Correspondence Anaesthesia, 2003, 58, pages 1235–1252
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................
10 Bacchetti P. Peer review of statistics in
medical research: the other problem.
British Medical Journal 2002; 324:
1271–3.
graphic scanning (PET) for the utilisa-
tion of glucose as a marker for activity,
showed decreased activity in the areas of
the brain involved with attention and
higher order cognitive thinking [2].
Consider the case of Gary Hart, after
the Selby Rail Disaster he was sen-
tenced to 5 years in prison for causing
the deaths of 10 people; in summing up
Justice MacKay said: ‘In moral terms I
see little to choose between a driver
who sets off on a journey affected by
drink and a driver setting off in your
condition.’ [3]. Gary hart had had little
or no sleep the previous night.
Therefore, continuing to work when
you have the subjective feeling of
tiredness (with the support of objective
research evidence), could be considered
a breech of General Medical Council
(GMC) guidelines, on the grounds of
putting the patient at risk, when you
know it is unsafe to continue [4,5].
Should something happen, it is not
impossible that you could be proven
‘negligent’ on the grounds of ‘forsee-
ability’ [6]. Even if you are not phys-
ically working, just being ‘on call’ will
affect your sleep pattern and quality of
sleep [7], which may have similar effects
on your performance the next day if
you had been working, as pointed out
in the study. Appropriate management
of this problem will result in reduced
day time activity, but failure to act will
continue to create risk. The problem
will become more acute in August 2004
as the European Working Time Direct-
ive bites for junior doctors hours.
Summary
Bacchetti [10] has explicitly stated that
criticisms of power calculations should
only be made when unavoidable: that is,
when there is little else in a study to
criticise, or when a study states clearly
unrealistic goals, or fails to appreciate its
other experimental limitations. Five of
11 paragraphs in our discussion drew
attention to important experimental
problems and limitations of the study.
These potential criticisms (which we
were careful to discuss of our own
study) far outweigh in importance the
rather obscure statistical points made by
Dr Morris regarding power calculations.
Sleep deprivation and
performance
I read with interest the study on sleep
deprivation and performance (Murray
& Dodds. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 520–5).
I have been following the research into
sleep deprivation and performance
since, when driving home post ‘on call’,
I found myself on the wrong side of the
road with a large truck bearing down on
me. This was in the bad old days of
72 h weekends, so things must be better
now. But are they?
While juniors are given the day off
post call, and many work shifts, consult-
ants are expected to continue with the
rest of the days work. Murray and Dodds
do not state when their subjects started
working in the morning, but 07:00–
08:00 would cover most anaesthetic
consultants. If you have then been
supervising juniors, covering the ICU
and ⁄ or maternity while on call, it is not
uncommon to be up until 02:00 the
next day before you can contemplate
sleep, which will then be disturbed again
4–5 h later to get up to go to work again,
or possibly sooner. You may well have
been up all night and are then expected
to continue to work the routine list the
following day, as our contracts do not
recognise ‘on call’ as work.
One study has equated the level of
performance decrement using hand eye
co-ordination after sustained wakeful-
ness, and alcohol consumption [1]. After
18 h of wakefulness, the performance
was equivalent to 0.05% blood alcohol
concentration, and after 24 h, to 0.1%
blood alcohol concentration. If the Trust
found you to have such levels of alcohol
in your blood while working, you would
expect suspension and probably erasure
from the medical register, and possibly
criminal charges. However, if you have
been working all night, it is considered
acceptable to have the same level of
performance, as if you had been drink-
ing, and you still have to drive home.
In subjects who were sleep deprived
for 24 h, Positron Emission Tomo-
J. J. Pandit
John Radcliffe Hospital,
Oxford OX3 9 DU, UK
E-mail: jaideep.pandit@physiol.
ox.ac.uk
References
1 Young MJ, Bresnitz EA, Strom BL.
Sample size nomograms for interpre-
ting negative clinical studies. Annals of
Internal Medicine 1983; 99: 248–51.
2 Altman DG. Statistics and ethics in
medical research. III. How large a
sample? British Medical Journal 1980;
281: 1336–8.
3 Lehr R. Sixteen s squared over
d squared: a relation for crude sample
size estimates. Statistics in Medicine
1992; 11: 1099–102.
4 Glantz SA. Primer of Biostatistics.
McGraw-Hill, New York 1992.
5 Horrobin DF. Rationale for requiring
power calculations is needed. British
Medical Journal 2002; 325: 491–2.
6 Grieve AP. Confidence intervals and
sample sizes. Biometrics 1991; 47:
1597–602.
Anaesthesia has led the way in
reducing patient risk and making life
bearable for its staff; surely the time has
now come for both the Association
and the College of Anaesthetists to get
together and support further research
on the topic of performance and sleep
deprivation?
In the meantime, there is enough
evidence to suggest that it is unsafe for
patient care, and the individual anaes-
thetist, to continue working the day after
a busy ‘on call’, regardless of the grade.
7 Campbell MJ, Julious SA, Altman DG.
Estimating sample sizes for binary,
ordered categorical, and continuous
outcomes in two group comparisons.
British Medical Journal 1995; 311:
1145–8.
8 Florey CV. Sample size for beginners.
British Medical Journal 1993; 306:
1181–4.
S. R. Price
9 Lilford RJ, Johnson N. The alpha and
beta errors in randomised trials. New
England Journal of Medicine 1990; 322:
780–1.
Burnley General Hospital,
Burnley BB10 2PQ, UK.
E-mail: srprice@doctors.org.uk
1238
Ó 2003 Blackwell Publishing Ltd