Scheme 5
at 0-25 °C gave 16 (82%). When 16 was treated with NCS
It was found that treatment of 25 with 2% PdCl2(PPh3)2,
1% CuI, benzylpropargyl ether, and TEA/55 °C followed
by 10% CuI and DMF/100 °C (Larock isoquinoline synthe-
sis) gave 26 in 38% yield, Scheme 5, whereas treatment of
25 with stoichiometric CuI and Et3N/benzylpropargyl ether
at 25 °C followed by warming to 80 °C gave 26 in 91%
yield. Addition of phenylthiomethyllithium in the presence
of (-)-sparteine followed by methyl chloroformate gave 27
(83%), but again no enantioselectivity was observed for the
addition. Reduction of the enecarbamate double bond in 27
using Et3SiH/TFA in dichloromethane was complicated by
the competitive formation of 28b (61%) as well as the
required product 28 (31%). The formation of 28b presumably
results from the extended oxonium ion 28a (a pathway not
available in the unsubstituted version, Scheme 3). Conducting
the above reduction, but now in the presence of benzyl
alcohol (15 equiv), increased the yield of 28 to 71%, while
28b was formed in 22% yield. The primary alcohol benzyl
ether protecting group in 28 was selectively removed by
in PhCl followed by SnCl4 (stoichiometric) at 0 °C, the
thiophenyl imino ether 17 was rapidly formed (5 min).12 Mild
acid hydrolysis readily converted 17 into the lactam 18,
whose structure was confirmed by X-ray crystallography.
To explore the application of this new strategy to a more
highly substituted isoquinoline pertinent to the synthesis of
1 and/or 2 required the synthesis of 25, Scheme 4. Com-
mercially available 19 was converted into 25 via 20-24
using standard procedures.13
(1) (a) The Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds. Isoquinolines; Grethe,
G., Ed.; John Wiley: New York, 1981; Part 1. The Chemistry of
Heterocyclic Compounds. Isoquinolines; Kathawala, F. G., Coppola, G. M.,
Schuster, H. F., Eds.; John Wiley, New York, 1990; Part 2. The Chemistry
of Heterocyclic Compounds. Isoquinolines; Coppola, G. M., Schuster, H.
F., Eds.; John Wiley, New York, 1995; Part 3. (b) For a recent review of
these alkaloids, see: Ozturk, T. The Alkaloids. Cordell, G. A., Ed.; Academic
Press, San Diego, 2000; Vol. 53, p 120.
(2) For a comprehensive account of the chemistry and biology of these
compounds, see: (a) Scott, J. D.; Williams, R. M. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102,
1669. (b) Myers, A. G.; Kung, D. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10828.
(c) Myers, A. G.; Kung, D. W.; Zhong, B.; Movassaghi, M.; Kwon, S. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 8401. (d) Kubo, A.; Saito, N.; Yamato, H.;
Masubuchi, K.; Nakamura, M. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 4295. (e) Saito,
N.; Harada, S.; Yamashita, M.; Saito, T.; Yamaguchi, K.; Kubo, A.
Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 8213. (f) Fukuyama, T.; Sachleben, R. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 4957. (g) Fukuyama, T.; Yang, L.; Ajeck, K. L.;
Sachleben, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 3712. (h) Zhou, B.;
Edmondson, S.; Padron, J.; Danishefsky, S. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41,
2039. (i) Zhou, B.; Guo, J.; Danishefsky, S. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41,
2043. (j) Zhou, B.; Guo, J.; Danishefsky, S. J. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 43.
(3) He, H.; Shen, B.; Carter, G. T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 2067.
(4) (a) Corey, E. J.; Gin, D. Y.; Kania, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
118, 9202. (b) Martinez, E. J.; Corey, E. J. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 75. (c) Endo,
A.; Yanagisawa, A.; Abe, M.; Tohma, S.; Kan, T.; Fukuyama, T. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6552.
(7) Roesch, K. R.; Larock, R. C. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 86. In this
paper, the yield of 3-hydroxymethylisoquinoline was 0% when propargyl
alcohol was used (Table 3, entry 5 in the above reference). Simply using
protected derivatives as in Scheme 3 works well.
(8) Corey, E. J.; Seebach, D. J. Org. Chem. 1966, 31, 4097.
(9) For the addition of organolithium reagents to isoquinoline, see:
Alexakis, A.; Amiot, F. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2002, 13, 2117.
(10) Enantiomers were separated using chiral HPLC.
(11) For ionic hydrogenation of aryleneamides, see: Molinksi, T. F.;
Masuno, M. N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 8263.
(12) Closest analogy to the type of reaction is the intramolecular Schmidt
rearrangement. (a) Milligan, G. L.; Mossman, C. J.; Aube´, J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1995, 117, 10449. (b) Mossman, C. J.; Aube´, J. Tetrahedron 1996,
52, 3403.
(5) Herberich, B.; Kinugawa, M.; Vazquez, A.; Williams, R. M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 543.
(6) Deslongchamps, P. Stereoelectronic Effects in Organic Synthesis;
Pergamon Press: Elmsford, NY, 1983; p 211 and references therein.
(13) Saito, D. T.; Morimoto, M.; Akiyama, C.; Matsumoto, T.; Suzuki,
K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 10757.
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 12, 2003
2183