carbonyl compound, bis(thioenoates) were anticipated to be
a more reactive substrate class.5 Indeed, the enhanced
performance of thioenoates in Morita-Baylis-Hillman-type
cyclizations has been noted by Keck.6 To test this hypothesis,
bis(thioenoates) 3a and 4a were prepared through exhaustive
olefination of succinaldehyde and glutaraldehyde, respec-
tively, using previously reported stabilized Wittig reagents.7
Gratifyingly, upon exposure of bis(thioenoates) 3a and 4a
to catalytic trimethylphosphine at 30 °C in tert-butyl alcohol
solvent (0.1 M), cyclization proceeds smoothly to provide
good yields of the corresponding cyclopentene and cyclo-
hexene products 3b and 4b, respectively (Scheme 1).8
furanosesquiterpene lactone ricciocarpin A. Ricciocarpin A,
isolated from the liverwort Ricciocarpos natans, exhibits
potent molluscicidal activity against the water snail Biom-
phalaria glabrata, a vector of schistosomiasis.9 Among
humanparasitic diseases, schistosomiasis (sometimes called
bilharziasis) ranks second behind malaria in terms of
socioeconomic and public health importance in tropical and
subtropical areas, infecting more than 200 million people in
rural agricultural and periurban areas. Three safe, effective
drugs are now available to those infected with schistoso-
miasis: praziquantel, oxamniquine, and metrifonate. How-
ever, the long-term objective is to diminish the population
of the parasite vectors. Accordingly, the compound baylus-
cide (niclosamide) has been developed to kill infected water
snails.10 However, bayluscide is rather nonselective, having
adverse affects on native fish, contaminating their flesh.11
As such, ricciocarpin A has attracted considerable attention
from synthetic chemists, which has resulted in several
racemic syntheses12 and a single enantioselective synthesis.13
Using the methodology herein, and inspired by related
reductive Michael cyclization strategies,12d a concise total
synthesis of ricciocarpin A was envisioned, in accordance
with the retrosynthesis analysis depicted in Scheme 3. Here,
Scheme 1. Catalytic Cycloisomerization of Bis(thioenoates)
3a and 4a
Scheme 3. Retrosynthetic Analysis of Ricciocarpin A
The marked difference in reactivity between enoate and
thioenoate functional groups suggests that mixed monoenoate
monothioenoates 5a and 6a may participate in catalytic
crossed Michael cycloisomerization. Indeed, upon exposure
of 5a to the same conditions employed in the cyclization of
bis(thioenoates) 3a and 4a, cycloisomerization product 5b
is obtained in 89% yield. The isomeric material 5c could
not be detected by 1H NMR analysis. Analysis of the reaction
product by gas chromatography reveals that 5b is obtained
in 98% isomeric purity. Under identical conditions, the
homologous substrate 6a provides cyclohexene 6b in 82%
yield. Again, the isomeric material 6c could not be detected
ricciocarpin A should derive via catalytic Michael cyclo-
isomerization of an unsymmetrical bis(enone), which incor-
porates all carbons of the ricciocarpin skeleton. The indicated
boat conformation of ricciocarpin A has been established
1
by H NMR analysis. Analysis of the reaction product by
gas chromatography reveals that 6b is obtained in 99%
isomeric purity (Scheme 2).
1
through H NMR and NOE difference spectroscopy.14
(6) Keck, G. E.; Welch, D. S. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3687.
(7) Keck, G. E.; Boden, E. P.; Mabury, S. A. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50,
709.
Scheme 2. Catalytic Cycloisomerization of Mixed
Monoenoate Monothioenoates 5a and 6a
(8) Procedure. Trimethylphosphine (20 mol %) was added to a 0.1 M
t
solution of substrate in BuOH under an atmosphere of argon, and the
reaction was allowed to stir at 30 °C until complete. The reaction mixture
was subjected to rotary evaporation, and the crude residue was purified by
silica gel chromatography to give the cyclized product.
(9) (a) Wurzel, G.; Becker, H. Phytochemistry 1990, 29, 2565. (b) Wurzel,
G.; Becker, H.; Eicher, T.; Tiefensee, K. Planta Med. 1990, 56, 444. (c)
Zinsmeister, H. D.; Becker, H.; Eicher, T. Angew. Chem. 1991, 103, 134.
(10) Nabih, I.; Elwasimi, M. T. J. Pharm. Sci. 1968, 57, 1202.
(11) Schreier, T. M.; Dawson, V. K.; Choi, Y.; Spanjers, N. J.; Boogaard,
M. A. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 2212.
(12) For racemic syntheses of ricciocarpin A, see: (a) Eicher, T.;
Massonne, K.; Herrmann, M. Synthesis 1991, 1173. (b) Ihara, M.; Suzuki,
S.; Taniguchi, N.; Fukumoto, K. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1993, 2251.
(c) Ihara, M.; Suzuki, S.; Taniguchi, N.; Fukumoto, K. Chem. Commun.
1993, 755. (d) Takeda, K.; Ohkawa, N.; Hori, K.; Koizumi, T.; Yoshii, E.
Heterocycles 1998, 47, 277.
At this point, further methodological refinement was
pursued in the context of a synthetic approach to the
(5) Cronyn, M. W.; Chang, M. P.; Wall, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955,
77, 3031.
(13) For an enantioselective syntheses of ricciocarpin A, see: Held, C.;
Frohlich, R.; Metz, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 1058.
1738
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 10, 2003