Article
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 49, No. 17, 2010 7843
Chart 1. Proton Assignment for NMR Studies
Figure 2. Minimum energy conformers calculated for nonprotonated
(L), monoprotonated (HL), and diprotonated (H2L) 4a.
Table 2. Protonation Induced Observed Shifts in the δ Values for the Different
Hydrogen Atoms of 4a in D2O at 303 K, Working at 500 MHz
both amino groups are protonated, most likely to achieve
an extended conformation in order to minimize electro-
static repulsions.
pD
Δδ HA
Δδ HB
Δδ Hc
12.67
9.96
8.55
7.63
6.53
4.86
2.82
0.00
0.07
0.15
0.30
0.37
0.33
0.00
0.13
0.41
0.62
0.73
0.68
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.03
0.10
0.04
In this regard, molecular modeling calculations to get
further information and better analyze this process were also
performed.23 The structures of the local minima obtained for
each protonated state were in good agreement with the pro-
cess suggested by NMR data. To obtain the corresponding
energy minima by molecular modeling, the conformer dis-
tribution calculation option available in Spartan 04 was
used.24 With this option, an exhaustive Monte Carlo search
without constraints was performed for every structure. The
torsion angles were randomly varied and the obtained struc-
tures fully optimized using the MMFF force field. Thus, 100
minima of energy within an energy gap of 10 kcal/mol were
generated for each protonated state of the different receptors.
These structures were analyzed and ordered considering their
relative energy, the repeated geometries being eliminated.
Similar results were obtained for all the ligands. Although a
significant number of different conformations are obtained
within the considered energy gap, all of them maintain some
common structural elements and confirm the predominance
of very different conformations for monoprotonated (HL)
and diprotonated (H2L) species. This can be observed for the
minimum energy conformers of 4a depicted in Figure 2. Both
the nonprotonated (L) and the monoprotonated (HL) spe-
cies present folded conformations, while the diprotonated
(H2L) species presents an extended conformation in order to
minimize electrostatic repulsions. The folded arrangement
for the nonprotonated and monoprotonated system favors
their stabilization through intramolecular H-bonding and
additional electrostatic interactions.
The protonation process can also be monitored
through the use of H NMR spectroscopy. NMR spec-
1
troscopy can give interesting information regarding pro-
tonation sequences, in particular, when the nitrogen
atoms bearing the protons present different chemical
environments.21 It is well established that upon protona-
tion of polyamine compounds, the hydrogen nuclei
attached to the carbon in the R position to the nitrogen
atom bearing the proton are those exhibiting the largest
downfield changes in their chemical shift.22 Therefore, to
obtain further information about the protonation se-
1
quence of the compounds, the H NMR spectra of the
ligands versus pD were recorded. For all the cases, the
protonation of the amino groups is accompanied, as
could be expected, by a significant downfield shift of the
proton Hb (see Chart 1) attached to the stereogenic
carbon atom and also by a smaller downfield shift of
the proton Ha of the isopropyl group. The protonation
also has a minor effect on the shift of protons Hc located
at the spacer.
As an example, the Δδ values obtained for 4a at
different pD values, taking the spectrum at pH 12.7 as
the reference, are given in Table 2. It is worth mentioning
that for the three studied protons (for signals of protons
HA, HB, and HC), the δ values steadily increase on going
from basic to acidic regions, reaching a maximum around
pD = 5 in correspondence with the completion of the
second protonation. At more acidic pH regions, a slight
decrease in the corresponding Δδ values is observed. This
suggests that in order to minimize electrostatic repulsions,
a significant conformational change takes places when
Determination of the Cu2þ Complexes Formation Con-
stants. Because of the interest in developing copper-
containing model systems for metalloproteins,25 and taking
into account our previous experience in this field, for instance
in the study of simplified HCA models,26 the synthesis and
study of copper and zinc complexes of those compounds was
carried out. In this regard, Cu2þ complexes could be easily
obtained by the reaction of one equivalent of the bis(amino
amide) ligands 4 and one equivalent of Cu2þ acetate in basic
(21) (a) Dagnall, S. P.; Hague, D. N.; McAdam, M. E. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 2 1984, 1111–1114. (b) Hague, D. N.; Moreton, A. D. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1994, 265–270. (c) Bianchi, A.; Escuder, B.; García-
~
´
(23) (a) Burguete, M. I.; Escuder, B.; Garcıa-Espana, E.; Luis, S. V.;
~
Espana, E.; Luis, S. V.; Marcelino, V.; Miravet, J. F.; Ramírez, J. A. J. Chem. Soc.,
Miravet, J. F. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 1067–1071. (b) Altava, B.; Bianchi, A.;
~
Perkin Trans. 2 1994, 1253–1259. (d) Aguilar, A.; García-Espana, E.; Luis, S. V.;
Llinares, J. M.; Miravet, J. F.; Ramírez, J. A.; Soriano, C. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1996,
246, 287–294. (e) Aran, V. J.; Kumar, M. J.; Molina, J.; Lamarque, L.; Navarro, P.;
García-Espana, E.; Ramirez, J. A.; Luis, S. V.; Escuder, B. J. Org. Chem. 1999,
64, 6135–6146.
(22) (a) Dagnall, S. P.; Hague, D. N.; McAdam, M. E. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 2 1984, 435–440. (b) Alderighi, L.; Bianchi, A.; Biondi, L.; Calabi,
L; De Miranda, M.; Gans, P.; Ghelli, S.; Losi, P.; Paleari, L.; Sabatini, A.; Vacca,
A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1999, 2741–2745. (c) Bencini, A.; Bianchi, A.;
~
Bazzicalupi, C.; Burguete, M. I.; García-Espana, E.; Luis, S. V.; Miravet, J. F.
Supramol. Chem. 1997, 8, 287–299. (c) Albelda, M. T.; Frías, J. C.; García-
~
Espana, E.; Luis, S. V. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 816–820.
~
(24) Spartan 04; Wavefunction, Inc.: Irvine, CA. For MMFF force field
calculations, see: Halgren, T. A. J. Comput. Chem. 1996, 17, 490-519 and
following papers in this issue.
(25) Stephens, J. C.; Khan, M. A.; Houser, R. P. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40,
5064–5065.
(26) (a) Altava, B.; Burguete, M. I.; Luis, S. V.; Miravet, J. F.; Garcı
´
a-
~
~
García-Espana, E.; Micheloni, M.; Ramírez, J. A. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1999, 188,
Espana, E.; Marcelino, V.; Soriano, C. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 4751–4762. (b)
~
ꢀ
ꢀ
~
97–156. (d) Aguilar, J.; Díaz, P.; Escartí, F.; García-Espana, E.; Gil, L.; Soriano,
Andres, S.; Escuder, B.; Domenech, A.; García-Espana, E.; Luis, S. V.; Marcelino,
V.; Llinares, J. M.; Ramírez, J. A.; Soriano, C. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2001, 14,
495–500.
C.; Verdejo, B. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2002, 39, 307–316. (e) Albelda, M. T.; Frias,
J. C.; García-Espana, E. Encycl. Supramol. Chem. 2007, 1:1, 1.
~