(entry 3). Using dichloroethane as the solvent, the starting
material was completely consumed and the selectivity
improved slightly (entry 4). Therefore, the regioselectivity
for C-H insertion of N-benzyl-protected R-diazo-R-(phen-
ylsulfonyl)acetamides was marginally influenced by rho-
dium ligands or solvents, and Rh2(OAc)4 in dichloroethane
was chosen as the optimal reaction conditions.
Scheme 3
In the previous report, the bulky tert-butyl protecting group
affected the conformational control during C-H insertion
of R-diazoamides and resulted in the exclusive formation of
γ-lactams.3 Considering these results, we introduced various
bulky benzyl protecting groups to the substrate (Scheme 4).
Likewise, reaction with R-diazo-R-acetoacetamide 32
afforded two â-lactams 33 and 34 along with heptatriene 35
via cycloaddition to the 4-methoxy phenyl group.11 Cycliza-
tion with R-methoxycarbonyl-R-diazoacetamide 36 gave
â-lactam 37 and heptatriene 38 without the â-lactam
compound from the insertion to 4-methoxy benzylic position.
There was no cycloaddition compound to the electron-poor
4-nitrophenyl group in all cases, implying that the aromatic
cycloaddition was affected by an electronic effect of aromatic
groups. The cycloaddition to the electron-rich 4-methoxy
phenyl group that was observed in the cases of 32 and 36
was due to the lower electron density of the corresponding
carbenoid centers than that of 29. Presumably, the phenyl-
sulfonyl group would stabilize the electrophilic carbenoid
center, causing the addition to the phenyl group to be less
favorable and the insertion reaction to proceed through a
relatively late transition state with a resulting increase in
regio- and chemoselectivity.12
Scheme 4
Diazo decomposition of diazoamides 39 and 41 afforded
γ-lactams 40 and 42, respectively, in moderate yield due to
the side reaction through the hydride abstraction of the
N-benzyl hydrogen.13 In the absence of N-benzyl hydrogen,
the cyclization of 43 gave γ-lactam 44 in a high yield.
Interestingly, in the absence of substitution at the benzylic
position, diazoamide 45 protected with the 2,4,6-trimethyl
Next, we studied the effects of the Rh ligands and solvent
on C-H insertion of 23 (Table 2). In the case of rhodium
(7) General Procedure for C-H Insertion Reactions. Rh2(OAc)4 (11
mg, 2.5 mol %) was added to a solution of an R-diazo-R-(phenylsulfonyl)-
acetamide (1 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (20 mL, C ) 0.05 M). The mixture
was refluxed for 12 h under N2, cooled to room temperature, and
concentrated. The residue was chromatographed to give γ- and â-lactams.
(8) For 6 analogues, see ref 1c,e: J3,4 (trans) ) 6.1-7.6 Hz; J3,4 (6) )
7.5 Hz. For 9 analogues, see ref 1d: J3,4 (trans) ) 7.8-9.0 Hz; J3,4 (9) )
8.9 Hz. For 12 analogues, see ref 3: J3,4 (trans) ) 1.0-3.0 Hz; J3,4 (12) )
3.5 Hz.
Table 2. Ligand and Solvent Effects on C-H Insertion
(9) (a) Taber, D. F.; Ruckle, R. E., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108,
7686. (b) Doyle, M. P.; Westrum, L. J.; Wolthuis, W. N. E.; See, M. M.;
Boone, W. P.; Bagheri, V.; Pearson, M. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115,
958.
entry
reaction conditionsa
yield (%)
ratiob (24:25)
(10) Structure of â-lactam 30 was determined by 1H NMR analysis after
the deprotection of the 4-methoxybenzyl group. See Supporting Information.
(11) For the aromatic cycloaddition of diazoamides, see: (a) Doyle, M.
P.; Shanklin, M. S.; Pho, H. Q. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 2639. (b) Doyle,
M. P.; Shanklin, M. S.; Oon, S. M.; Pho, H. Q.; van der Heide, F. R.; Veal,
W. R. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 3386. (c) Padwa, A.; Austin, D. J.;
Hornbuckle, S. F.; Semones, M. A.; Doyle, M. P.; Protopopova, M. N. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 1874. (d) Miah, S.; Slawin, A. M. Z.; Moody,
C. J.; Sheehan, S. M.; Marino, J. P., Jr.; Semones, M. A.; Padwa, A.
Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 2489. (e) Merlic, C. A.; Zechman, A. L.; Miller, M.
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 11101.
1
2
3
4
Rh2(OAc)4, CH2Cl2
Rh2(pfb)4, CH2Cl2
85c
80c
81c
87
12:1
8:1
10:1
14:1
d
Rh2(CAP)4, C6H6
Rh2(OAc)4, ClCH2CH2Cl
a Reactions were run at reflux. b Ratio was determined by 1H NMR.
c Starting material remained. d Reaction did not occur when CH2Cl2 was
used as a solvent.
(12) Davies, H. M. L.; Panaro, S. A. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 4871.
(13) (a) Doyle, M. P.; Dyatkin, A. B.; Autry, C. L. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1995, 34, 78. (b) ref 1f.
catalyst with electron-withdrawing ligands, the selectivity
was reduced compared to Rh2(OAc)4 (entry 2). Use of
electron-donating ligands, which required higher tempera-
tures for the reaction to proceed, did not affect selectivity
(6) Greene, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. In ProtectiVe Groups in Organic
Synthesis; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1999.
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 13, 2003
2261