isomers: myo, scyllo, cis, D-(+)-chiro, L-(-)chiro, epi, allo,
muco, and neo inositols (Figure 2). Among this group, the
myo (the most abundant), scyllo, cis, D-(+)-chiro, and L-
(-)-chiro-inositols are naturally occurring.
cyclitol derivatives via the desymmetrization of cyclohexa-
dienylsilanes.14b Continued exploration of the structure-
activity relationships of inositol phosphates and their bio-
macromolecule targets has fueled an ongoing interest in
the development of efficient syntheses of these com-
pounds.2b,15
In the preceding paper,16 we described a strategy for
synthesis of enantiomerically pure cyclohexenylsilanes via
a stereoselective aldehyde γ-silylallylboration followed by
a RCM reaction sequence. Here we report the application
of this procedure to the synthesis of highly functionalized
cyclohexenylsilanes that serve as intermediates in the
synthesis of several conduritols (B, C, E, and F) and inositols
(D-(+)-chiro and neo).
An important feature of our strategy was the recognition
that members of the conduritol or inositol family could be
synthesized from cyclohexenylsilane intermediates by simple
trifurcation of the synthetic sequence. As illustrated in Figure
3, conduritols F and B and D-(+)-chiro-inositol can be
accessed from â-hydroxy cyclohexylsilane 5. The two
stereochemically distinct â-hydroxy silane units in 5 are
substrates for regioselectively distinct Peterson elimination
reactions,17 while the silyl group can serve as a hydroxyl
surrogate via Fleming-Tamao oxidation.18 â-Hydroxy cy-
clohexylsilane 5 would derive from diene 6 via RCM
followed by a catalytic olefin dihydroxylation reaction. We
anticipated that diene 6, in turn, would be prepared by
stereoselective γ-allylboration of aldehyde 816 with chiral
γ-silylallylborane 7.19 In addition, we recognized that con-
duritols C and E and neo-inositol could be accessed by an
analogous sequence simply by employing the enantiomeric
silylallylborating reagent, ent-7, in the allylboration of 8.
Treatment of (E)-γ-silylallylborane 7 with aldehyde 816
gave hydroxysilane 6 in 83% yield with 9:1 diastereoselec-
tivity (Scheme 1). Subsequent RCM of 6 using Grubbs’
Figure 2. Inositols and Ins(1,4,5)P3.
Considerable effort has been devoted toward the synthesis
of all of the conduritol and inositol stereoisomers.1a,9
Recently, syntheses of optically pure conduritols have been
developed starting from sugars10 and tartrate derivatives,11
by sequences involving ring-closing metathesis (RCM)
reactions. The use of chemical12 or enzymatic13 resolution
of racemic conduritols or their precursors has also provided
access to enantiomerically pure cyclitol derivatives.
Various approaches for the synthesis of inositols and their
phosphate derivatives have been developed, including the
use of commercially available inositols14c-e,h,15 and sugars,10e,14a,
microbial oxidation of arenes,14f and hydrogenation of
tetrahydroxyquinone.14g Landais has synthesized several
Scheme 1
(7) (a) Hanck, T.; Stricker, R.; Krishna, U. M.; Falck, J. R.; Chang, Y.
T.; Chung S. K.; Reiser, G. Eur. J. Biochem. 1999, 261, 577. (b) Chung, S.
K.; Shin, B. G.; Chang, Y. T.; Suh, B. C.; Kim, K. T. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 1998, 8, 659.
(8) For a review, see: Berridge, M. J.; Irvine, R. F. Nature 1989, 341,
197.
(9) For recent examples, see: (a) de Sousa, S. E.; O’Brien, P.; Pilgram,
C. D. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 4643. (b) Kadota, K.; Takeuchi, M.; Taniguchi,
T.; Ogawawara, K. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1769. (c) Cere´, V.; Mantovani, G.;
Peri, F.; Pollicino, S.; Ricci, A. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 1225. (d) Ley, S.
V.; Parra, M.; Redgrave, A. J.; Sternfeld, F. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 4995.
(10) (a) Jorgensen, M.; Iversen, E. H.; Paulsen, A. L.; Madsen, R. J.
Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 4630. (b) Hyldtoft, L.; Madsen, R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 8444. (c) Ackermann, L.; Tom, D. E.; Fu¨rstner, A.
Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 2195. (d) Gallos, J. K.; Koftis, T. V.; Sarli, V. C.;
Litinas, K. E. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1999, 3075. (e) Kornienko,
A.; d’Alarcao, M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999, 10, 827.
(11) (a) Conrad, R. M.; Grogan, M. J.; Bertozzi, C. R. Org. Lett. 2002,
4, 1359. (b) Lee, W.-W.; Chang, S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999, 10,
4473.
(12) (a) Trost, B. M.; Patterson, D. E.; Hembre, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999, 121, 10834. (b) Innes, J. E.; Edwards, P. J.; Ley, S. V. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1997, 795.
(13) (a) Kwon, Y. U.; Chung, S. K. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3013. (b)
Sanfilippo, C.; Patti, A.; Nicolosi, G. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11,
1043. (c) Yoshizaki, H.; Ba¨ckvall, J. E. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 9339.
catalyst 920 provided cyclohexenylsilane 10, which was
subjected to catalytic dihydroxylation conditions21 to provide
trihydroxysilane 5 as a single isomer in 94% yield. As
expected, the dihydroxylation reaction proceeded in an anti
manner to both the allylic dimethylphenylsilyl and benzyloxy
substituents.
The dimethylphenylsilyl unit in 5 possesses two â-
hydroxyls, one in a cis and the other in a trans relationship.
1698
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 10, 2003