620
A. Syahrani et al. / Phytochemistry 51 (1999) 615±620
for 2 h with MeOH. Concentration of the MeOH
extract under reduced pressure using a rotatory evap-
orator aorded a residue (2.01 g) which was submitted
to column chromatography Silicagel 40 (Merck, 70±
230 mesh) using EtOAc:MeOH:H2O (77:13:10) as elu-
ent and preparative TLC (Silicagel 60 GF 254, Merck;
0.25 mm layer) using EtOAc:MeOH:H2O (77:13:10) as
the developing solvent and UV detection at 254 nm.
Removal of MeOH (used as the elution solvent for the
TLC band) yielded N-acetyl p-aminobenzoic acid 7-O-
b-D-glucopyranosyl ester (4) (117 mg) (Rf 0.25), 1H
Metabolite 6 had positive ion ESMS (+100 V, Na+
assisted matrix) m/z (% rel.int.) 300 ([M+H]+, 3), 322
([M+Na]+, 35), 599 ([2 M+H]+, 14), 621 ([2
M+Na]+, 100); negative ion ESMS ( 110 V, Cl
assisted matrix) m/z (% rel.int.) 298 ([M±H] , 73), 334
([M+35Cl] , 100), 336 ([M+37Cl] , 32), 597 ([2 M±
H] , 77), 633 ([2 M+35Cl] , 60), 635 ([2 M+37Cl] ,
1
29); H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400.13 MHz) d 3.25 (1H, m,
H-4'), 3.30±3.40 (3H, br m, H-2', H-3' and H-5'), 3.75
(1H, m, H-6A' ), 5.61 (1H, d, J=7.9 Hz, H-1'), 6.62
(1H, 0t, J=8.2 Hz, H-5), 6.73 (2H, br s, NH2), 6.86
(1H, d, J=8.4 Hz, H-3), 7.35 (1H, 0t, J=8.2 Hz, H-
4), 7.86 (1H, d, J=8.1 Hz, H-6), 3.54 (1H, m, H-6B' );
13C NMR: see Table 1. For structures of the com-
pounds used see Fig. 1.
NMR (DMSO-d6, 400.13 MHz)
d 2.16 (1H, s,
COCH3), 3.19 (1H, m, H-4'), 3.37 (3H, m, H-2', H-3'
and H-5'), 3.54 (1H, ddd, J=5.7, 5.7, 11.7 Hz, H-6'),
3.75 (1H, ddd, J=1.9, 5.7, 11.7 Hz, H-60), 4.63 (1H, t,
J=5.9 Hz, 6'-OH), 5.08 (1H, d, J=5.4 Hz, 4'-OH),
5.18 (1H, br d, J=3.1 Hz, 3'-OH), 5.41 (1H, d, J=4.7
Hz, 2'-OH), 5.63 (1H, d, J=7.7 Hz, H-1'), 7.81 (2H,
d, J=7.8 Hz, H-3 and H-5), 8.03 (2H, d, J=7.8 Hz,
H-2 and H-6), 10.37 (1H, s, NH); 13C NMR: see
Table 1.
Acknowledgements
Part of this work was supported by grants from
Ministry of Education and Cultures of the Republic of
Indonesia (TMPD S3/S2 Ð grants for AS and ER),
Ministry of Research and Technology of the Republic
Indonesia (RUT VI/1, 1998/1999) and the New
Zealand Lotteries Commission (grants for spec-
trometer purchase). The authors are very grateful to
Ms. Tiurma Susanti Panjaitan for her technical assist-
ance.
4.6. Biotransformation of 8 and isolation of 5 and 6
Incubation of o-aminobenzoic acid (8), and work-up
of the cell culture as described above, produced pow-
dered biomass (14.42 g) which was re¯uxed for 2 h
with MeOH. Concentration of the MeOH extract
under reduced pressure using a rotatory evaporator,
yielded a residue (6.01 g) which was submitted to col-
umn chromatography and preparative TLC (Silicagel
60 GF 254, Merck; 0.25 mm layer) using
EtOAc:MeOH:H2O (77:13:10) as the developing sol-
vent and UV detection at 254 nm. o-Aminobenzoic
acid 7-O-b-D-(b-1,6-O-D-glucopyranosyl)glucopyrano-
syl ester (5) (32 mg) (Rf 0.08) and o-aminobenzoic acid
7-O-b-D-glucopyranosyl ester (6) (5 mg) (Rf 0.42) were
obtained after removal of MeOH (used as the elution
solvent for the TLC band).
References
Agrawal, P. K. (1992). Phytochemistry, 31, 3307.
Dombrowski,
K.,
Phytochemische
und
enzymologische
Untersuchungen zur Biotransformation von Salicylverbindungen
durch Zellkulturen der Weidenart Salix matsudana f. tortousa,
Ph.D. thesis, Universitat Dusseldorf, Germany, 1993.
Dombrowski, K., & Alfermann, A. W. (1992). Planta Medica, 58,
576.
Kamel, S., Brazier, M., Desmet, G., Flinaux, M. A., & Dubreuil, A.
J. (1992). Phytochemistry, 31, 1581.
Metabolite 5 had positive ion ESMS (+100 V, Na+
assisted matrix) m/z (% rel.int.) 462 ([M+H]+, 76),
484 ([M+Na]+, 100), 923 ([2M+H]+, 29), 945 ([2
M+Na]+, 27); negative ion ESMS ( 110 V, Cl
assisted matrix) m/z (% rel.int.) 460 ([M±H] , 100),
496([M+35Cl] , 67), 498 ([M+37Cl] , 30); 1H NMR
(DMSO-d6, 400.13 MHz) d 3.04 (1H, t, J=8.2 Hz, H-
20), 3.13 (2H, m, H-40 and H-50), 3.38 (1H, m, H-4'),
3.40 (2H, m, H-2', H-3'), 3.52 (1H, m, H-60A), 3.54
(1H, m, H-5'), 3.68 (1H, dd, J=11.7, 5.1 Hz, H-6A' ),
3.72 (1H, d, J=11.9 Hz, H-60B), 4.08 (1H, d, J=11.7
Hz, H-6B' ), 4.25 (1H, d, J=7.7 Hz, H-10), 5.61 (1H, d,
J=7.9 Hz, H-1'), 6.62 (1H, ddd, J=8.2, 7.0, 1.0 Hz,
H-5), 6.74 (2H, br s, NH2), 6.86 (1H, dd, J=8.4, 1.0
Hz, H-3), 7.36 (1H, ddd, J=8.4, 7.0, 1.6 Hz, H-4),
7.85 (1H, dd, J=8.2, 1.6 Hz, H-6); 13C NMR: see
Table 1.
Mizukami, H., Terao, T., Miura, H.,
Phytochemistry, 22, 679.
& Ohashi, H. (1983).
Mizukami, H., Terao, T.,
Physiology, 27, 645.
& Ohashi, H. (1986). Plant Cell
Murashige, T., & Skoog, F. (1962). Physiologia Plantarum, 15, 473.
Suga, T., & Hirata, T. (1990). Phytochemistry, 29, 2393.
Syahrani, A., Indrayanto, G., Wilkins, A., & Sutarjadi (1997a).
Natural Product Sciences, 3, 71.
Syahrani, A., Indrayanto, G., Sutarjadi, & Wilkins, A. (1997b).
Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 43, 555.
Tanaka, S., Hayakawa, K., Umetami, Y., & Tabata, M. (1990).
Phytochemistry, 29, 1555.
Umetami, Y., Tanaka, S., & Tabata, M. (1982). Glucosylation of
extrinsic compounds by various plant cell cultures. In A.
Fujiwara, Plant Tissue Culture 1982, Proc. 5th Intl. Cong. Plant
Tissue Cell Culture (pp. 382±384). Tokyo: Maruzen Co.
Vogel, A. I. (1956). A Text Book of Practical Organic Chemistry
including Qualitative Organic Analysis (3rd edition). London,
England: English Language Book Society.