Kinetics of Thiol−Disulfide Exchange in Dendimers
A R T I C L E S
Conclusions
and B, KAB), correction factors of 4, 3/2, 2/3, and 1/4 were
applied respectively to Keq’s to yield KAB, KBC, KCD, and KDE
based the complete reaction scheme which accounts for
individual species of each population (elaborated in the Sup-
porting Information). These constants increase, suggesting that
dansyl groups exchange more favorably as the architecture
becomes less sterically hindered. Intuitively, we expect the rates
of disulfide exchange to be similar for A, B, C, and D as these
groups of species can adopt a variety of conformations.
However, as disulfide groups are lost, the molecular architecture
should have more volume accessible to reduced DTT and
subsequent reactions, interestingly, for both 3 and 5.
One of our long-term goals for these molecules is their use
as models for drug delivery.46-48 To this end, disulfides could
play two roles. First, disulfides might be employed for linking
pharmacophores until exposure to cellular concentrations of
reductant.4-6 Second, disulfides could be used to append
targeting groups such as peptides49,50 to direct in a “magic-
bullet” sense the dendrimer to specific sites within the body
that could complement size-based targeting resulting from the
enhanced permeability and retention of tumors for large
molecules (the EPR effect).51-53 The current study shows that
both roles remain feasible. Most importantly, dendrimers bearing
multiple disulfide-linked hydrophobic groups are tractable and
highly water soluble. The opportunity to tailor rates of release
as a function of dendrimer structure is very interesting to us
(and others, as Takaguchi and co-workers reported thiol-
disulfide exchange in a dendrimer with a disulfide core)54 and
may be relevant for delivery regimes that require the dendrimer
be internalized by the target cell.
By providing relative populations of the products of thiol-
disulfide exchange over time, mass spectrometry provides a
description of the kinetics of the process upon which kinetic
models can be formulated. The models for both 3 and 5 are
tantalizing in that they suggest that the rate of exchange increases
as the dendrimer becomes less crowded. The quality of the data
and the errors associated with the experiment make such
conclusions noteworthy, but preliminary. An additional limita-
tion to these studies merits some comment. While we success-
fully approached the equilibrium position of A-E with pure
A, we have been unsuccessful in purifying E by HPLC and
reconstituting the reaction mixture. The size and common
polarities associated with these dendrimers have made what
would be an ordinarily difficult exercise intractable. In conclu-
sion, we add thiol-disulfide-exchange reactions to the list of
“dendritic effects” that dendrimers have been shown to impart
including catalysis,55 molecular recognition,56 cellular uptake,57
and redox58 and optical processes.59
To determine whether a more extended kinetic scheme
incorporating cooperative pathways for release could be statisti-
cally supported by the available experimental data, the reversible
model was expanded to include macrocyle F linked by two
additional reactions (eqs 13 and 14, Figure 4, including the
dashed box). However, when this expanded system was analyzed
as above for 3, the improvement obtained in adequacy was
insignificant, while the parameter statistical tests were negatively
affected. Accordingly, we have rejected reactions 13 and 14
and conclude that the eight-reaction model adequately describes
the kinetics of the system.
r5 ) k5[B]
(13)
(14)
r6 ) k6[F][DTTr]
Computational Rationalization. Recognizing that the struc-
ture of the dendrimer does affect the rate of thiol-disulfide
exchange, we turned to computation in an attempt to rationalize
these differences. Gas-phase simulations presumably mimic the
hydrophobic collapse of these structures. Targets 1-5 are shown
in Figure 5 as stick models of the full architecture, of only the
disulfide-linked chromophores, as space-filling models from the
front and back (after a 180° rotation). The radii of gyration
calculated for these models (in Å) (1-5: 7.9, 9.2, 9.8, 16.8,
12.4) are consistent with the hydrodynamic trend observed using
GPC of the protected precursors.
Acknowledgment. Robert A. Welch Foundation (E.E.S.:
A-1439), and the National Institutes of Health (P.A.L.: GM63958;
E.E.S.: GM64650) supported these investigations. The Labora-
Unfortunately, no simple metric for predicting the kinetics
of release emerges on the basis of these structures. Instead, and
perhaps surprisingly, the best predictor of rate turns out to be
the location of the labile bond in the two-dimensional repre-
sentations shown in Chart 1. The shortcomings of these
simulations can be attributed to a number of factors including
the large size of these architectures, very few conformational
restrictions, a limited pool of target structures to survey, the
absence of solvent, and the relative abundance of local minima
and relatively large conformational space available for search.
Regardless, these computations continue to provide interesting
pictures of candidate architectures which serve as excellent
mechanisms for challenging our intuition.
(46) Liu, M.; Frechet, J. M. J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. Today 1999, 2, 393-401.
(47) Stiriba, S.-E.; Frey, H.; Haag, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1329-
1334.
(48) Schultz, L. G.; Zimmerman, S. C. Pharm. News 1999, 6, 25-29.
(49) Pasqualini, R.; Rouslahti, E. Nature 1996, 380, 364-366.
(50) Arap, W.; Pasqualini, R.; Ruoslhati, E. Science 1998, 279, 377-380.
(51) Duncan, R.; Pratten, M. K.; Cable, H. C.; Ringsdorf, H.; Llyod, J. B.;
Biochem. J. 1981, 196, 49-55.
(52) Searle, F.; Gac-Breton, S.; Keane, R.; Dimitrijevic, S.; Brocchini, S.;
Sausville, E. A.; Duncan, R. Bioconjugate Chem. 2001, 12, 711-718.
(53) Maeda, H.; Wu, J.; Sawa, T.; Matsumura, Y.; Hori, K. J. Controlled Release
2000, 65, 271-284.
(54) Takaguchi, Y.; Saito, K.; Suzuki, S.; Hamada, K.; Ohta, K.; Motoyoshiya,
J.; Aoyama, H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2002, 75, 1347-1351.
(55) See, for example: (a) Kleij, A. W.; Gossage, R. A.; Jastrzebski, J. T. B.
H.; Boersma, J.; Van Koten, Ge. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 176-
178. (b) Kleij, A. W.; Gossage, R. A.; Klein Gebbink, R. J. M.; Brinkmann,
N.; Reijerse, E. J.; Kragl, U.; Lutz, M.; Spek, A. L.; van Koten, G. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 12112-12124.
(56) See, for example: (a) Richter-Egger, D. L.; Tesfai, A.; Tucker, S. A. Anal.
Chem. 2001, 73 (23), 5743-5751. (b) Koenig, S.; Muller, L.; Smith, D.
K. Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 979-986. (c) Valerio, C.; Ruiz, J.; Fillaut, J.-
L.; Astruc, D. C. R. Acad. Sci. 1999, 2, 79-83. (d) Cardona, C. M.; Alvarez,
J.; Kaifer, A. E.; McCarley, T. D.; Pandey, S.; Baker, G. A.; Bonzagni, N.
J.; Bright, F. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6139-6144.
(57) Wiwattanapatapee, R.; Carreno-Gomez, B.; Malik, N.; Duncan, R. Pharm.
Res. 2000, 17, 991-998.
(45) The relationship between the full and reduced models is shown in the
Supporting Information. The results are that k1 ) 4kAB, k-1 ) kBA, k2
)
3kBC, k-2 ) 2kCB, k3 ) 2kCD, k-3 ) 3kDC, k4 ) 4kED, k-4 ) kDE. Equilibrium
constants describing individual reactions in the full reaction scheme (KAB
BC, KCD, and KDE) can be related to those obtained by fitting the reduced
,
K
model to the data (Keqs) with specific corrections described in the text. As
required, the product of the Keqs in the reduced system equals that of the
full system.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 17, 2003 5093