1936
K. K. Murthi et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13 (2003) 1935–1937
Figure 1. Synthesis of alanine conjugate.
Discussion
As shown in Table 1, compounds 1, 1a and 3 are all
potent inhibitors of CaGGTase I but not CaFTase, as
revealed by using recombinant components in appro-
priate in vitro prenylation assays similar to those pre-
viously described.11 Neither 1 nor 1a afforded any
antifungal activity against SC5314 cells, a well-studied
C. albicans clinical isolate (MIC >128 mg/mL). In con-
trast, the alanine conjugate 3 showed potent antifungal
activity with a minimum inhibitory concentration
(MIC) of 1 mg/mL and a minimum fungicidal concen-
tration (MFC) of 2 mg/mL (Table 1).
Figure 2. Compound 3 affects the localisation of C. albicans Rho1p but
not Ras1p. Lanes 1–3 DMSO treated samples, lanes 4–6 compound 3
treated samples. Lanes 1and 4, whole cell extracts; lanes 2 and 5, cyto-
solic fractions; lanes 3 and 6, membrane fractions. Protein marker
molecular weights (kD) are indicated. Ã And # indicate proteins cross-
reacting with the anti-Rho1p and anti-Ras antibodies, respectively.
of Ras1p, an FTase substrate, using a monoclonal anti-
body (Molecular Probes, panRAS) that recognises a
sequence conserved in C. albicans Ras1p (data not
shown). The localisation of the ꢀ44 kD C. albicans
Ras1p15 to the membrane fraction was unaffected by
either DMSO alone or compound 3 (Fig. 2). These
results indicated that compound 3 specifically inhibited
GGTase I in vivo and did not generally affect prenyl-
ation in C. albicans cells. It is interesting that compound
3 effects cell killing after 5 h of treatment. This obser-
vation could be explained if the geranylgeranylation of
only newly synthesised Rho1p (i.e., that synthesised by
the cell to compensate for the turn-over of Rho1p and/
or depletion as a result of cell division) rather than pre-
existing geranylgeranylated Rho1p, was inhibited. Fur-
ther work is necessary to determine if this is the case,
but in support of this idea, we have observed that a
large proportion of tagged Rho1p expressed from a
heterologous, regulatable promoter was localised to the
cytosol in the presence, but not the absence, of com-
pound 3.
Presumably compound 3 is transported into the fungal
cell by an amino acid or peptide permease. To test this
hypothesis, the MIC was determined in the presence of
amino acids in the media which could compete for the
permease. The addition of amino acids at a concen-
tration of 1mM abolished the activity of compound 3 as
indicated by an MIC >64 mg/mL suggesting that trans-
port by a peptide transport system was responsible for
its activity.
Next, given that compound 3 has antifungal activity
and appeared to enter into cells, we asked whether this
compound affected the activity of GGTase I in C. albi-
cans cells. To do this, we studied the cellular localisation
of the GGTase I substrate, Rho1p. Treatment of
C. albicans cells with compound 3 should, by inhibition
of the CaGGTase I, prevent the membrane targetting of
Rho1p mislocalising it to the cytosol. Initially, a kill
curve experiment13 was carried out to determine both
the appropriate concentration and timeframe over
which compound 3 acted. We found that at a concen-
tration of 3 mg/mL, cell killing occurred 5 h after expo-
sure to compound 3. These conditions were then used in
a prenylation assay;14 SC5314 cells were treated with
compound 3, extracts were generated and subjected to
high speed centrifugation. The localisation of Rho1p
was studied by Western blot analysis using a specific
Rho1p peptide antibody.6 In mock, DMSO treated
C. albicans cells, Rho1p was exclusively localised to the
membrane fraction (Fig. 2).
Taking these results together the apparent inhibition of
GGTase I in vivo correlates with cidal activity of this
compound.
References and Notes
1. Georgopapadakou, N. H.; Tkacz, J. S. Trends Microbiol.
1995, 3, 98.
2. (i) Stone, E. A.; Fung, H. B.; Kirschenbaum, H. L. Clinical
Therapeutics 2002, 24, 351. (ii) Denning, D. W. J. Anti-
microbial Chemotherapy 2002, 49, 889.
In contrast, cells treated with compound 3 showed a
significant proportion of Rho1p in the cytosolic fraction
(Fig. 2). As a control, we also analysed the localisation
3. Kondoh, O.; Tachibana, Y.; Ohya, Y.; Arisawa, M.;
Watanabe, T. J. Bact. 1997, 179, 7734.
4. Smith, S. E.; Csank, C.; Reyes, G.; Ghannoum, M. A.;
Berlin, V. FEMS Yeast Res. 2002, 2, 103.
Table 1. Antifungal activity12 of compounds 1, 1a and 3
5. Cabib, E.; Drgonova, J.; Drgon, T. Annu. Rev. Biochem.
1998, 67, 307.
Compd CaGGTase I
IC50, (mM)
CaFTase
IC50, (mM)
MIC mg/mL MFC mg/mL
6. Omer, C. A.; Gibbs, J. B. Mol Microbiol. 1995, 11, 219.
7. C. albicans GGTase I is composed of 2 non-identical sub-
units, a and b. We cloned the genes encoding these subunits
and to assess their requirement for C. albicans viability we
employed 2 alternative but complementary approaches. The
hemizapper or pop-in/pop-out method (Scherer, S.; Davis,
1
<0.005
0.005
0.013
0.2
NT
>128
>128
>128
>128
1a
3
1
2