed tetrahedral transition
state to inhibit dipeptide hydrolysis.9 We envisioned
that the use of aromatic side chains in such compounds
would substantially stabilize enzyme-inhibitor complex
formation by hydrophobic interactions.
15. Compound 11: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): l 7.02
(m, 1H), 3.44 (m, 1H), 3.21 (m, 2H), 0.80–1.85 (m,
23H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CD3OD): l 168.3, 145.0,
125.6, 43.5, 39.5, 38.5, 35.3, 32.8, 31.6, 30.5, 29.2, 28.2,
26.5, 25.2, 24.5, 22.5, 21.6, 19.5; LC–MS m/z 436 [M]+,
438 [M+2]+.
In conclusion, we have designed small molecules as
inhibitors of RDP. Structure–activity relationship stud-
ies of this new class of compounds are continuing and
will be reported in due course.
16. Compound 4: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): l 7.83
(d, 1H, J=4 Hz), 7.78 (d, 2H, J=8 Hz), 7.46 (d, 2H,
J=8 Hz), 3.63 (m, 1H), 3.07 (m, 2H), 0.4–1.82 (m,
13H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CD3OD): l 168.6, 138.5,
137.4, 136.8, 134.2, 128.3, 127.5, 126.2, 95.8, 46.3, 32.4,
31.8, 30.6, 29.2, 28.4, 25.3, 24.5, 19.6; LC–MS m/z 477
[M]+.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for the support provided by the
National Institute of Health. We would like to thank
the Biophysical Chemistry Department for NMR
studies.
17. Compound 5: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): l 7.67
(d, 2H, J=8 Hz), 7.14 (d, 2H, J=8 Hz), 6.95 (d, 1H,
J=4 Hz), 3.62 (m, 1H), 3.10 (m, 2H), 0.88–1.81 (m,
13H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CD3OD): l 169.2, 137.5,
137.2, 136.6, 135.2, 127.5, 126.5, 125.8, 95.3, 46.5, 32.4,
30.8, 31.2, 29.3, 28.2, 25.4, 24.8, 23.6; LC–MS m/z 477
[M]+.
References
1. Buckhaults, P.; Rago, C.; Croix, B. S.; Romans, K. E.;
Saha, S.; Zhang, L.; Vogelstein, B.; Kinzler, K. W.
Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 6996–7001.